1
Q
Majweski
A
Voluntary intoxication only a defence for crimes of specific intent
2
Q
Distinguish specific/ basic intent
A
Majweski
Basic- crimes that require intention or reckless as MR
Specific- only intention required for MR
3
Q
Kingston
A
Intoxication is a defence if it results in a lack of MR
4
Q
Gallagher
A
Voluntary Intoxication no defence if MR of crime was there before drinking
5
Q
Heard
A
s3 SOA 2006 is a crime of basic intent
Voluntary intoxication will not provide a defence
‘Lack of reasonable belief in consent’ is an alternative MR
6
Q
Hardie
A
Unexpected side effect of drugs can lead to involuntary intoxication
Criminal Case Law
flashcards
Decks in class (17)
# Cards
