IPHP Flashcards

quiz for monday (wala munang gagalaw sabi ko -rye) (63 cards)

1
Q

Enabled mankind to survive and reach the present level of our civilization.

A

Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A science devoted to the discovery of the proper
method of acquiring and validating knowledge.

A

Epistemology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A mental grasp of reality reached either by perceptual observation or by a process of reason based on perceptual observation.

A

Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Purpose of Epistemology

A
  1. To show how we can acquire knowledge.
  2. To give us a method of demonstrating whether the knowledge we acquired is really knowledge.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

We can acquire knowledge using our senses:
seeing, hearing, tasting, feeling, smelling.

A

Empiricism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

We can acquire knowledge by thinking with the use of our minds.

A

Rationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What philosophers call the rational faculty?

A

Rationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sources of knowledge in Rationalism

A

-innate ideas
-intuition
-deduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

To know is to know something.
This “something” is what philosophers call reality, existence, being.

A

Reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Our first and only contact with reality is
through our senses. Knowledge begins with
perceptual knowledge.

A

Perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

After we perceive things, we began to notice
that some of the things we perceive
are similar to other things

A

Concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

An abstract or generic
idea generalized from particular instances.

A

Concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A statement that asserts or denies something about an object, person, event, or action (an “existent”).

A

Proposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types of Propositions

A

Affirmative Propositions
Negative Propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Says something is true

A

Affirmative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Says something is not true

A

Negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reason to believe one of the others (the conclusion)

A

Inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How do we demonstrate that the statement is true?

A

By providing an argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The second part of epistemology: validating one’s knowledge.

A

Reduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“How did I arrive at this belief, by what steps?”

A

Perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Other ways to determine if a statement is true

A
  • Proof
  • Consensus
  • Means of action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Knowledge validated and when we say validated, we mean they are based on the facts of reality.

A

Truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Based on emotions

Truth or Opinion

A

Opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Based on the facts of reality

Truth or Opinion

A

Truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Open to interpretation Truth or Opinion
Opinion
26
Can be confirmed with other sources Truth or Opinion
Truth
27
Independent of one’s interpretation, preferences and biases Truth or Opinion
Truth
28
Cannot be confirmed Truth or Opinion
Opinion
29
Inherently biased Truth or Opinion
Opinion
30
What we believe or say is true if it corresponds to the way things actually are based on the facts.
THE CORRESPONDENCE THEORY OF TRUTH
31
A belief is true when we are able to confirm it with reality.
THE CORRESPONDENCE THEORY OF TRUTH
32
In order to know the truth of a statement, it must be tested as part of a larger set of ideas.
THE COHERENCE THEORY OF TRUTH
33
A belief/statement is true if it has a useful application in the world.
THE PRAGMATIST THEORY OF TRUTH
34
Different processes of determining the truth or drawing conclusions from various statement using philosophical methods.
Method of Philosophizing
35
Philosophers believe that it is the road to wisdom.
Reason
36
We can achieve this by an act of “disciplined conversation".
Dialect Method
37
Socrates compared to an intellectual midwife.
Dialect Method
38
Socrates’ aim was to achieve what he called the good life which is based on the proper care of one’s soul. The soul can only be good if we employ it in the activity of having a clear awareness of the meaning of some words
Dialect Method
39
They seek to make philosophy relevant by solving real life problems
Pragmatists
40
Aims are to test the belief of science, religion and philosophy by determining their practical results.
Pragmatic Method/Pragmatism
41
The test used for their belief of science, religion and philosophy by determining their practical results.
Pragmatic test
42
The reality of a person is based on his immediate experience.
Phenomenological Method
43
It focuses on careful inspections and description of phenomena and appearances, defined as an object of conscious experience, that is that which we are conscious of.
Phenomenology
44
It arises when there is a disruption from your normal routine and when something valuable is at stake.
Reflection
45
Two levels of reflection
Primary reflection and Secondary reflection.
46
Focuses on the connection between language and reality.
Analytic Method
47
Linguistic Philosophy
Analytic Method
48
Method of breaking down the problem into all of its component parts and analyzing them for information that will help solve that problem.
Analytic Method
49
This fallacy literally means hitting the person below the belt instead of focusing on the issue at hand.
Argumentum ad Hominem “Attacking the Person”
50
This is committed when a person uses threat or force to advance an argument.
Argumentum ad Baculum (Appeal to Force)
51
A person uses emotion such as pity to convince someone
Argumentum ad Misercordiam (Appeal to Pity)
52
Most of TV commercials are guilty of this argument which exploits people’s vanity, desires, etc
Argumentum ad Populum Appeal to people”/Bandwagon fallacy
53
Advancing an idea since it has been practice for a long time.
Argumentum ad Traditio “Appeal to Tradition”
54
A statement is true because it hasn’t been proven false.
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam “Appeal to Ignorance”
55
It is a fallacy in which a conclusion is taken for granted in the premises. Also called- “Circular argument.”
Petitio Principii (Begging the Question)
56
This fallacy is committed when one reaches a generalization based on insufficient evidence
Hasty Generalization
57
Assuming that the effect is related to a cause because both events occur one after the other.
Cause and Effect
58
Infers that something is true of a part, is true of a whole
Fallacy of Composition
59
Division Infers that something is true of the whole, must also be true on its parts
Fallacy of Division
60
Using the same term in a different situation with different meaning
Fallacy of Equivocation
61
Which fallacy literally means hitting the person below the belt instead offocusing on the issue at hand? a. mora licensing b. equivocation c. argumentum ad baculum d. ad hominem
D. ad hominem
62
This fallacy is committed when one reaches a generalization based on insufficient evidence. a. ad misericordiam b. false analogy c. hasty generalization d. post hoc
C. hasty generalization
63
What type of fallacy is present in the statement, “Before we begin the debate, everyone here should know that my opponent is a convicted felon”? a. mora licensing b. equivocation c. argumentum ad baculum d. ad hominem
D. ad hominem