Gender bias
feminist psychology
bias in research methods
reverse alpha bias
avoiding beta bias
assumptions need to be examined
cultural bias
indigenous psychologists
the emic-etic distinction
bias in research methods
consequences of cultural bias
the worldwide psychology community
free will
The illusion of free will
culturally relative
research challenge to free will
determinism
genetic determinism
environmental determinism
- concordance rates show that environment cannot be the sole determining factor in behaviour and there is at least some genetic input therefore environmental explanations cannot solely determine behaviour
scientific determinism
does it matter
Nature and nurutre
nature and nurture cannot be separated
diathesis stress
nature affects nurture
nurture affects nature
epigenetics
Holism and reductionism
The danger of lower levels of explanation
biological reductionism
environmental reductionism
experimental reductionism
the mind-body problem an interactionist approach
idiographic and nomothetic approaches to psychological investigation
Focus of the individual level
scientific basis
being able to make predictions
time consuming
combined methods
- Holt argued that the idiogrpahic/nomothetic distinction is a false separation becasue inevitably generalisations are made
- Holt claimed that there is no such thing as a unique individual and what idiographic approaches actually do is generate general principles, therefore the idiographic approach ends up being nomothetic
- Million and Davis suggested that research should start with the nomothetic approach and once laws have been produced they can then focus on more idiographic understanding
- a number of approaches combine the two approaches
Freud used idiographic methods to study people but also used those insights to produce general laws about human development in his theory of personality
- uniqueness can be produced using the nomothetic approach this depends how we define uniqueness, for Allport only individual traits capture a persons uniquness whereas Eyseneck each individual is unique as they have a unique combination of extraversion, introversion and neuroticism therefore uniqueness can be explained through nomothetic laws