Advantages of using children in psychology
+ Able to investigate child development and early life by determining why children behave the way they do as they age.
+ children are seen as better participants than adults as they are considered naive and will display natural behaviour
+ Understanding children thoughts can help understand adults thoughts
Disadvantages of using children in psychology
-may not understand the task due to its complex language
-children can be prone to harm or long term effects
-cannot give informed consent and may be hard to give a debrief
Describe the use of children in Saveedra and Silverman
Describe the use of children in Bandura
Describe the use of children in Pozzulo
Advantages of use of animal in psychology
+ Easier to control the environment of animals than humans (more ethical)
+ can carry out longitudinal studies on animals
+ can tell us what similar and what is different between humans and animals
Disadvantage of use of animal in psychology
-Cannot obtain reasons as to why they behave the way they do.
-Animals research is more biologically determined while humans are influenced by culture and society so can limit generalisability
Describe the use of animals in Hassett
Describe the use of animals in Fagan et al.
Advantages of individual vs situational
+ useful for society by investigating how behaviours are determined
+ educating people of the power of the situation avoids blame
Disadvantages of individual vs situational
-difficult to separate the effects of a situation from the disposition of a participant
-difficult to control the environment and also difficult to establish ecological validity
MILGRAM: Ind vs sit
IND:
- 14 Participants were defiant
- may have felt obligated to continue do to obtaining their role by “due to chance”
SIT:
- The location- Yale University
- were paid
PERRY: Ind vs Sit
IND:
- Personal traits such as empathy levels
- the perceived threat from the protagonist
SIT:
- What type of protagonist would show
- culture
PILIAVIN: Ind vs Sit
IND:
- Physical abilities (men help more than women)
SIT:
- The amount of help given was determined by which trial was taken place, the ill trials received more help than the drunk trials
ANDRADE: I vs S
IND:
- the number of shapes doodled differed between them (Different doodling styles)
SIT:
- Which situation they were placed in either in the doodling situation or in the control situation that affected their performance
POZZULO: I vs S
IND:
- Some children may have better familiarity with the 2 cartoon shows
SIT:
- False positives could be explained due to social factors
BARON COHEN: Indvidual
BANDURA: I vs S
IND:
- some children in the control group and N-aggressive group still displayed aggression
SIT:
-The number of aggressive acts were determined based on which type of model they were exposed to
FAGEN: I vs S
IND:
- Elephants session times and number of sessions differed between them
- Health implications (elephant 5)
SIT:
- The elephants were placed in various situations of learning different behaviours which lead to them learning how to perform a trunk wash with the use of SPR training
SAVEEDRA: I vs S
IND:
- The subjective ratings provided may have been influenced by personal factors such as age
SIT:
- His ratings changed depending on which type of therapy sessions he was covering.
DEMENT: I vs S
IND:
- Rem patterns differed between participants
SIT:
- The number of dreams recalled were determined by when they were awakened either REM or NREM
HASSETT: individual
IND:
- The gender of the monkey determined which toy they preferred
HOLZEL: I vs S
IND:
- The average time spent on the exercises differed between the participants
SIT:
- The grey matter changes were determined based on whether they took the MBSR training or did not.
Advantage of Nature vs Nurture debate
+ The distinction helps to identify inherited or learnt traits