What is universality ?
there are a range of psychological characteristics of human beings that can be applied to all of us despite differences in experiences and upbringing.
what is gender bias
the term bias is used to suggest that a person’s views are distorted in some way, and in psychology there is evidence that gender is presented in a biased way.
this gender bias leads to differential treatment of males and females, based on stereotypes and not real differences
Maccoby and Jacklin (2014)
The difficulty lies in distinguishing “real” from culturally created gender differences.
Evidence suggests that there are a small number of real gender differences, confirmed through cross-cultural studies.
In a review of the research on sex differences, Maccoby and Jacklin concluded that there were only four differences between boys and girls, including
1. Girls have greater verbal ability
2. Boys have greater visual and spatial abilities
3. Boys have greater arithmetical ability, a difference that only appears at adolescence
4. Girls are less aggressive than boys
androcentrism
taking male thinking/behavior as normal, regarding female thinking/behavior as deviant, inferior, abnormal, ‘other’ when it is different.
In the past most psychologists were male, and the theories they produced tended to represent a male view of the world.
Hare-Mustin and Marcek (1988) argued for there being two types of gender bias: alpha and beta bias.
Alpha bias
theories which exaggerate the differences between males and females
evolutionary approach
has been criticised for its alpha bias. This is because this approach suggests that evolutionary processes in the development of the human species explain why men tend to be dominant, why women have a more parental investment in their offspring, and why men are more likely to commit adultery. However, society has changed considerably over recent years, and it is argued that the evolutionary perspective shouldn’t be used to justify gender differences.
psychodynamic approach criticised for alpha bias
The psychodynamic approach has been criticised for alpha bias, as it exaggerates differences between men and women.
Freud believed biological differences (e.g. having or not having a penis) shape our psychological development – he said, “biology is destiny.”
In the phallic stage, Freud said girls feel inferior because they don’t have a penis.
They develop penis envy, which must be changed into a desire for a husband and children, or else it may lead to problems.
Freud also linked morality to the superego, formed by identifying with the same-sex parent.
Boys fear castration, so their superego becomes strong to avoid punishment
Girls have already “accepted” their lack of a penis, so Freud implied they may have a weaker moral sense
This has serious implications for how Freud viewed female development – as naturally inferior to males.
Biomedical view and alpha bias
The biomedical view says mental illness is caused by things like chemical imbalances or brain malfunction.
This view is dominant in how we explain mental illness, like depression.
When explaining why twice as many women are diagnosed with depression, biomedical explanations often blame hormones — for example, by pointing to postnatal depression or PMS, which are linked to female hormone changes.
This can lead to alpha bias, because it exaggerates gender differences, suggesting women are more emotionally unstable due to biology.
What is the biomedical view of mental illness ?
The biomedical approach sees behavioural and psychological abnormalities as the result of underlying biological problems or disorders.
Beta bias
theories which have traditionally ignored or minimised sex differences. These theories often assume that the findings from males can apply equally to females.
Kohlberg’s stage theory of moral development (Beta bias)
Kohlberg’s theory shows beta bias because it was based only on boys aged 10–16, yet the findings were applied to everyone. His morality of justice framework may not reflect how women reason morally. Gilligan (1982) argued that women tend to focus more on care and relationships, not abstract justice, so they may seem less morally developed using Kohlberg’s male-centred system. This means a real gender difference was overlooked, reducing the validity of his theory for explaining female moral development.
Beta bias in psychological research
In most studies, both men and women take part — but researchers often don’t check for gender differences in the results.
If differences are found, they may be caused by unequal treatment, not real psychological differences.
Rosenthal (1966) found male researchers were nicer and more encouraging to female participants than to males.
He said this could mean men and women are not having the same experience in the experiment at all.
Animal research in beta bias
biological research into the fight-or-flight response has often been carried out with male animals because they have less variation in hormones than females.
It was assumed that this would not be a problem as the fight-or-flight response would be the same for both. However, later stress research by Taylor et al. (2000) has challenged this view by providing evidence that females produce a tend-and-befriend response.
The beta-bias in the earlier animal studies meant that for a long time the stress response was not fully understood and a real difference was ignored.
conclusion of beta bias in psychological research
we end up with a view of human nature that is supposed to apply to men and women alike, but in fact, has a male or androcentric bias.
Asch’s 1955 conformity studies involves all male participants as did many of the other conformity studies (Perrin and Spender, 1980).
It was therefore assumed that females would respond in the same way.
Positive consequences of alpha bias
Negative consequences of alpha bias
Positive consequence of beta bias
Makes people see men and women as the same, which has led to equal treatment in legal terms and equal access to, e.g. education and employment.
Negative consequences of beta bias
Gender bias in the research process
Institutional sexism- Although female psychology students outnumber male, at a senior teaching and research level in universities, men dominate. Men predominate at senior researcher level.
Research agenda follows male concerns, female concerns may be marginalised or ignored.
Use of standardised procedures in research studies
Most experimental methodologies are based around standardised treatment of participants.
This assumes that men and women respond in the same ways to the experimental situation.
Women and men might respond differently to research situation.
Women and men might be treated differently by researchers.
Could create artificial differences or mask real ones
Dissemination of research results through academic journals
Publishing bias towards positive results.
Research that finds gender differences more likely to get published than that which doesn’t.
Exaggerates the extent of gender differences.
Reducing gender bias
Feminist psychology and equal rights laws have helped reduce gender bias in psychology.
They’ve also highlighted ignored topics like childcare, sexual abuse, and the dual burden of working women.
More female researchers like Ainsworth and Loftus have led to more recognition of women in psychology.
Cornwell et al 2013
some psychologists attempt to develop theories that emphasise the importance or value of women. Cornwell noted that females are better at learning, as they are more attentive and organised, thus emphasising both the value and the positive attributes of women.
As a result, this type of research helps to reduce or challenge gender stereotypes which is important in reducing gender bias.
Worrell 1992
Worrell (1992) said to reduce gender bias, researchers should:
1. Use different methods to study women’s real-life experiences
2. Study women in their natural settings
3. Work with participants to explore what really matters to them
4. Use diverse samples – women of different ages, classes, sexualities, and ethnic backgrounds