Abduction
Section 208, CA 1961
Kidnapping
Section 209, CA 1961
Abduction of a Young Person Under 16
Section 210(1), CA 1961
Abduction of a Young Person Under 16 (s.210(2))
R v CROSSAN
“Taking away and detaining are “separate and distinct offences”
R v WELLARD
“The essence of the offence of kidnapping is the ‘deprivation of liberty coupled with a carrying away from the place where the victim wants to be”
R v PRYCE
“Detaining is an active concept meaning to ‘keep in confinement or custody’. Contrasted to the passive concept of ‘harbouring’ or mere failure to handover”
BOYD v R
“The accused’s actions had detained the woman as he had ‘taken over control’ of the victim”
R v COX
“Consent must be ‘full, voluntary, free and informed… freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement”
HIRANI v HIRANI
“duress may arise from the actual or implied threat of force to the victim or another person, but can also include other forms of pressure or coercion”
R v MOHI
“The offence is committed at the time of taking away, so long as there is the necessary intent”
R v WAAKA
“Intent may be formed at any time during the taking away. If a taking away commences before the intent is formed, but the intent is formed during the taking away, that is sufficient”
R v CHARTRAND
“It is not necessary to prove the accused intended a permanent deprivation”
R v FORREST & FORREST
“The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age”