Transposable Elements
Many TEs retain the original copy, are replicative
Classes of transposable elements
LTR Transposons
See OneNote diagram
LTR
pol gene
many different functions e.g. reverse transcriptase
gag
assembly of RNA into a retrotransposon particle
Non-LTR Transposon
See OneNote
- line elements belong to this class, vast majority of LINE1 elements in human are d.o.a. or otherwise unable to mobilise
Non-autonomous TE
Use the enzymes of autonomous TE’s to excise/replicate/insert e.g. SINEs
SINES
See OneNote
Derived from LINES and an RNA made by RNA-POL3
e.g. Alu element
Alu element
DNA transposons
See OneNote
“cut and paste”
Don’t go through RNA intermediate, replicate at the DNA level
Different transposons leaves different footprints behind once they have been excised. Have inverted terminal repeats.
Genomes differ in relative abundance of TE classes
See OneNote
TEs are almost everywhere
Bdelloid rotifers
See OneNote
- Muller’s Ratchet
TE spread in asexual organisms
See OneNote
First lineage not mixing with other lineages as there is no sex
TE spread in sexual organisms
See OneNote
Recombination will occur, TE elements put in different genetic backgrounds and spread throughout the population => sexual populations tend to have lots of TE
The sequenced genome of Drosophila
See OneNote
Where the different TE elements are in the reference genome
Heterochromatin tend to be repeat rich, sequencing requires long reads. Heterochromatin richer in TE than in euchromatin.
Near telomeres and centromeres, more TE
The unequal genome distribution of TEs
Occupancy
“occupancy” = look at one particular insertion, unlikely that a different fly will have a TE at that exact site
Most flies would have a particular TE at a particular site, selected for or in LD with something nearby that is selected for e.g. Doc1420 infers resistance to insecticide
High occupancy in humans but low in flies
Spontaneous morphological mutations
P-elements crossing species barriers
See OneNote
Can age TE by looking at silent sites and using the molecular clock, if silent sites is much older then transfer must be due to horizontal transfer?
The spread and loss of TEs
See OneNote diagram
Selection removes TEs because they are deleterious to host fitness
deleterious because:
Selection removes insertions deleterious to host fitness
See OneNote
Lot of TEs increase the chance of ectopic recombination
See OneNote
Analysis of human genome indicates different LINE families have been active at different points in evolutionary time
See OneNote
Evidence of inactivation over time
Aging TE insertions
See OneNote