L4 - Confidence Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Types of confidence

A
  • Sport confidence: Certainty about ability to be successful in sport
  • Self-confidence: Belief can perform successfully in competition
  • Self-efficacy: Belief can organise and execute course of action to reach specific goal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What characterises self-confident performers

A
  • Set and achieve stretching goals
  • Take and learn from criticism
  • Establish balanced perspective on strengths and weaknesses
  • Take risks
  • Make decisions without fear of being wrong
  • Bounce back from set backs with renewed focus and effort
  • Create a positive future
  • Strong foundation for dealing with pressure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is Self-Confidence most fragile

A
  • Appear to have strong self-belief need to verbalise and externalise it. Exposed and vulnerable
  • Aware of lack of self-belief and waiting to be found out, lucky. Highly self-conscious, self-critical and have negative perceptions of what others think of them and their ability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is self-confidence most robust

A

When performers:
- Built on holistic self-esteem, worth and value
- Humble
- No need to inform others of achievements
- Rational and look for evidence
- Take positive from situation
- Dont take things personally
- Negative feedback as a means of moving forward
- Occasional doubts to prevent complacency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bandura Theory of Self-Efficacy

A

Efficacy expectation predicted by:

  • Performance accomplishments
  • Vicarious experience
  • Verbal persuasion
  • Physiological states
  • Emotional states
  • Imaginal experiences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Performance accomplishments (BToSE)

A
  • Most powerful predictor
  • Personal mastery
  • Positive linear relationship, affected by perceived difficulty, effort, amount of physical guidance and temporal patterning of success and failure
  • Compliancy can be a problem if success is just because obeying orders rather than mastering task on their own
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vicarious experience (BToSE)

A
  • Info from observing and comparing self with others
  • Modelling can provide instructional and efficacy information
  • Important when lacking personal experiences or have perceived similarities to model
  • Model those with relevant or slightly higher ability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Verbal Persuasion (BToSE)

A
  • Persuasive techniques to manipulate behaviour
  • Mediating factors: prestige, credibility, expertise and trustworthiness of persuader
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Physiological States

A
  • Appraisal of physiological state
  • Positive or negative
  • Perception of physical adeptness and fitness especially important
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Emotional States

A
  • Appraisal of emotional experiences and cognitive processes
  • Positive or negative
  • Mediate by selective recall of success and failures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Imaginal Experiences

A
  • Imagine self or others being successful
  • Mediated by efficacy in imagery ability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Distal (past) and Proximal Beliefs (current or immediate) (Bandura 1997, Maddux, 1995)

A
  • Determinants of current SE beliefs may be distal or proximal
  • SE for specific task in specific situation result of confidence of distal and proximal info from the 6 sources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sport Confidence models

A
  • Original model: athletes posses dispositional (trait) confidence that interacts with situational factors to develop state confidence
  • Model revised to take account of Social Cognitive Theory and be consistent with self-efficacy theory: self-confidence is dynamic property not a static trait
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Vealey’s Revised Model of Sport Confidence (Vealey et al., 1998)

A
  • Organisational culture and athletes characteristics influences sources of sport confidence
  • Predicts sport confidence levels which in turn predicts Affect, Behaviour + Cognitions
  • Sources of sport confidence: demonstration of ability, mastery, social support, vicarious experience and coach’s leadership all linked
  • SoSC: Physical/mental prep and physical self-presentation linked
  • SoSC: Environmental comfort + situational favourableness linked
  • Types of sport confidence: Cognitive efficiency is degree of certainty they can mentally focus, maintain concentration and make decisions to perform successfully
  • ToSC: Physical skills and training is degree of certainty about abilities to execute skills
  • ToSC: Resilience is degree of certainty they can regain focus after performance errors, bounce back from performing poor and overcome doubt/problems/setbacks
  • Sport confidence effects behaviour (effect, performance), cognitions (choice, attributions) and affect (emotion, mood)
  • Uncontrollable external factors and physical skills/characteristics also impact performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Protecting Self-confidence: Self-serving bias

A
  • Positive outcomes due to own abilities, negative outcomes due to external factors (Campbell and Sedikides, 1999)
  • Observed where: self-esteem threatened by negative outcome of effort, strong desire to improve/maintain self-esteem
  • Can lead to dishonest behaviour when no external benefits to being dishonest if blaming everything is allowed or performers attribute any failures to external, uncontrollable factors
  • Performers must reflect and accept the internal and controllable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Protecting self-confidence: Self-handicapping

A
  • Thoughts, statements and behaviours in advance of performance.
  • Maintain personal perceptions of control, self-worth and self-esteem
  • Protect or enhance public image
  • Increase likelihood of situational factors blamed for poor performance and personal factors credited for good performance
17
Q

Delusional self-confidence

A
  • Placebo affect
  • Positive illusions: Unrealistically favourable atttiudes/beliefs
  • Religiosity: belief despite lack of evidence
18
Q

Self confident and Anxious at the same time

A
  • Doublethink (Orwell, 1949)
  • Acceptance of contrary opinions or beliefs at the same time
  • Can have strong belief in ability whilst uncertain if they’ll achieve their goals
19
Q

Developing Self-confidence

A
  • Focus on recent accomplishments
  • Draw on own and others experience
  • Manage self-talk
  • Interpreted readiness to perform in positive way
20
Q

Negative Self-talk

A
  • The worrier, the critic and the victim
  • Avoid negatives, use present tense and use personally credible statements
21
Q

Positive interpretation of Readiness to Perform

A
  • Interpret pre-performance mental and physical repines as facilitative to performance
  • Results in physical mobilisation and mental importance and effort
22
Q

Measuring Confidence (Vealey, 1986)

A
  • Trait Sport Confidence inventory:

Measures dispositional belief about sport ability. 13 items 1-9.

  • State Sport Confidence Inventory:

Measures belief about sporting ability in particular situation, same scoring

23
Q

Confidence profiling

A

Step 1: Introduce idea:

  • Introductory comments about sport confidence and performance.
  • Informing why they’re doing the assessment
  • No right or wrong answers

Step 2: Eliciting Constructs

  • Identify what constructs the person thinks a confident athlete possess
  • Then focus on their own types of confidence and sources

Step 3: Assessment

  • Once profile produced, get athlete to assess their sport confidence levels on different statements

Strengths:
- Alternative assessment method
- Developed for use in applied context
- More in-depth account of sources and confident types

24
Q

Hays et al., (2010). The development of confidence profiling in
sport

A
  • Confidence profiling = ideographic assessment of sport confidence from the athlete’s own perspective (not generic measures).
  • Athletes report sources, types, and debilitative factors of their confidence.
  • Sport psychologists found it helps athletes recall confidence experiences accurately and gain in-depth self-assessment.
  • Can be used as a foundation for athlete-centred interventions.
25
Beattie, S., Fakehy, M., & Woodman, T. (2014). Examining the moderating effects of time on task and task complexity on the within person self-efficacy and performance relationship.
- Early learning (first 10 trials): slight negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. - Across 40 trials: self-efficacy positively affects performance. - Task condition matters: Stable/easy tasks → small, non-significant positive effect. Dynamic/complex tasks → significant positive effect. Conclusion: Extended practice and varied task complexity enhance the positive impact of self-efficacy on performance
26
Beattie, S., Lief, D., Adamoulas, M., & Oliver, E. (2011). Investigating the possible negative effects of self-efficacy upon golf putting performance.
- Performance → self-efficacy: strong, positive relationship; performance predicted up to 49% of efficacy variance. - Self-efficacy → performance: weak, non-significant negative relationship; predicted at most 2.7% of performance variance. - Conclusion: The reciprocal effect of self-efficacy on performance is much weaker than previously believed
27
Hays, K., Thomas, O, Maynard, I., & Butt, J. (2010). The role of confidence profiling in cognitive-behavioral interventions in sport.
- Used confidence profiling in a case study with a female swimmer to guide an athlete-driven intervention based on Murphy & Murphy’s 8-step cognitive-behavioural model. - Confidence profiling: Assesses sport confidence from the athlete’s perspective. Identifies individual confidence needs for targeted intervention. Provides feedback on intervention effectiveness. - Post-intervention results: Athlete became more aware of factors affecting her confidence. Reported increased confidence and satisfaction with mental skills training. Perceived performance improvements