‘Traditional’ version: independent multiple origins/parallel evolution of Homo sapiens across Old World i.e. local populations of Homo sapiens have very long prehistories, having evolved in situ since arrival of Homo erectus (sensu lato)
Implications: modern day regional populations may have evolved to be very different from one another – unintended consequences of this hypothesis?
BUT if different populations evolved independently in different ecosystems, how did they all end up so similar?
More recent version emphasise continuous geneflow (i.e. interbreeding) between populations across the Old World, keeping all populations on the same track – just how plausible is this? Supported by evidence of interbreeding between modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans? Does mitigate the suggestion of long evolutionary timedepths for regional variation!
If true, should be evidence of evolution into Homo sapiens in many of the regions where Homo erectus was found – is this the case?