Explain how we classified humans before evolution.
“homo” - defined by Carl Linnaeus.
Explain Lamarck’s beliefs.
Lamarck thought that acquired characteristics can be inherited (e.g. giraffe necks).
First to suggest that humans and ape had a shared evolutionary history.
Thought that through acquired characteristics and over many generations humans became bipedal and lost the ability to climb trees.
Why was there such a debate about human evolution?
We had only found a fraction of the fossil record which we have discovered today.
Until the 1800s, no fossils found of ancient human species, only a few stone tools.
What was the first piece of human fossil record found? What were people’s reactions?
Homo Neanderthalis - first human species identified besides our own.
People were not pleased, controversial.
Describe Australopithecus.
Base of the human tree.
Habitat: Africa.
Describe homo habilis.
The first Homo.
Habitat: Africa.
Describe Homo erectus.
Most successful human species identified to date.
Habitat: Africa.
Describe Homo antecessor.
Two lineages from homo erectus that became us and other species.
Habitat: Western and Southern Europe.
Describe homo heidelbergensis.
Overlapped with (evolved from) h. Erectus.
Habitat: Asia, Europe, Northern Africa.
Describe homo neanderthalensis.
habitat: Europe, Central Asia.
Describe Homo Florensis.
Nicknamed the hobbit.
Habitat: Flores, Indonesia.
Describe Denisovans.
A sister species to us - believed to have descended from the same common ancestor.
The only human species identified solely by DNA, no skull identified to date,
Habitat: Western and Central Asia.
Describe Homo sapiens.
Only extant species in the Homo genus.
Describe the progression of evolution.
It was once believed that there was a straight line of evolution - home species did not go extinct, instead they became the next species in the homo genus.
Evolution is associated with physical and technological changes that opened up new niches.
Explain why there are debates about focusing solely on morphological traits.
What is the issue with using DNA to characterize evolution?
Widely believed that we would never be able to analyze DNA past its half-life.
Half-life = 521 years.
What is ancient aDNA?
DNA that gives the ability to sequence DNA beyond its hard-life.
Current theoretical upper limit for analysis: 1.5 million years.
How does aDNA work?
PCR lets us amplify tiny samples, so it is not an issue that DNA breaks down significantly over time - we can analyze it past its half-life.
We can build ancient genomes from fragments y comparing them to modern ancestors.
How do we expect degree of genetic diversity to differ between populations in different continents?
Africa: high diversity.
Europe: lower diversity.
Asia: lowest diversity.