what is pyric herbivory?
grazing driven by fire patterns
How does the conventional approach to understanding fire and grazing differ from the pyric herbivory approach?
conventional approach is studying different methods on patches and not at a landscape approach. Pyric herbivory approach looks at fire in patches then looking at a landscape and watching how animal roam across the landscape.
Using three brief points summarize the findings.
Patch/burning and allow grazers to freely roam
Key thing is that patches varied in time! Not every patch is responding the same in terms of recovery.
they averaged a moderate grazing with heavy use of bun area and light use of unburned patches. The essentially preffered burned area. They preffered moderate anounts of disturbance.
pyric grazing response can be dependent on —–
site
draw a diagram explaining the relationship of grazing and fire

what are factors that are known to affect the grazing fire interaction?
Conservtion Burning:
re-introducing and maintaing fire as a process within an historic, ecological context.
Controlled burning:
Planned application and confinement of fire to a pre-selected area. Considers time and aplace and control is antiipated and applied
Prescribed burning:
systematically planned burning of an ares when weather and vegetstion favor a particular method and intensity of burning that can be expected to acheive planned benefits or outcomes.
why would we use fire?
what are different types of fire techniques?
when developing a management plan what is the different variations you need to consider?