lecture 2 Flashcards

(38 cards)

1
Q

How does A.W. Moore define metaphysics?

A

Metaphysics is the most general attempt to make sense of things. It asks how reality as a whole hangs together, regardless of whether this inquiry is scientific, creative, or speculative.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why does Moore think metaphysics is unavoidable?

A

Because there will always be some most general framework through which we interpret reality. Even denying metaphysics presupposes a metaphysical stance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the empiricist attack on metaphysics?

A

The claim that knowledge comes only from experience, so metaphysical claims that go beyond experience are meaningless. Example: Hume’s scepticism about causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does Hume challenge metaphysical necessity?

A

By arguing that claims like ‘every effect has a cause’ are not rationally justified but based on habit formed through experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is logical positivism?

A

A 20th-century movement holding that statements are meaningful only if analytically true or empirically verifiable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the verification principle?

A

The principle that a statement is meaningful only if it can be empirically verified or is analytically true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why do logical positivists think metaphysics is nonsense?

A

Because metaphysical claims are neither analytically true nor empirically verifiable. Example: claims about substance or God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does verificationism affect ethics?

A

It reduces ethical statements to expressions of emotion rather than truth-apt claims (the ‘boo/hoorah’ theory).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Moore’s deflationary response to positivism?

A

That positivists themselves make a metaphysical claim by asserting that science alone gives the most general account of reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why does Kant take Hume’s scepticism seriously?

A

Because it threatens causality, necessity, and metaphysics as such, leading to materialism and fatalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What question structures Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason?

A

‘How is metaphysics, as a science, possible?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Kant mean by ‘dogmatic’ metaphysics?

A

Metaphysics that speculates about reality in itself without examining the limits of reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Kant mean by ‘critical’ metaphysics?

A

A metaphysics that investigates the conditions and limits of human cognition before making metaphysical claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are synthetic a priori judgments?

A

Judgments that are informative (synthetic) yet known independently of experience (a priori). Example: mathematical and metaphysical principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why are synthetic a priori judgments crucial for Kant?

A

Because they allow metaphysics to be informative without relying on experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Copernican Revolution in Kant?

A

The idea that objects conform to our mode of cognition, rather than cognition conforming to objects.

17
Q

Why does Kant distinguish appearances from things-in-themselves?

A

To limit metaphysical knowledge to how reality appears to us, while leaving space for faith in God, freedom, and immortality.

18
Q

What is a transcendental argument?

A

An argument that infers the necessary conditions of experience from the fact that experience occurs.

19
Q

What is descriptive metaphysics (Strawson)?

A

The project of describing the actual structure of our conceptual scheme, rather than revising it.

20
Q

Why might Kant’s metaphysics be called descriptive?

A

Because it aims to describe the necessary structures of experience for beings like us.

21
Q

What is a criticism of Kant’s descriptive metaphysics?

A

It may lack novelty or creativity and leave metaphysical questions about reality itself unresolved.

22
Q

What is Collingwood’s core idea about metaphysics?

A

Metaphysics is a historical inquiry into the absolute presuppositions of an age.

23
Q

What is the ‘logic of question and answer’?

A

The idea that every statement answers a specific question, and understanding requires identifying that question.

24
Q

What are absolute presuppositions?

A

Assumptions that cannot be questioned within a framework and make inquiry possible at all.

25
How do absolute presuppositions differ from Kant’s a priori structures?
They are historically variable rather than universal and fixed.
26
What is the metaphysician’s task for Collingwood?
To uncover and articulate the absolute presuppositions governing a historical period.
27
What is Moore’s criticism of Collingwood?
That Collingwood leaves too little room for novelty and creativity in metaphysics.
28
What unites Kant and Collingwood against anti-metaphysical views?
Both argue that metaphysics is possible by focusing on the conditions of human understanding rather than transcendent reality.
29
How might Moore’s definition of metaphysics be defended?
It captures metaphysics’ inevitability and flexibility, allowing both scientific and non-scientific sense-making.
30
How might Moore’s definition of metaphysics be criticised?
It risks becoming too broad, collapsing metaphysics into any general worldview.
31
What are Moore’s three questions?
The transcendence question (can we think beyond experience?), the novelty question (can metaphysics be creative?), and the inevitability question (can metaphysics be avoided?).
32
How could Kant answer Moore’s transcendence question?
By denying that metaphysics can legitimately transcend possible experience.
33
How could Collingwood answer Moore’s novelty question?
By arguing that metaphysics is novel insofar as it uncovers historically shifting presuppositions.
34
What should the point of metaphysics be, according to Lecture 2?
To make sense of reality in a way that is neither dogmatic nor eliminative, but critically grounded in human understanding.
35
How does Lecture 2 set up Lecture 3 (Realism vs Idealism)?
By establishing Kant’s critical framework, which later develops into transcendental idealism.
36
How does Lecture 2 anticipate debates in Lecture 4 (Naturalism)?
By raising the question of whether metaphysics must be constrained to immanent, human-accessible reality.
37
How does Collingwood differ from Kant on metaphysical structure?
Kant treats structures as universal; Collingwood treats them as historically contingent.
38
Why do logical positivists reappear implicitly in Lecture 4?
Because hard naturalism echoes verificationist suspicion toward non-scientific metaphysics.