Where are the complexes in the inner mitochondrial membrane encoded?
Both nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA
How prevalent are OXPHOS disorders?
1:5000 live births
(also see the figure 1:6500, but this is probably too conservative)
However, there are some ethnicities which have much greater rates: e.g. NSM Lebanese
Describe the features of the mtDNA
List the unique features of mtDNA
Describe mtDNA heteroplasmy, the bottleneck effect and the threshold effect
What is the clinical implication of this?
Example:
Mother:
• 20% mutant mtDNA
• 80% normal mtDNA
In egg development, there will be different eggs with different amounts of the mutant mtDNA
Certain oocytes may have a greater or lesser proportion of the mutant mtDNA
Possible to get zygotes with: • 80% mutant load → severe disease • 60% mutant load → mild disease • 20% mutant load → no disease etc
In summary:
Due to heteroplasmy, the bottleneck effect and the threshold effect, it is possible to have very different outcomes
What is the most common OXPHOS disease in childhood?
Give some features of the disease
What is the main pathological feature?
Leigh Disease
How many people carry pathogenic mtDNA mutation?
How many people are diagnosed with mtDNA disease?
Why is there this discrepancy?
mtDNA mutations: 1/200
mtDNA disease: 1/10000
This is probably because of mutant load: the mutation rate is below threshold
NB Some communities have higher rates of the mutation in the population, such as the NSW Lebanese
What proportion of the mtDNA genes can have pathogenic mutations?
35 of the 37 mtDNA genes
What are the different genes that can be mutated resulting in OXPHOS disease?
How are these genes inherited?
What proportion of OXPHOS diseases do these mutations account for?
3. Mutation in OXPHOS biogenesis genes Involved in: • Insertion of Iron / Sodium • Assembly of complexes • Insertion of protein into membrane
Inheritance: These genes can be inherited in all different ways: • Autosomal recessive (most) • Autosomal dominant • X-linked
These mutations only account for 50% of OXPHOS diseases
For 50% of cases, the molecular basis is not known
In what ways have OXPHOS disease genes been identified?
Mitochondrial genome discovered in 1988, whereafter it was sequenced:
About 15 genes were discovered each year
Mutations in which genes can cause to Leigh syndrome?
Up to 50 genes that can lead to Leigh disease:
• 30 Autosomal genes
• 12 mtDNA genes
• 2 X-linked genes
Even though there is this heterogeneity, the disease presents very similar in all the cases
What are the challenges of OXPHOS molecular diagnosis?
How can this be (partially) overcome?
What are the drawbacks?
→ NextGen sequencing is a good option
• Allows much greater volume of DNA to be sequenced
• However, doesn’t have same sensitivity or specificity of Sanger sequencing
Describe the changes to the cost of sequencing of the genome
2001: $100M
2013: $8000
Compare Sanger and NextGen sequencing
What can NextGen technology allow us to sequence?
Sanger:
• 1 target DNA
• Average of all DNA molecules
• around 800 bp per run
NextGen:
• Thousands of DNAs at a time (MitoExome: all of the known mitochondrial proteins)
• Single molecule DNA sequence
• 800 million bp per run
• Candidate gene approach, but at a much larger scale
Can sequence:
• 10, 40, up to 1000 genes (i.e. whole MitoExome)
• Whole exome (20,000 known genes)
• Whole Genome
What is massively parallel sequencing?
aka NextGen sequencing
How big is the human genome?
How many genes?
3 x 10^9
20,000 genes
List some NextGen sequencing technologies
Describe Illumina sequencing
“Sequencing of fluorescently labelled DNA fragments”
Method:
– Target preparation –
– Cluster generation –
– Sequencing –
Describe Ion torrent sequencing
Chip with half a billion wells
Beads contained in the wells
– Sequencing –
Compare whole genome and whole exome sequencing
Whole exome:
• All 20,000 known genes sequenced
Whole genome:
• 3 x 10^9 bp sequenced
How much is 3Gb?
Why is it such a challenge to find mutations in the whole genome?
(3 x 10^9)
This is similar to the number of letter in the Harry Potter series if it had 5000 volumes instead of 7
Mutations are like: • Change in letter • Change in word • Change in a page within these 5000 volumes
Describe the MitoExome Project • The cohort • Method • Stats of results • General overview of results
Over 1000 genes sequenced:
including all the known mitochondrial encoding genes
Within 44 OXPHOS patients
• Had severe diseases, determined to by OXPHOS disorders
• Diverse group
• Defects in the various complexes (Complex I, Complex IV or a combination)
Method:
• Hybrid in-solution selection of the candidate genes
• Illumina sequencing
Results:
• Average 1 change per patient (i.e. gene not ‘normal’)
• However only 8 of the mutations in the 42 patients were relevant to the disease
• The rest are probably ‘normal variation’
• 10 of the patients identified to have known disease genes
• 10 more patients identified with 8 novel disease genes
• 43% of patients had no prioritised genes, i.e. the mutated genes causing their disease are still unknown → where could they be?
Statistics:
Nuclear DNA:
• Over 1000 genes sequenced
• More than 1 million bases sequenced
• Good depth (i.e. fidelity of sequencing?)
• 29 rare mutations identified (i.e. classified as rare from the ‘1000 Genomes Project’)
• 17 rare, protein modifying mutations
MtDNA: • All 37 genes sequenced • Good coverage • Only 3 rare mutations found • 0 rare, protein modifying mutations found
What is Prioritisation, in the context of the MitoExome Study?
Describe the ‘Prioritisation’ observed in the MitoExome study
Prioritisation: an indication that one is looking at the correct genes in the disease group
Ie Looking at mutations in genes causing OXPHOS diseases
MitoExome study: In the 31 subjects study, there was prioritisation observed compared to controls in: • Known or candidate genes • Known disease genes • Candidate disease genes
This means that in the subjects of the study, there were many more known disease genes etc observed than in the control group
Conclusion:
The study was unmasking the correct genes
What is good about NextGen sequencing?