Provide an overview of the key areas related to Intelligence testing & IQ ability
Provide evidence that Group scores in IQ remain stable over time
*Individual’s test scores remains relatively stable after the age of 6 years:
1. 3rd grade school boys (n=613) reassessed 10 years later: r= 0.72
2. 13yr old (n=4500) reassessed at 18 years: r= 0.78
3. 3yr old reassessed at 4 years: r= 0.83 (very good)
3yr old reassessed at 12 years: r= 0.46 (not so good- a lot has changed in the 9 year period)
4. 2-5.5 yr old reassessed 10 years later: r= 0.65, 25 years later: r=0.85 (very good!) overall r=0.59
*By about 16-18 years of age, IQ remains pretty stable
What are the implications that Group scores in IQ remain stable over time?
Implications:
*Good Predictive Validity of the tests
OR
*Predictive Validity of IQ tests is confounded with stability of the environment of longitudinal studies
Why are group IQ scores more stable with age?
Possible explanations are:
Provide evidence that Individual IQ scores can be more unstable over time
California Guidance study (n=222)
*6yr vs 18 yr - test-retest correlations were high (around 0.60)
*59% of children IQ increased by up to 15
*37% of children IQ increased by up to 20
*9% of children IQ increased by up to 30!!!
This is incredible!
What are some of the factors affecting a child’s intellectual development?
When viewing the correlation between IQ scores compared at different time periods, what is an important consideration?
What did Capron & Duyme find from their 1989 Adoption study published in Nature?
What have been the findings of some longitudinal studies into the effect of SES on IQ score?
The Rochester Longitudinal Study by Sameroff et al., (1987, 1993) found 10 risk factors associated with decreases in IQ score. What were these?
What was the impact for the children in the Rochester Longitudinal Study by Sameroff et al., (1987, 1993) who had 4 or more of the risk factors?
Those children had decreased IQ in the retest phase (1993)
What do we need to bear in mind when considering Group and individual differences of Age, Gender, Culture/Race, Indigene?
Our results should be stratified by age, gender, culture in the standardisation process as a result it is important that we do not compare one group with another, as this can lead to inappropriate interpretations.
*For instance, we recognise & accept gender differences in the sub-sets, but the overall IQ score is standardised according to group norms so should not have differences
How are IQ scores standardised by age?
What are the standardised scores for IQ tests?
96% range between 70 - 130 68% range between 85 - 115 0.1% have an IQ 55 or below 2% have an IQ 70 or below 14% have an IQ between 71 - 84 34% have an IQ between 85 - 99 34% have an IQ between 100 - 114 14% have an IQ between 115 - 129 2% have an IQ 130 -145 0.1% have an IQ above 146
Why is it inappropriate to compare IQ scores across ages?
What are the main findings from Cross-Sectional analysis of Age-related changes in IQ?
What are the main limitations of Cross-sectional studies?
They are confounded by changes in culture and age
even one generation has seen significant changes in healthcare, diet, technology, media, educational opportunities
What are the strengths and weaknesses of a Longitudinal design?
weakness:
Strengths:
continuation of individuals
What was ideal about the Seattle Longitudinal Study?
It was a Cross-Sequential Design, (AKA cohort sequential) which incorporates the best elements of a Cross-sectional and a Longitudinal
What were the key the design aspects of the Seattle Longitudinal Study?
What were the key findings of the Seattle Longitudinal Studyr?
*No uniform pattern in age-related change across ALL intellectual abilities (The Full IQ scale is not sufficient to measure this)
*Important interactions between: ability x age & ability x cohort were found which complicated things
*Gender differences were found
*Cross Sectional Studies over-estimate declines in intellectual ability prior to age 60
*Individual differences in successful ageing:
no heart disease, high SES, good environment, flexible personality, high cognitive status of spouse, maintenance of high processing speeds
What were the key findings of the Seattle Longitudinal Study related to Crystallised & Fluid intelligence over age?
Where Crystallised intelligence is accumulated information & verbal skills, which increase for age
& fluid intelligence is the ability to reason abstractly, which steadily declines from middle adulthood onwards
What are the main changes in Intellectual ability as found by the Seattle Longitudinal Study?
The Seattle Longitudinal Study implemented Cognitive Training for their participants, what was the outcome?