Cognitive Interview
Fisher et al. (1987) studied real police interviews over a four-month period and found that questions were brief, direct, fact based and closed. Witnesses were often interrupted and not allowed to expand upon their answers. This was referred to as the standard interview. Fisher et al. (1987) argued that this might be contributing to the failure of eyewitnesses to accurately recall the event they had witnessed.
Geiselman et al. (1985) developed the cognitive interview to improve police interview techniques and obtain more accurate information from eyewitnesses. It consists of four main stages.
Four main Stages of Cognitive Interview
Context Reinstatement
The witness tries to mentally recreate an image of the situation, including details of the environment, such as the weather conditions and their emotional state, including their feelings at the time of the incident. These may act as retrieval cues (context-dependent cues) to improve recall.
Report Everything
The interviewer encourages the witness to recall all details about the event, even though these details may seem to be unimportant. This may highlight details which have been overlooked and trigger other memories.
Recall of Changed Perspective
The witness tries to mentally recreate the situation from different points of view, e.g. describing what another witness present at the scene would have seen. This promotes a more holistic view of the event which might enhance recall and reduce the influence of schemas. Schemas are mental structures of preconceived ideas.
Recall in Reversed Order
The witness is asked to recall the scene in a different chronological order, e.g. from the end to the beginning. This should verify the accuracy of the witnesses’ account and reduce the possibility that recall may be influenced by schemas/expectations.
Enhanced Cognitive Interview
Fisher (1987) added additional guidelines for police interviews;
Advantages of The Cognitive Interview
+ Geiselman et al. (1985) showed participants a video of a simulated crime and tested recall using the cognitive interview, standard interview or hypnosis. The cognitive interview led to the most information being recalled by the eyewitnesses
+ Fisher et al. (1990) trained real police officers in Miami to use the enhanced cognitive interview when interviewing eyewitnesses. They found that on average there was a 46% increase in the amount of information witnesses gave. 90% of the information that could be verified was accurate.
Disadvantages of The Cognitive Interview