Sexual Violation by Rape
Section 128(1)(a) CA - 20 Yrs Imp
R v Koroheke (Genitalia)
R v Cox (Consent)
R v Gutuama (Objective test)
Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection
Section 128(1)(b) CA - 20 Yrs Imp
R v Koroheke (Genitalia)
R v Cox (Consent)
R v Gutuama (Objective test)
Sexual Conduct with a Child under 12 (1), (2) and (3)
Section 132(1) or (2) or (3) CA - 14/10 Yrs Imp
R v Koroheke (Genitalia) (1)
R v Court (Indecency) (3)
R v Forrest and Forrest (Proof of age)
Sexual Conduct with a Young Person under 16 (1)
Section 134(1) CA - 10 Yrs Imp
R v Koroheke (Genitalia)
R v Forrest and Forrest (Proof of age)
Sexual Conduct with a Young Person under 16 (3)
Section 134(3) CA - 7 Yrs Imp
R v Court (Indecency)
R v Forrest and Forrest (Proof of age)
Indecent Assault
Section 135 CA - 7 Yrs Imp
R v Leeson (Indecent Assault)
R v Court (Indecency)
Attempted Sexual Violation
Section 129(1) CA - 10 Yrs Imp
R v Harpur (Conduct)
Assault with Intent to commit Sexual Violation
Section 129(2) CA - 10 Yrs Imp
R v Harpur (Conduct)
Robbery
Section 234(1) CA - 10 Yrs Imp
R v Skivington - (Claim of Right) R v Lapier - (Taking) R v Cox - (Possession) R v Maihi - ( Accompanied by Violence) Peneha v Police - (Actions of the Defendant) R v Broughton - (Threat of Violence)
Aggravated Robbery - GBH
Section 235(a) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
DPP v Smith - (GBH Meaning)
Aggravated Robbery - Together With
Section 235(b) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
R v Galey - (Being together intent)
R v Joyce - (Persons present)
Aggravated Robbery - Being armed with an Offensive Weapon
Section 235(c) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
Assault with intent to Rob - GBH
Section 236(1)(a) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
Assault with intent to Rob - Being armed with an Offensive Weapon
Section 236(1)(b) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
Assault with intent to Rob - Being together with
Section 236(1)(c) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
Assault with intent to Rob - Assault
Section 236(2) CA - 7 Yrs Imp
Abduction
Section 208 (a) or (b) or (c) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
R v Crossan - (Take away vs Detains) R v Wellard - (Essence of kidnapping) R v Pryce - (Detaining concept) R v Cox - (Consent) R v Mohi - (Taking away intent)
Kidnapping
Section 209 (a) or (b) or (c) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
R v Crossan - (Take away vs Detains) R v Wellard - (Essence of kidnapping) R v Pryce - (Detaining concept) R v Cox - (Consent) R v Mohi - (Taking away intent)
Abduction of a Young Person under 16 (1)
Section 210(1) CA - 7 Yrs Imp
R v Forrest and Forrest - (Proof of age)
Abduction of a Young Person under 16 (2)
Section 210(2) CA - 7 Yrs Imp
R v Forrest and Forrest - (Proof of age)
Wounding with intent to cause GBH
Section 188(1) CA - 14 Yrs Imp
R v Taisalika - (GBH Intent)
R v Waters - (Wounds)
R v Rapana and Murray - (Disfigures)
DPP v Smith (GBH)
Wounding with intent
Section 188(2) CA - 7 Yrs Imp
R v Taisalika - (GBH Intent) R v Harney (Recklessness) R v Waters - (Wounds) R v Rapana and Murray - (Disfigures) DPP v Smith (GBH)
Injuring with Intent (GBH)
Section 189(1) CA - 10 Yrs Imp
R v Taisalika - (GBH Intent)
DPP v Smith - (GBH)
R v Donovan - (Injures)
Injuring with Intent (Injures)
Section 189(2) CA - 5 Yrs Imp
R v Taisalika - (GBH Intent)
R v Harney - (Recklessness)
R v Donovan - (Injures)