Ford Pinto and GM
Issue: The Pinto’s fuel tank was placed behind the rear axle, making it prone to rupture and fires in rear-end collisions
Corporate Decision: Ford engineers knew of the defect but chose not to design as it would delay product and add costs. Internal memo reveals a cost-benefit analysis showed it was cheaper to pay for lawsuits than to fix the design
McDonald’s Happy Meal
Issue: The Happy Meal bundles food with a toy, directly targeting children causing child obesity, manipulative marking, and exploiting vulnerable customers
Corporate Decision: Management argued everyone was fine with the toy even though competitors are introducing healtheir options
McDonald’s Hoty Coffee
Issue: A woman suffered third-degree burns after spilling the coffee which was far hotter than typically brewed coffee. McDonalds maintained their position highlighting the high serving temperature to preserve taste longer and reduce refill costs. With over 700 prior burn complaints, McDonalds continued their practice until a woman sued and won.
Exxon Valdez
Deepwater Horizon
Nestle
Issue: Aggressive promotion of infant formula in developing countries, sometimes misleading mothers into believing formula was superior to breastfeeding. This led to malnutrition and infant deaths when formula was mixed with unsafe water.
Beech-Nut and No Apple-Juice Juice
Beech-Nut marketed and sold “100% Apple Juice” for infants and children when in reality, it was composed of sugar and corn syrup. The company continued selling the product even after internal testing revealed it was fraudulent. Management attempted to sell of the no apple juice substance at fire prices but was caught.
FTC vs Colgate Palmolive Co
Issue
* Colgate-Palmolive ran a TV advertisement for its shaving cream, claiming it could soften sandpaper enough to allow a razor to glide smoothly over it.
* In reality, the demonstration was deceptive: the “sandpaper” shown was actually simulated with sand sprinkled on glass, not real sandpaper.
* The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged Colgate-Palmolive with false and misleading advertising.
Corporate Decision
* The company defended itself by arguing that the ad was merely “puffery” and consumers would not take it literally.
Bernie Madoff Ponzi Scheme
Arthur Anderson
Martha Stewart
Milgram experiment criticism of virtue ethics
Vioxx
Apple In: Severe Employee Abuse
Nike – Sweatshops
Chicken