LOGIC Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

is an assertion that can either be true or false.

A

statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Statements which do not use connectives are called

A

atomic or
simple statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

statements which use connectives are
called

A

compound statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

most common connectives and their symbols

A

and/but ∧
or ∨
If, then ⇒
if and only if ⇔

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Simple Statements

A

Assertion p p is true
Negation ¬p ¬p is false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Compound Statements

A

Conjunction p ∧ q p and q
Disjunction p ∨ q p or q
Conditional p ⇒ q If p, then q
Biconditional p ⇔ q p if and only if q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A compound statement of the form If p, then q, written symbolically as p ⇒ q, is called

A

conditional statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A compound statement of the form p if and only if q, or ”p if q” written symbolically as p ⇔ q, is called a

A

biconditional statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Two statements are said to be equivalent whenever they have ”identical truth tables”

A

Logical Equivalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

is a statement whose truth value is true regardless of the truth value of the atomic statements.

A

tautology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

is a statement whose truth value is false regardless of the truth value of the atomic statements.

A

contradiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

i.) [ p ∧ (p ⇒ q)] ⇒ q
ii.) [ (p ⇒ q) ∧ p] ⇒ q

A

Law of Detachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

i.) (p ∧ q) ⇒ q
ii.) (p ∧ q) ⇒ p

A

Law of Simplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

i.) p ⇒ (p ∨ q)
ii.) q ⇒ (p ∨ q)

A

Law of Addition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

[ (p ∨ q) ∧ ¬p] ⇒ q

A

Modus Tollendo Ponens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

¬(¬p) ⇔ p

A

Law of Double Negation

17
Q

i.) (p ∧ q) ⇔ (q ∧ p)
ii.) (p ∨ q) ⇔ (q ∨ p)

A

Commutative Laws

18
Q

i.) [(p ∧ q) ∧ r] ⇔ [p ∧ (q ∧ r)]
ii.) [(p ∨ q) ∨ r] ⇔ [p ∨ (q ∨ r)]

A

Associative Laws

19
Q

[(p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ r)] ⇒ (p ⇒ r)

A

Transitivity of Implication

20
Q

i.) [ p ∧ (q ∨ r)] ⇔ [(p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)]
ii.) [ p ∨ (q ∧ r)] ⇔ [(p ∨ q) ∧ (p ∨ r)]

A

Distributive Laws

21
Q

(p ⇒ q) ⇔ (¬q ⇒ ¬p)

A

Law of Contrapositive

22
Q

i.) [(p ⇒ q) ∧ (p ⇒ ¬q)] ⇔ ¬p
ii.) [ p ⇒ (q ∧ ¬q)] ⇔ ¬p

A

Law of Absurdity

23
Q

¬(p ∧ ¬p)

A

Law of Contradiction

24
Q

p ∨ ¬p

A

Law of Excluded Middle

25
[(p ∧ ¬q) ⇒ (r ∧ ¬r)] ⇒ (p ⇒ q)
Reductio Ad Absurdum
26
[(p ⇒ q) ∧ (r ⇒ q)] ⇒ [(p ∨ r) ⇒ q
Proof by Cases
27
i. ¬(p ∧ q) ≡ ¬p ∨ ¬q ii. ¬(p ∨ q) ≡ ¬p ∧ ¬q
Law of De Morgan
28
Other Logically Equivalent Statements
p ⇒ q ≡ ¬p ∨ q ≡ ¬q ⇒ ¬p p ∨ q ≡ ¬p ⇒ q p ∧ q ≡ ¬(p ⇒ ¬q) ¬(p ⇒ q) ≡ p ∧ ¬q p ⇒ (q ∧ r) ≡ (p ⇒ q) ∧ (p ⇒ r) p ⇒ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ⇒ q) ∨ (p ⇒ r) (p ∧ q) ⇒ r ≡ (p ⇒ r) ∨ (q ⇒ r)
29
Logical Equivalence Involving Biconditional
p ⇔ q ≡ (p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ p) ≡ ¬p ⇔ ¬q ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (¬p ∧ ¬q)