Defining reaction time
What can reaction times tell us?
• Provide an indirect measure of mental processes
• Specifically, measuring reaction times can tell us about:
• The nature of mental processes
• The effect different stimuli has on mental processes
Example 1 of reaction time: Shepard and Metzler (1971)
• Results suggest that participants imagined rotating the object in order to solve the task
Example 2 of reaction time: Stroop effect (1935)
types of reaction time experiments
1 type of stimulus; one type of response
more than 1 stimulus; each has its own specific choice
more than 1 stimulus; but ppt only needs to respond to 1
Measuring Brain Activity
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
• Utilises the fact that the uptake of glucose is greater in active brain areas
• Some preparation is required
– a radioactive substance that mimics glucose is injected into the bloodstream
• Active cells take up this radioactive substance more readily
Subtraction method (PET)
eval of PET
• Creates relatively high spatial resolution images of the brain
- BUT
• Poor temporal resolution
• Individuals are also exposed to radioactive substances, which limits the number of scans that can be carried out
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
• Signals are used to create high spatial resolution images of the brain
Evaluation of FMRI
• In comparison to PET: • Nothing needs to be injected into the participants • Offers better spatial resolution o BUT • Poor temporal resolution
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Event related potentials
• Researchers are typically interested in EEG waves produced in response to psychological events (e.g., presentation of a stimulus) - Event related potentials (ERPs)
• ERP components - peaks observed in the ERP
e.g., P300 and N400
• Named after their polarity and latency
• Researchers are typically interested in EEG waves produced in response to psychological events (e.g., presentation of a stimulus) - Event related potentials (ERPs)
• Typically, researchers are interested in how task conditions affect the amplitude and latency of specific ERP components
Evaluation of ERPs
• Excellent temporal resolution
o BUT
• Poor spatial resolution
How can we measure happiness?
Example: Oxford Happiness Questionnaire - Short scale (Hills & Argyle, 2002)
• Items tend to take the form of either being a closed question
or statement
• Participants’ responses are restricted
• Psychological scales provide quantitative data about
the characteristic of interest
• However, on a cautionary note:
• No insight into why a participants chose a specific response
• Might be difficult for participants to provide a ‘clear cut’ response
Acquiescence bias
= Refers to the tendency to respond positively to all items
Response bias
=Refers to the tendency to give the same response to all items
Developing test items