Memory Flashcards

(139 cards)

1
Q

Explain what/when was Sperling’s investigation

A

An investigation of the sensory register

1960

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the method behind Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register

A

In a laboratory experiment, participants were shown a grid with three rows of four letters for 50 milliseconds.

They then had to immediately recall either the whole grid, or a randomly chosen row indicated by a tone (high, medium or low) played straight after the grid was shown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the results behind Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register

A

When participants had to recall the whole grid, they only managed to recall four or five letters on average. When a particular row was indicated, participants could recall an average of three items, no matter which row had been selected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the conclusion behind Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register

A

The participants did not know which row was going to be selected, so it could be concluded that they would have been able to recall three items from any row, therefore almost the whole grid was held in their sensory register. They could not report the whole grid because the trace faded before they could finish recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluate Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register

A

• Because this was a laboratory experiment, it was highly scientific.

• The variables could be controlled, and it would be easy for someone to replicate the study.

• However, the artificial setting of the study means that it lacks ecological validity- people do not normally have to recall letters in response to a sound, so the result might not represent what would happen in the real world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register suggest

A

Theoretically participants should have been able
to remember 4 items from a row, however approximately only 3 were remembered.

This suggests that sensory memory cannot hold
information for long.

Information decays rapidly in the sensory store!

This supports the existence of a sensory store!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) experiment

A

Showed participants a list of 20 words, presented one at a time and then asked them to recall.

This is called the serial positioning effect. “When asking poeple to remember a list of words which is greater than the capacity of short term memory they have a tendency to remember word from the beginning and end of the list”.

It is compromised of the primay effect. “The tendency for people to remember the first 5 or so words from the beginnning of the list.”

And the recency effect. “The tendency fo people to remember the last 5 or so words from the end of the list.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Draw the diagram of Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) Multi-store model of memory

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain how Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) supports the multi-store memory model

A

The primacy effect occurs because the first words are best rehearsed and transferred to LTM.

The recency effect occurs because these are the last words to be presented. Therefore they are fresh and in STM at the start of recall.Therefore this supports the STM Store and the importance of rehearsal!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain STM in relation to the Multi-store memory model

A

• Information here will disappear (decay) if it is not rehearsed.

• Information will also disappear if new information enters STM and pushes out the original information due to STM’s limited capacity. This is called displacement.

  • STM capacity
    George Miller( 1956) found that most people can retain about seven items in STM. Some remember five, some nine, so he called the capacity of STM seven plus or minus two. Some factors affect our STM. (For example, numbers recall is better than letters, and acoustic coding tends to be better than visual coding.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain LTM in relation to the multi-store memory model

A

• Information is moved from STM to LTM via rehearsal.

• Initially rehearsal just maintains the information in STM but the more something is rehearsed the lasting the memory will be.

• This is called ‘maintenance rehearsal’ which is verbal.

• Remember: LTM has an unlimited capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain sensory register

A

Sensory register:

• A stimulus from the environment

• Several stores- one for each of our senses. Since it receives information for our senses it has a huge capacity, but a duration less than half a second. Therefore, information will only pass from the sensory register to the short-term memory store If we pay attention to it

• Iconic - visual information is coded visually

• Echoic-sounds or auditory information is coded acoustically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain how the primacy effect study supports the multi-store memory model

A
  1. The Primacy Effect- research shows that participants are able to recall the first few items of a list better than those from the middle. The MSM explains this because earlier items will have been rehearsed better and transferred to LTM. If rehearsal is prevented by an interference task, the effect disappears.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain how the recency study supports the multi-store memory model

A
  1. The Recency Effect- Participants also tend to remember the last few items better than those from the middle of the list. As STM has a capacity of around 7 items, the words in the middle of the list, if not rehearsed, are displaced from STM by the last few words heard. These last words are still in STM at the end of the experiment and can be recalled.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain how a study on people with Korsakoff’s syndrome supports the multi-store memory model

A
  1. People with Korsakoff’s syndrome (amnesia that is mostly caused by chronic alcoholism) provide support the model. They can recall the last items in a list (unimpaired recency effect), suggesting an unaffected STM. However, their LTM is very poor. This supports the model by showing that STM and LTM are separate stores.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain shallice and Warrington (1970) in relation to the multi-store memory model

A

Studied a patient known as KF who had amnesia. They found that KF’s short term memory for digits was very small when they were reading out loud to him. But recall was much better when he could read them to himself.

KF had poor STM recall for auditory stimuli, but increasingly accurate recall for visual stimuli. This, alongside KF being able to differentiate and recall both verbal and non-verbal sounds but struggle recalling with recalling auditory stimuli suggests that there may be multiple types of STM. This suggests that that the MSM incorrectly presents STM as a single, unitary store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain Craik and Watkins (1973) in relation to the multi-store memory model

A

Amount of rehearsal is important!

• However, Craik and Watkins (1973) found that this is wrong!

• Type is what really matters

  • Maintenance: only maintained in the STM
  • Elaborative rehearsal: linking existing knowledge or meaning

They suggest that elaborative rehearsal, instead of prolonged rehearsal, is needed to transfer information from the STM into the LTM, by making links with existing knowledge. This goes against the multi-store memory model. The idea that memory will be maintained if rehearsed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain artificial material in relation to the multi-store memory model

A
  • Research uses digits, letters or constants syllables without meaning. These tasks lack mundane realism as the study is artificial. Therefore,the studies supporting the MSM will have low external validity thus making the model less valid to be generalised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain how we know there is more than one type of LTM

A

There is a lot of research to suggest that similarly to STM, it is not a unitary store. We have different LTM stores for facts and memories of events. This also does not represent that some types of LTM can be retrieved unconsciously (e.g. procedural) whilst others must be retrieved consciously (e.g. semantic), which is not reflected in the universal process of information being consciously transferred to the STM during the process of retrieval.

The case of Clive Wearing supports that there are different types of LTM. Following a brain infection, Wearing’s procedural memory seemed intact (e.g. being able to dress himself and even play the piano), but his episodic memory was severely damaged. When his wife left the room and returned, even after only a few minutes, he would greet her as if they had not seen each other for years. He kept a diary in which he constantly wrote that he was just regaining consciousness every few minutes. This supports that there are different stores for different types of LTM.

Brain scanning studies show that different areas of the brain are active when performing tasks involving different types of LTM. This supports that types of LTM are physically different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is duration of memory

A

How long (in time) a memory lasts before it is no longer accessible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Key ideas of duration of memory in the STM and LTM

A
  • STM and LTM differ in duration

Short term memories:

last for a very short period of time, unless they are rehearsed or paid attention to. Therefore STM is limited in duration. You can think of STM like a notepad where we scribble down things we need to remember for a short while.

Unfortunately the note pad can’t hold very much information and the ink fades away.

Long term memories:

can last anywhere from 2 minutes to 100 years. LTM has an unlimited duration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Explain what/ when was Peterson and Peterson’s study

A

Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM

1959

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Explain the method behind Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM

A

Participants were shown nonsense trigrams (3 random consonants, e.g. CVM) and asked to recall them after either 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds.

During the pause, they were asked to count backwards in threes from a given number. This was an ‘interference task’ to prevent them from repeating the letters internally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Explain the results behind Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM

A

After 3 seconds, participants could recall about 80% of trigrams correctly.

After 18 seconds, only 10% were recalled correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Explain the conclusion behind Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM
When rehearsal is prevented, very little can stay in STM for longer than about 18 seconds he found that increasing retention intervals decreased the accuracy of recall of consonant syllables in 24 undergraduates, when counting down from a 3 digit number (preventing mental rehearsal).
26
Explain the evaluation behind Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM
• The results are likely to be reliable- it was a laboratory experiment where the variables can be tightly controlled. (Limited the effects of hte extraneous variables) • Only one stimulus was used- the duration of STM may depend on the type of stimulus. • Each participant saw many different trigrams. This could have led to confusion, meaning the first trigram was the only realistic trial. Relatively small sample and all students (not representative) The findings produced hold little ecological validity. This is due to the use of artificial stimuli which has little personal meaning to the participants, and so does not reflect their everyday experiences. This limits their generalisability and findings
27
Explain what/ when was Bahrick et al (1975) experiment
Bahrick et al - Very long-term memories (VLTMs) 1975
28
Explain the method behind Bahrick et al - Very long-term memories (VLTMs)
N= 392 were asked to list names of their ex-classmates (called a 'free-recall' test) They were then shown photos of students in their class and asked to recall their names
29
Explain the results behind Bahrick et al - Very long-term memories (VLTMs)
After 15 years: Participants could recognise about 90% of names through photo recognition They were about 60% accurate on free recall. After 48 years: After 48 years, free recall had decline to 30% accuracy. After 48 years photo-recognition was about 70% accurate.
30
Explain the conclusion behind Bahrick et al - Very long-term memories (VLTMs)
This study is evidence of VLTMs in a real-life setting. Recognition is better than recall, so there may be a huge store of information but it is not always easy to access all of it- you just need help to get to it.
31
Explain the evaluation behind Bahrick et al - Very long-term memories (VLTMs)
• This was a field experiment and has high ecological validity and can be generalised to real life (high external validity) due to the task reflecting what people generally do in real life • However, in a real-life study like this, it is hard to control all the variables, making these findings less reliable- there is no way of knowing exactly why information was recalled well. It shows better recall than other studies on LTM but this may be because meaningful information is stored better. - This type of information could be rehearsed, increasing the rate of recall. • This means the results cannot be generalised to other types of information held in LTM.
32
What is coding of memory
The process of converting information from one form to another
33
Explain what/ when was Baddeley’s study
Baddeley- Investigating coding in STM and LTM 1966
34
Explain the method behind Baddeley (1966)- Investigating coding in STM and LTM
Participants were given four sets of words that were either acoustically similar, acoustically dissimilar, semantically similar or semantically dissimilar. The experiment used an independent groups design- participants were asked to recall the words either immediately or following a 30-minute task.
35
Explain the results/ conclusion behind Baddeley (1966)- Investigating coding in STM and LTM
Results: STM: Worse performance for acoustically similar words. The STM relies heavily on acoustic coding. The similar sounds interfered with each other LTM: Worse performance for semantically similar words. The LTM relies more on semantic (meaning-based) coding. Words with similar meanings interfere with each other Conclusion: The patterns of confusion between similar words suggest that LTM is more likely to rely on semantic coding and STM on acoustic coding
36
Explain the evaluation behind Baddeley (1966)- Investigating coding in STM and LTM
Positives: Baddeley’s research provided strong evidence that STM and LTM are coded differently (acoustically vs. semantically). This was one of the first studies to support the distinction between STM and LTM, contributing to the development of the multi-store model of memory (Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968). It helped psychologists better understand how memory systems function and how information is processed and stored. Controlled lab experiment with a high control of variables. This means that there is a high interval validity. (Results are due to change in the IV) Every participant experiences the same word list. Therefore, this increases reliability. As a result the study can be replicated. Limitations: Practical Limitation – Limited Real-World Application: Baddeley’s study involved recalling word lists, which is very different from how we usually use memory in everyday life (e.g. remembering faces, events, emotions). The task was unnatural, the findings may not apply to real-world memory use. 🔚 This reduces the practical usefulness of the research for understanding memory in real-life settings, like education or the legal system. This is another study that lacks ecological validity through the use of artificial stimuli and the unnatural task. Therefore, cannot be generalised to real life. • There are other types of LTM and other methods of coding which this experiment did not consider. Third variable therefore lacks internal validity. • The experiment used an independent groups design so there was not any control over participant variables. Therefore, the study may lack internal validity as participant variables can affect results.
37
Explain what/ when was Jacob’s experiment
Jacobs - The capacity of STM 1887
38
Explain the method behind Jacobs - The capacity of STM
Participants were presented with a string of letters or digits. They had to repeat them back in the same order. The number of digits or letters increased until the participant failed to recall the sequence correctly.
39
Explain the results behind Jacobs - The capacity of STM
The majority of the time, participants recalled about 9 digits and about 7 letters This capacity increased with age during childhood.
40
Explain the conclusion behind Jacobs - The capacity of STM
Based on the range of results, Jacobs concluded that STM has a limited storage capacity of 5-9 items. Individual differences were found, such as STM increasing with age, possibly due to use of memory techniques such as chunking. Digits may have been easier to recall as there were only 10 different digits to remember, compared to 26 letters.
41
Explain the evaluation behind Jacobs - The capacity of STM
Positive: other studies have found similar results supporting its validity Negative: • Jacobs research is artificial and lacks ecological validity due to the unnatural task and use of artificial stimuli. Therefore, the research lacks ecological validity. • Meaningful information may be recalled better, perhaps showing STM to have an even greater capacity. • Also, the previous sequence recalled by the participants might have confused them on future trials. ( order of effects) Very old research therefore may lack temporal validity Lacked adequate control over extraneous variables Confounding variables- noisy room or difficult word lists, may have had a greater influence on accuracy of recall, leading to unreliable results.
42
Explain George Miller (1956) on capacity of memory
Miller (1956) noted that things come in sevens: 7 notes on musical scales, 7 days of the week. This suggests that the capacity of STM is 7 items (plus or minus 2 whilst the capacity of LTM is thought to be unlimited. Miller argued that our capacity for remembering information can be increased if we chunk items together.If we find links between things and group them together then we will remember more.
43
Evaluate George Miller (1956)
• Miller may have overestimated the capacity of the STM • Cowan (2001) reviewed other research and concluded that the capacity of STM was only about 4 chunks. The findings produced hold little ecological validity. This is due to the use of artificial stimuli which has little personal meaning to the participants, and so does not reflect their everyday experiences. This limits their generalisability and findings
44
What’s is memory
Memory: The process by which we retain information about events that have happened in the past
45
What is short term memory
The information we are currently aware of, or thinking about. The information found in short term memory comes from paying attention to sensory memories
46
What is long term memory
Continual storage of information which is largely outside of our awareness, but can be called into working memory to be used when needed.
47
Features of coding, capacity and duration of STM compared to LTM
STM: Duration: 18-30 seconds. Capacity: seven +/- two items. Coding: primarily acoustic. LTM: Duration: unlimited. Capacity: unlimited. Coding: primarily semantic but can be others.
48
What’s is capacity in memory
Capacity is the amount of memory which is available to be stored in your memory
49
What is coding in memory
The format in which information is stored in the various memory stores
50
Explain encoding
• This is the way intormation is changed so it can be stored in memory. • Information enters the brain via the senses but is then stored in different forms. 1) Visual 2) ACOUSTiC 3) Semantic There are two sub-divisions: 1. Explicit (declarative) as you can put it into words. These have to be consciously thought about to be recalled. Often formed through several combined memories. These include semantic and episodic memories. 2. Implicit (non-declarative) which is more difficult to put into words. These can be recalled without conscious thought. These include procedural memories.
51
What is episodic memory
Personal experiences, these are time stamped. Conscious effort to recall. Strength of memory is influenced by emotion. Episodic memory describes those memories which have some kind of personal meaning to us, alongside details as to when and how these events occurred, as well as the associated people and places.
52
What is semantic memory
Concerns factual knowledge an individual has learned. These are not time stamped. Linked to episodic as new knowledge is linked to experience. Semantic memories describe our memories of the world and the associated knowledge e.g the ability to use information related to one concept to help us understand another.
53
Explain where episodic memory is stored
Right Prefrontal Cortex: The prefrontal cortex in the forward part of the frontal lobe is associated with initial coding of episodic memory. Hippocampus: Memories of the different parts of an event are located in the different visual, auditory, olfactory areas of the brain, but are connected together in the hippocampus to create a memory of an episode.
54
Explain where semantic memory is stored
The Hippocampus: Some disagreement over which brain areas are involved in the semantic memory however the hippocampus is thought to be involved. Left Prefrontal Cortex: Coding associated with the frontal and temporal lobes.
55
What is procedural memory
Concerned with learning motor skills. Without conscious effort. Difficult to explain in words. Also involved in language.
56
Explain where procedural memory is stored
Motor Cortex and prefrontal cortex: These areas are associated with procedural LTM and aid in the memories of how to walk etc. Cerebellum: The cerebellum helps with timing and coordination of movements, making them smooth and precise. Recent research also suggests a role in higher cognitive processes.
57
Expain supporting clinical evidence for the idea that different memory stores are in the LTM
• Henry Molaison and Clive Wearing Episodic memory were severely impaired. They had difficulty forming new experiences after they were affected -Episodic memory severely impaired- For H.M he could not form new experiences after the surgery but could recall his childhood (name,family etc) but struggled to remember 11 years before the surgery. He can’t recall aging and recognize himself in pictures. -For C.W he has a memory span of second, can’t recall past events expect who his wife is and that he has children • Semantic memory partially impaired -In the case of H.M he could remember facts learned before surgery (e.g. WWII, Wall Street Crash) and details of his family/name/childhood facts but could not form new semantic memories. understood the meaning of words and language was intact -For C.W he still can recall general knowledge and knows that he has children and a wife. He also understood meaning of words and language was intact • Procedural memory was not impaired -H.M learned Tennis late in life and improved at drawing a mirror drawing task pf a five pointed star -For C.W he still knows how to play the piano • Supports Tulving's view that the LTM is not a unitary store
58
Explain the case study of Clive Wearing
Cause: Brain infection (herpes simplex virus) damaged his hippocampus. Effect on LTM: Episodic memory severely damaged – couldn’t remember past events or form new events (seeing his wife leave the room) but remembered who is wife is shown through his strong emotion reaction to her Procedural memory intact – could still play piano and get dressed. Semantic memory partially intact – knew he is a father with. Wife and children but not his children’s names or ages. Other signs: Kept writing in a diary that he had just “woken up,” showing his memory reset every few minutes. Supports the idea that LTM is not unitary – it has separate stores for episodic, semantic, and procedural memory.
59
Explain the backstory behind the case study of Henry Molaison
Cause: Suffered from epilepsy after a head injury at age 7. Treatment: At age 27, underwent brain surgery (removal of parts of temporal lobe, including hippocampus and amygdala) to treat seizures. Outcome: develop severe amnesia- Episodic memory severely impaired- For H.M he could not form new experiences after the surgery but could recall his childhood (name,family etc) but struggled to remember 11 years before the surgery • Semantic memory partially impaired -In the case of H.M he could remember facts learned before surgery but could not form new semantic memories Procedural memory was not impaired -H.M learned Tennis late in life and improved at drawing a mirror drawing task pf a five pointed star
60
Explain the procedure behind Henry and Molaison
Brenda Milner's early tests were simple recall tasks, testing H.M.'s ability to recall events from his childhood, from his adult life before the operation and from his experiences after the operation. She also tested his short and long term memory recall. Finally, she tested his other cognitive faculties, like IQ, perception and general knowledge. Milner also tested H.M. with maze tasks. H.M. attempted to trace the correct route through the maze with his finger. Milner then tested him over and over with the same maze to see if H.M. would remember the route, even if he didn't remember having attempted the task before. In the 1962 case study, Milner asked H.M. to copy a five-pointed star by drawing between the lines of a template. However, H.M. could only see the reflection of the star and his hand in a memory. This made the task difficult. As with the maze task, Milner asked H.M. to re-attempt the task many times, to see if he grew more skilled at the procedure even though he didn't remember doing it before. Other tests were carried out on H.M.. For example, the effect of reinforcement and punishment was investigated, to see if mild electric shocks would help H.M. to remember correct answers. Later, under the direction of Suzanne Corkin, brain scanning technology was used to improve our understanding of H.M.'s condition.
61
Explain the results behind Henry Molaison
Henry Molaison (H.M.): Memory loss: Developed severe amnesias and can only form new memories for 30 seconds Old memories: Remembered childhood and teenage memories well (before age 16). Cognitive abilities: -Normal perception, above-average IQ, good language, and stable personality. -Poor sense of smell. Episodic memory severely impaired- -Repeated same childhood stories without knowing when he respected it. -Didn’t recognise his older self in photos (no memory of aging).Could remember childhood and some long-term memories before the operation although had gaps in memory from the 11 years before surgery. Semantic memory partially impaired Knew major historical facts (e.g. WWII, Wall Street Crash) before surgery -new details abotu his family and his name and childhood facts -Understood meaning of words and language was intact Procedural memory: No improvement in maze tasks, but showed learning in mirror star tracing task (even though he couldn’t remember doing it). -Later in life learned how to play tennis - Supports separate LTM stores – especially difference between episodic and procedural memory.
62
Explain the conclusion behind Henry Molaison
Milner's qualitative data shows a clear difference between short term and long term memory. They suggest that the hippocampus plays a vital role in transforming short term memories into long term memories, because this was something H.M. (whose hippocampus had been removed in the operation) couldn't do. Milner's quantitative data and the later qualitative data suggests a more complex structure for memory. H.M. did not improve at the maze task because, when he figured out the correct route through the maze, he immediately forgot it. However, he got better at the star task, despite forgetting his previous attempts. Later in life, he learned to play tennis. This suggests H.M. remembered skills even if he forgot events. H.M wast test through recall test and remembered some items of general knowledge (the moon landings, the Kennedy assassination), even though he couldn't remember the events taking place.Additionally, some aspects of his episodic memory was intact (childhood, name and family) Milner termed this sort of memory "unconscious memory", but Eron Tulving later termed it procedural memory (skills) and semantic memory (general knowledge) and procedural memory
63
Evaluate Henry Molaison’s case study
Generalisbility- Scoville & Milner reviewed 9 patients who had undergone resection surgery, but the others were sufferers of schizophrenia and depression whose symptoms interfered with memory testing. H.M. was unusual in that he suffered from "clean" amnesia - his memory loss was his only problem. This makes him much more representative of ordinary people. On the other hand, H.M was a unique case as it was only performed once by Scoville Thi means we cannot find out how normal H.M was as we never recorded his memory before the operation Reliability- Milner used tried-and-tested memory tests and puzzles. Most of these had been designed by other memory researchers and many of them were replicated on H.M. by later researchers like Suzanne Corkin. They all showed consistent results with H.M. - а great example of standardised procedures and test-retest reliability.On the other hand, as H.M is dead it is difficult to replicate, Valdity- The strength of H.M. as a case study is the validity of his condition: H.M. suffered from "pure" or "clean" amnesia with few other symptoms and was willing to work with researchers to understand the brain. Ethics- H.M. consented to his surgery in 1953. No one warned him about the memory side-effects because no one understood the function of the hippocampus at that time. H.M. continued to consent to taking part in research for the rest of his life - every time it was explained to him, which was many times, daily, for over 50 years! Critics point out that H.M. was in no position to withhold his consent - he was entirely dependent on the researchers for his care and did not understand his situation. It could be argued that H.M. was a "human guinea pig" whose sad condition was exploited by researchers.
64
Supporting neuroimaging evidence for the idea that there are different stores in the LTM
• Brain scans have been conducted whilst performing memory tasks. • Tulving (1994) found that episodic and semantic memories were both recalled from the prefrontal cortex. • This area is divided into two one on each hemisphere of the brain. • Left prefrontal cortex – semantic memories • Right prefrontal cortex – episodic memories. •Supports the idea that different types of memory are located in different physical areas of the brain.
65
Supporting in real life application for the idea that there are different stores in the LTM
Belleville et al, 2006: Midl cognitive impairments most commonly affect episodic memories and so an increased understanding of episodic memory, alongside the differences between different types of LTM, may lead to improved, increasingly targeted treatments for mild cognitive impairments. • Specific treatments developed to help with episodic memory impairment especially as people get older they developed mil cognitive impairment. ( 28 participants with MCI and 17 healthy controls used). • The participants were trained face- name association (associating a name with a face) , list recall (remembering a list of words) and text memory (remembering details from a story) • Trained participants performed better on a test of episodic memory after training, than the control group - This study supports the idea that episodic memory is a distinct type of LTM, because it can be specifically targeted and improved. - It also shows that understanding the different types of LTM (like episodic vs procedural) can lead to better treatments for memory problems in older people.
66
Explain the idea behind Cohen and Squire of the different store of LTM
• Cohen and Squire (1980) disapprove Tulving idea of the LT stores and think that there are only two types of LTM. • Procedural- non-declarative • Declarative (combination of episodic and semantic). Declarative memories must be recalled consciously (i.e. episodic and semantic), whilst non-declarative memories may be recalled unconsciously (i.e. procedural). They argued that episodic and semantic memory are too similar and should not be separate stores. However, this is a different classification and organisation system as the one used by Tulving, suggesting that his depiction of LTM is not entirely accurate.
67
Explain Baddeley and Hitch (1974) in relation to the working memory model
Believed memory is not just one store but a number of different stores: • 2 visual tasks at once showed poorer performance compared to 1 visual and 1 verbal means no interruption. This shows separate stores for visual and verbal information • Focused on STM ONLY and believed it was not a unitary store (like MSM)!! • LTM i seen as a more passive store that holds previously learned material for use by the STM when needed. The supports the idea of a STM that is not a single unitary store
68
Draw the working memory model
69
What’s is the function of the central executive on the working memory model and give an example
Key component in model: • Functions: • Direct attention to tasks • The central executive decides what working memory to pay attention to. • E.G, two activities sometimes come into conflict such as driving a car and talking. Rather than hitting a cyclist who is wobbling all over the road, it is preferable to stop talking and concentrate on driving. The central executive directs attention and gives priority to particular activities.
70
Explain the central executive on the working memory model
• Limited Capacity - Data arrives from the senses but it can't hold it for long. • Baddeley (1986) uses the metaphor of a company boss to describe the way in which the central executive operates. Makes decisions about which issues deserve attention and which should be ignored. • They also select strategies but can only do a limited number of things at the same time. The boss of a company will collect information from a number of different sources such as from the inner ear and eyes and information held in a large database (LTM).
71
Explain the phonological loop in relation to the working memory model
Limited Capacity • Deals with auditory information and preserves word order - Inner Ear • Baddeley (1986) further subdivided it into: • Phonological store (holds words heard) • Articulatory process (holds words heard/seen and silently repeated (looped) like an inner voice. This is a kind of maintenance rehearsal.
72
Explain the Visuo-spatial sketch pad in relation to the working memory model
• Visual and/or spatial information stored here - Inner Eye • Visual = what things look like • Spatial = relationships between things • Limited capacity • Logie (1995) suggested subdivision: • Visuo-cache (store)- store form and colour • Inner scribe- stores spatial movement and relationships
73
Explain the episodic buffer in relation to the working memory model
• Baddeley (2000) added episodic buffer as he realised the WWM needed a more general store. • Slave systems deal with specific types of information. (Phonological loop,visu-spatial sketcpad and episodic buffer) which are controlled by the central excecutive. • Buffer extra storage system but with limited capacity. • Integrates information which are processed by all the other stores in order to create a single, unified episode. It is crucial for linking STM and LTM
74
Explains supporting clinical evidence for the working memory model
• Shallice and Warrington (1970)- show that KF had very poor STM recall for auditory stimuli, but increased STM recall for visual stimuli. This suggests that the components of memory which process auditory and visual stimuli are separate (as described in the WMM through the phonological loop and the visuo-spatial sketchpad). • Supports the existence of a separate visual and acoustic store. Disapproves the MSM and the idea that the STM is a single unitary store
75
Evaluate the dual task performance in relation to the working memory model
Positives: Supporting research: Baddeley et al (1975)-Participants were given a visual tracing task (they had to track a moving light with a pointer). At the same time they were given one of two other tasksParticipants had more difficulty doing two visual tasks than doing both a visual and verbal task at the same time. This supports the idea that the central executive has a very limited processing capacity (as predicted by the WMM) and that the slave systems are in competition with each other for these tasks and resources. Supporting research: Klauer and Zhao (2004) -supported this idea by asking participants to carry out one of two primary tasks, either a visual task or a spatial task. At the same time as doing this task they were asked to do either a spatial interference task, a visual interference task or no secondary task (control condition). They found that performance of the spatial task was much poorer for people who were simultaneously carrying out the spatial distracter task than for people who were doing the visual distracter task and vice versa. Supporting brain studies: Studies using positron emission tomography (PET) scans have also provided evidence for separate spatial and visual systems. There appears to be more activity in the left half of the brain of people carrying out visual working memory tasks but more in the right half of the brain during spatial task. Limitations: Over-reliance on artificial tasks (Theoretical limitation): Although dual-task studies show that people struggle to do two tasks using the same store (e.g. two visual tasks), these tasks (e.g. tracking a light and describing angles) lack everyday relevance.This means findings might not generalise well to real-world multitasking, which often involves more complex and meaningful tasks.
76
Explain evidence for the episodic buffer in relation to the working memory model
• Baddeley et al (1987) • Participants were shown words and then wer told to immediate recall • Recall was much better for sentences (related words) than unrelated This suggest that participants were using semantic understanding from LTM to help with recall. This shows that not all information is stored in the phonological loop and viso-spatial sketch pad and that the episodic buffer is used as a ‘general’ store. This is used as a limited capacity store that integrates different types of information from different sensory stores between the STM and LTM
77
Explain the lack of clarity behind the central executive system
• Baddeley (2003) “the CE is the most important but the least understood component of working memory The term ‘process' is vague, and the central executive may be made up of several sub-components or even be part of a larger component itself in working memory. This lack of a comprehensive explanation for each component of WMM draws doubts about the accuracy of its depiction of working memory.
78
Supporting: Studies of the word length effect support the phonological loop
• Baddeley et al. (1975)- word length effect: People can recall more short words than long words. This is because there is a finite space for rehearsal in the articulatory process. - WLE (word length effect) disappears if a person is given an articulatory suppression task. This blocks rehearsal, providing that the phonological loop relies on silent repetition. This shows that the phonological loop rehearses information verbally and that the system of recall is time-based not a number of items like in MSM.
79
Explain brain scanning studies supporting the working memory model
• Braver et al. (1997) – has demonstrated a positive correlation between an increasing cognitive load processed by the central executive (as marked by increasing task difficulty) and increasing levels of activation in the prefrontal cortex. This supports the idea that the central executive has the role of allocating tasks to slave systems and has a limited processing capacity, as reflected by the increased brain activation levels, thus suggesting that the WMM is accurate in its mechanism of the central executive.
80
Explain short-term memory
• STM is described as being acoustically encoded (Baddeley), having a capacity of 7+/- 2 items (Miller) and a duration of 18-30 seconds (Peterson). Maintenance rehearsal occurs when we repeat the new information to ourselves, allowing the information to be kept in the STM. Prolonged maintenance rehearsal allows the information to pass into the LTM, whilst a lack of such rehearsal causes forgetting.
81
Explain long-term memory
• LTM is described as being semantically encoded, having an unlimited capacity and a very long duration (over 46 years, as shown by Bahrick et al). In order to remember information, 'retrieval' must occur, which is when information is transferred back into the STM, and will continue to pass through the maintenance loop afterwards.
82
Explain how the multi-store memory model acknowledges the qualitative differences between STM and LTM
Through representing them as separate stores. For example, STM is encoded acoustically with a small duration , whilst LTM is encoded semantically and has a much longer duration. Therefore, the MSM portrays an accurate view of the differences between the two types of memory, as supported by Baddeley and Miller.
83
Explain interference
• Interference occurs when the recall of one memory blocks the recall of another, causing forgetting or distorted perceptions of these memories. Interference can be retroactive (new memories block the recollection of old memories) or proactive (old memories block the recollection of new memories).
84
What’s is pro-active interference
Proactive interference: Forgetting occurs when older memories, disrupt the recall of newer memories. For example: you have difficulties learning the names of the students in your psychology class instead you keep remembering the names of the students in your maths group last year.
85
What is retro-active interference
Forgetting occurs when newer memories disrupt the recall of older memories already stored. For example: you have difficulties remembering the names of the students in your psychology group last year because you learnt the names of your psychology class this year.
86
Key ideas behind memory in relation to explanation for forgetting
• Memory traces gradually decay over time. • During any delay a memory is subject to the effects of time and interference from other experiences. • Memories seem to be forgotten because we no longer have the appropriate reminders. • You are more likely to forget something you did not pay attention to when it originally happened. • You are more likely to forget or get mixed up with similar pieces of material.
87
Explain Underwood and Postman (1960) experiment for explanations for forgetting
• Aim: to find out if new learning interferes with previous learning. • Procedure: Participants were divided into two groups. Group A were asked to learn a list of paired words i.e. cat, tree, they were then asked to learn a second list of paired words i.e. glass,table etc. Group B were asked to learn the first list of words only. Both groups were asked to recall the first list of word pairs. • Results: Group B recall of the first list was more accurate than the recall of group A. • Conclusion: This suggests that learning items in the second list interfered with participants' ability to recall the list. This is an example of retroactive interference.
88
Evaluate Underwood and Postman (1960) explanations for forgetting
Positives: Controlled lab conditions: The research was conducted in a highly controlled setting allowing the research to establish cause and effect for the explanations for forgetting Supporting research: There is research which shows that if the material is similar interference is more likely to occur. McGeoch & McDonald studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of materials. Participants had to learn 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy. They then learned a new list. There were put into 6 groups who learnt different types of lists. Those who had the most similar material produced the worst recall Therefore this would suggest that interference is strongest when material is similar. Real-world application to advertising: When people are exposed to adverts from competing brands within a short period of time. Danahar et al (2008) found that both recall and recognition of an advertiser's message were impaired when participants were exposed to two advertisements for competing brands within a week. The effect of their advertisement diluted by interference. Negatives: Limited ecological validity: Underwood & Postman used artificial word lists, which may not reflect real-life memory tasks (e.g. remembering faces, places, or meaningful facts). This means interference may be overestimated in controlled lab settings. Individual differences: Some people may be less affected by interference due to better memory strategies or higher cognitive control, which the studies don’t account for. Limited generalisibility: The controlled lab setting and artificial task may not reflect real-life memory processes, so the findings may not be fully generalisable to how forgetting happens in natural settings.
89
Explain a supporting evaluation for the explanations for forgetting
• Most of the evidence supporting this theory comes from laboratory studies i.e. Underwood and Postman. • This is a strength as the extraneous variables can be controlled and these experiments can be replicated so reliability can be tested, for example the memory tests would have been completed in rooms with no distractions, they could also control the word lists and make sure that all groups received the same lists. • This means that the results should be reliable.
90
Explain supporting research for the explanation for forgetting in everyday life
• There is support for the influence of interference in every day life. • Baddeley & Hitch showed this with memories of rugby matches, however long ago the match had been played it was the most recent match which could be recalled. • This is evidence to support the effect of retroactive interference in a real life setting.
91
Explain negative evaluations for experiments on the explanations for forgetting
Underwood and Postman: • Laboratory studies use artificial material (i.e. word lists). • This means they are meaningless to the participants so they do not represent every day situations when we have to remember things which have meaning to us i.e. a shopping list. • This means that it is difficult to generalise the findings to everyday life. Baddeley and Hitch: • There are some methodological problems with research completed in laboratories for interference • Baddeley (1990) states that the tasks given to participants are too close in time to each other and, in real life, these kinds of events are more spaced out so the effect might be different. • This means that we may not be able to generalise the findings to real-life settings.
92
Explain McGeoch and McDonald (1931) experiment
McGeoch & McDonald studied retroactive interference by changing the amount of similarity between two sets of materials. Participants had to learn 10 words until they could remember them with 100% accuracy. They then learned a new list. There were 6 groups who learnt different types of lists. Those who had the most similar material produced the worst recall Therefore this would suggest that interference is strongest when material is similar.
93
Evaluate McGeoch and McDonald’s experiment (1931)
- The artificial stimuli used in these tasks, such as learning lists of random words with no personal meaning to the participants, means that the findings of interference studies are likely to have low mundane realism. This is because in real life, we are likely to learn lists of meaningful information, such as revision topics for psychology, which we draw links upon and also which have personal meaning to us. These factors may also influence the extent of forgetting, rather than interference Interference has been consistently demonstrated in several studies, but particularly in lab experiments. This increases the validity of the theory, due to the use of highly-controlled conditions in lab experiments, standardised instructions alongside the removal of the biasing effects of extraneous and confounding variables. A second methodological criticism of interference studies, further suggesting that they lack mundane realism and reliability, is that they are often conducted in very short spaces of time, with participants recalling their words 1 or 2 hours after they have learnt them. This does not reflect the normal passage of time in everyday life, where we often find that several days pass until we need to recall such information e.g. in the case of an exam. Therefore, this suggests that interference is unlikely to be a valid explanation for forgetting from the LTM.
94
Explain Baddeley and Hitch’s experiment
They studied a natural experiment using rugby players from a team who had played a varying number of games throughout a season.Some players had played in every match, while others missed games due to injury or other reasons.The players were asked to recall the names of the teams they had played against earlier in the season.Importantly, the actual amount of time that had passed since each game was less important than the number of games played in between. Players who had played more games in between had worse recall of earlier opponents.This shows that interference from newer memories (newer games) made it harder to recall older ones—retroactive interference.It suggests that interference, not just passage of time, is a major factor in forgetting.
95
What is retrieval failure
Retrieval failure suggests that forgetting occurs when the 'cues' (triggers of information recollection) present at the time of encoding the information are not present at the time of recall. This describes Tulving's 'encoding specificity principle' (ESP- Tulving = “the greater the similarity between the encoding event and the retrieval event, the greater the likelihood of recalling the original memory.”
96
Explain the types of cue dependent forgetting
• Bearing in mind that these cues can be associated with internal or external factors, there are two types of forgetting: context-dependent and state-dependent • Context-dependent forgetting occurs when our external cues at the time of encoding do not match those present at recall. State-dependent forgetting occurs when our internal cues at the time of encoding do not match those present at recall.
97
Explain the aim of Godden and Baddeley experiment (1975)
Aim: To see if people who learn and are tested in the same environment will recall more than those who learn and are tested different environments.
98
Explain the method of Godden and Baddeley experiment (1975)
Method: Participants were deep sea divers. They were divided into four groups. All groups were given the same list of words to learn. > Group 1: learnt underwater and recalled underwater • Group 2: Learnt underwater and recalled on shore > Group 3: Learnt on shore and recalled on shore > Group 4: Learnt on shore and recalled underwater
99
Explain the results of Godden and Baddeley experiment (1975)
Results: Groups 1 and 3 recalled 40% more words than groups 2 and 4.
100
Explain the conclusion of Godden and Baddeley experiment (1975)
Recall of information will be better if it happens in the same context that learning takes place.
101
Explain Carter and Cassiday’s experiment (1998)
Aim: to investigate state dependent forgetting Procedure: Gave anti-histamine drugs to their participants. The anti-histamine has a mild sedative effect. This creates an internal physiological state different from the normal state of being awake and alert. The participants had to learn list of words and passages of prose and then recall the information Groupl: Learn on drug - recall when on it. Group 2: Learn on it - recall when not on it. Group 3: Learn not on drug - recall when on it. Group 4: Learn not on it - recall when not on it. Results: In the conditions where there was a mismatch between internal state at learning and recall, performance on the memory test was significantly worse. Groups 1 & 4 performed best Conclusion: this supports the state-dependent memory theory as when cues were absent then there is more forgetting.
102
Explain supporting evidence for retrieval failure
Eysenck (2010) : Argues that retrieval failure is the most likely cause of forgetting in long-term memory (LTM). -This highlights how powerful the theory is suggesting that in many cases, the memories are still stored but cannot be accessed without appropriate retrieval cues (like context or internal state). High Validity from Lab Experiments: • Much of the research (Godden & Baddeley, Carter & Cassaday) is done in well-controlled lab settings. • This means extraneous variables are minimized, increasing internal validity. • The cause-and-effect relationship between cues and recall can be more confidently established. Retrieval failure is also supported by real-world evidence” - For example, when you walk into a room and forget why, then remember once you return to the original location — this supports the role of context-dependent cues.
103
Explain the argument which questions the context effects on retrieval failure
• Baddeley (1997) argued that context effects are not very strong, especially in real life. • He stated that the context need to be very different for any effect to be seen. • This is a limitation because it means that the real-life applications of retrieval failure due to context cues does not actually explain much forgetting.
104
Evaluate Godden and Baddeley (1980) repeated retrieval failure experiment
Strengths (Evaluation Points): Challenges overgeneralisation of retrieval failure: It shows that retrieval cues don't always cause forgetting ,especially not for recognition tasks - making the explanation more nuanced and realistic showing that context dependent forgetting affect recall but not recognition. Improves understanding of when retrieval failure occurs: By comparing recall and recognition, the study helped clarify when retrieval failure is most likely.Cues matter more for recall, where you have to actively retrieve information without help.This deepens our understanding of how memory works in different types of tasks. Carefully controlled design: The 1980 study, like the 1975 one, used controlled environments (on land and underwater), improving internal validity. Limitations: Still artificial in nature: Learning word lists underwater isn't representative of everyday memory use, which limits ecological validity. Limited to one type of cue (context): The study only looks at external context cues. It doesn't tell us about other retrieval cues, like state (e.g., mood, drug effects).
105
Evaluate the encoding specificity principle
Strengths: Supported by research e.g Godden amd Baddeley adn Carter and Cassaday. Both Studies showed better recall when the context/state was similar to when it was encoded and recalled. Limitations: • It is not testable! • In experiments where the cue produces the successful recall of a word, we assume that the cue must have been encoded at the time of learning.If not, we assume it hasn’t been encoded (assumption)The encoding specificity principle suffers from cyclical reasoning due to its over-reliance on assumptions. Other explanations for forgetting: Interference or decay may be better for explaining forgetting in some situations
106
What’s is eyewitness testimony
• Eyewitness testimony refers to the information recalled about a crime by an eyewitness. The accuracy of such an account can be reduced through the influence of misleading (incorrect) information in the form of leading questions and post-event discussions.
107
Explain Johnson and Scott (1976)- the effects of weapons
Participants were asked to wait outside the lab and 'over heard what they thought was a genuine exchange Condition 1 - Heard an amicable discussion about equipment failure and then a man came out with greasy hands holding a pen. Condition 2 - Heard a hostile exchange and the sound of breaking furniture and then a man came out holding a bloody knife Participants were given 50 photographs and asked to identify the man from each condition People who witnessed the peaceful scene had a better recall and were more accurate in recognising than those who witnessed the hostile condition. Pen = 49% accurate recall, bloody knife = 33% accurate recall. They believed that the anxiety caused by the weapon (blood stained knife narrowed the focus of the participant and took some attention from the man's face.
108
Explain the weapon-focus effect
• An explanation for the weapon-focus effect is that the weapon narrows the field of attention and thus reduced information to be stored This is where in violent crimes, arousal may focus the witness on more central details of the attack (for example: weapon) than the more peripheral details (for example: what else was going on and what the perpetrator looked like).
109
Explain how the effects on leading question on EWT was investigated by Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Participants watched a film clip of a car crash and then gave speed estimates of the cars based on the leading question of "About how fast were the cars going when they x into each other?" ", with each group being exposed to a different critical verb. Those exposed to the verb "smashed" gave a speed estimate 8.7 mph greater than those who'd heard "contacted". Therefore, this shows that leading questions, because of the way they are phrased, suggest that there is a correct answer.
110
How can the effects of leading question on EWT be explained in Loftus and Palmer (1974)
The effects of leading questions can be explained using the idea of response bias (leading question influences our asnwer) whereas Loftus and Palmer's study supports the substitution explanation (i.e.leading questions change the eyewitness' memory of the crime), with each group being exposed to a different critical verb. Those exposed to the verb "smashed" gave a speed estimate 8.7 mph greater than those who'd heard "contacted".
111
Explain Gabbert et al. (2003) – post event discussion
Aim: To investigate how post-event discussion between co-witnesses can affect the accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Method: - Participants were put into pairs using a matched-pairs design. - Each member of the pair watched a video of the same crime, but from different angles, meaning each person saw things the other could not (e.g. one might see a thief take money, the other might not). - After watching, participants either: - Discussed what they had seen (post-event discussion group), or - Did not discuss and completed the recall task individually (control group). - Then, all participants completed a test of recall individually. Findings: - 71% of participants in the post-event discussion group mistakenly recalled details they had not seen themselves, but which were mentioned by their partner. - In contrast, the control group (no discussion) had 0% false information recalled. Explanation: This demonstrates the concept of memory conformity: - People may change their memory or report false details because they trust others’ accounts more than their own — especially if they feel uncertain. - Post-event discussions can be influenced by misleading details, media coverage, or assumptions of a crime - This shows that eyewitness memory is not always reliable and can be easily distorted by social interactions.
112
Explain the criticisms for studies of EWT
Lack of ecological validity: The artificial tasks and stimuli of Loftus and Palmer Gabbert EWT al reduces the ecological validity of the findings and the mundane realism of the methodology. For example, the film clips of the car crashes do not expose participants to the anxiety of experiencing a real-life car crash. This anxiety may either have a negative (Johnson and Scott) or positive (Yuille and Cutshall) effect on the accuracy of EWT, thus biasing the findings. Participant variables: It is difficult to estimate speed. However, some groups can find it easier than others (taxi drivers/ police officers). The driver of the car isn’t mentioned , however if it was i could affect results. The type of car may have affected results. Lack of Emotional Realism: • In real crimes, witnesses are often highly anxious or fearful - lab studies can't ethically replicate that level of emotional arousal. • The Yerkes-Dodson Law suggests moderate anxiety improves performance, but high anxiety can impair it — lab settings often fail to test this accurately. !Johnson & Scott's weapon focus study may not fully capture real fear or threat levels, and critics argue it may measure surprise, not anxiety. Demand characteristic: Participants may have guessed the aims of the study and changed their answer leading to response bias. In Loftus and Palmer participants may change their answer due to the use of the verb in order to please/displease the experimenter not as their memory changed.
113
What is misleading information
Incorrect information given to the EW usually after the event
114
What are leading question
A question that suggests a certain answer.
115
What are post-event discussions
Occurs when there is more than one witness to an event. Witnesses may discuss what they have seen with other co-witnesses. This affects accuracy.
116
Key ideas behind the role of schemas in memory
• An important explanation of organisation in human memory relies on the concept of schemas. • These are simplified, generalised representations of things based on our experience. • Memory capacity limitations prevent us from remembering precise details about our everyday lives, but schemas allow us to overcome these limitations because we can summarise the regularities in our lives. • There is a cost to this, however, in that we may mistakenly 'recall' events that never really happened, because they make sense within a particular schema.
117
Evaluate the usefulness of Loftus and Palmer (1974) experiment
Strengths : • This study has many applications: - Police questioning witnesses - Teachers asking/setting questions Controlled lab study: - Conducted in highly controlled conditions, allowing researchers to isolate the effect of the leading question. - Increases internal validity and makes the cause-and-effect relationship more clear. Weaknesses: Low ecological validity: The video of a car crash isn’t emotionally arousing like a real accident would be.. In real life, EWT often involves stress, shock, and trauma, which can affect memory differently.So the findings may not generalise well to real-world crimes. Demand characteristics / response bias: Participants might have guessed the study’s aim and altered their answers based on what they thought was expected.This challenges whether their memory was truly altered, or if they were just influenced in how they responded. Only tested university students: -The sample may not be representative of the general population.Students are often more educated and used to test conditions, which may affect how they respond compared to other age groups or witnesses. e
118
Explain anxiety in relation to the EWT
Anxiety is a physiological response to external pressures, characterised by an increased heart rate, vasoconstriction of blood vessels, increased sweat production etc. Anxiety can have either a positive or negative effect on the accuracy of EWT.
119
Explain Yuille and Cutshall (1986) on the factors affecting the accuracy of eye witness testimony: anxiety
• The positive effect of anxiety on the accuracy of EWT was demonstrated by Yuille and Cutshall (1986), who followed up 13 eyewitnesses, 5 months after a real-life shooting at a shop in Canada. The researchers found that eyewitness accuracy was still high after this period, with an 11% higher accuracy of recall for those eyewitnesses who ranked their anxiety as 'high' (compared to 'low') at the time of the shooting and using a 7-point anxiety scale. There were, however, small discrepancies over estimates of height, weight and clothing. This supports the idea that heightened anxiety draws our attention to external cues through the 'fight or flight' response, where such attention may have given us an evolutionary advantage by increasing our chances of escaping and survival.
120
What’s does the Yerkes and Dodson (1908)- emotional arousal and performance ‘the Yerkes-Dodson law’ suggest
The Yerkes-Dodson Law suggests that there is an 'inverted-U' relationship between increasing arousal and increasing performance (in this case the accuracy of EWT), with moderate arousal yielding the highest levels of performance. If it is too high than accuracy of recall may fall However, this can be considered as an overly-simplified explanation of anxiety because it does not take into account the multiple factors which make up arousal i.e. cognitive, behavioural, emotional etc.f
121
Evaluate the ethical issues of Johnson and Scott and Yuille and Cutshall
There are significant ethical issues associated with exposing participants to distressing situations (Johnson and Scott) and forcing them to recall traumatic crimes which have occurred in the past (Yuille and Cutshall). This breaches the BPS guideline of the right of the participant to be protected from psychological harm, thus meaning that a cost-benefit analysis would be needed to compare the associated ethical costs with the benefits of increased knowledge of the effects of anxiety on the accuracy of EWT.
122
Evaluate biasing of extraneous variables which have not been controlled for Yuille and Cutshall
Real-life studies, particularly with the use of field studies, are particularly susceptible to the biasing effects of extraneous variables which have not been controlled. For example, Yuille and Cutshall could not have controlled the influence of post-event discussions, which has been suggested to reduce the accuracy of EWT, as demonstrated by Gabbert et al. This, alongside media influences in the form of TV report, and the effects of individual schemas, means that field studies of EWT may be flawed in that they lack reliability.
123
What is the cognitive interview
• The cognitive interview is a method of interviewing eyewitnesses, which is thought to be particularly effective in increasing the rates of accurate recall.
124
Explain cognitive interview (Fisher and Geiselman 1992)
Fisher and Geiselman (1992) Reviewed memory literature – people remember things better if they are provided with retrieval cues. The technique they devised had 4 components: 1. Report everything = Even seemingly insignificant details may be important or trigger the recall of larger events, by acting as a 'cue' (think back to retrieval failure!). • 2. Reinstate the context = Recalling the weather, location and mood of the day prevents context-dependent forgetting by reminding the eyewitness of their external cues at the time. • 3. Change the perspective = Recalling events from the perspective of the victim or persecutor prevents the eyewitness' account from being affected by their own schemas or pre-conceived perceptions of how the crime, in their opinion, happened. • 4. Reverse the order = Recalling events in a different order, other than chronological, reduces the ability of the eyewitness to lie (as it is simply difficult) and also reduces the impact of schemas on their perception of events.
125
Explain the Enhanced Cognitive Interview- Fisher et al. (1987)
• An amended version of the Cl that seeks to build a trusting relationship between interviewer and witness and improve the quality of the communication between the two. • The interviewer not distracting the witness with unnecessary interruptions/questions. • The witness controlling the flow of information. • Asking open ended questions • Getting the witness to speak slowly. • Participants being reminded not to guess and to use the 'don't know' option when necessary. • Reducing anxiety in witnesses. • Modified versions of both types of interview have been developed, for example, with children.
126
Why is the cognitive interview technique important
• Improving effectiveness of questioning witnesses in police interview • Applied findings from psychological research to this area
127
Explain support for research Enhanced cognitive interview
Real-life field study with actual detectives in Florida. It compared standard police interviews to the ECI.. The ECI produced 47% more useful information than standard interviews.. in conclusion the ECI improves the amount of accurate information without increasing inaccuracies. Although cognitive interviewing produces can result in recall of additional items, there is a bigger increase in the amount of correct information recalled, compared to a standard interview.
128
Explain criticisms against cognitive interview
Kennel and Wagstaff: The cognitive interview may have little practical value, due to being too time-consuming and requiring specialist skills. For example, Kebbel and Wagstaff argued that only a few hours of training, as is possible for many police forces, is insufficient to adequately train interviewers, especially for the enhanced social understanding required for the enhanced cognitive interview. Therefore, this lack of time for training may explain why some forces may be unimpressed with the Cl. Kohnken et al (1999): The Cl does not only increase the recall of correct information by 81%, but also increases the recall of incorrect information by 61%, as suggested by Kohnken et al (1999). This appears counterintuitive when considering that the chief aim of the Cl was to improve the accuracy of recall of correct information and so increase the reliability of eyewitness testimonies as a whole.
129
Explain supporting research for cognitive interview
Mello and Fisher (1996): When Cl and normal interview techniques were tested on both older adults' (72 years) and younger adults' (22 years) memory, Cl was better for both. Therefore, CI is a better technique to use during interviews to recall information. Fisher et al: Real-life field study with actual detectives in Florida. It compared standard police interviews to the ECI.. The ECI produced 47% more useful information than standard interviews.. in conclusion the ECI improves the amount of accurate information without increasing inaccuracies. Kohnken et al (1999): The Cl does not only increase the recall of correct information by 81%, but also increases the recall of incorrect information by 61%, as suggested by Kohnken et al (1999). Despite the additionally recall of incorrect information there is a greateramoutn fo information recalled from CI than standard interview techniques
130
Explain Loftus and Palmer glass experiment
Method: Participants watched a crash, asked either "smash” , “hit” or no question (control). A week later, they were asked "Did you see any broken glass?" Results: "Smashed" group was more likely to falsely remember seeing glass - even though there was none. Conclusion:Leading questions can alter memory and cause false memories.
131
Evaluate Gabbert et al. (2003) – post event discussion
Positive: Practical value: Gabbert’s findings have strong practical value for the justice system. The research shows how post-event discussion can distort eyewitness memory, which has helped shape police procedures, such as keeping witnesses separated.This supports the use of the cognitive interview to reduce the effects of misleading information. This shows the study is ecologically useful and has real-world impact on legal settings. Laboratory experiment: The study used a controlled lab environment, which allowed researchers to control variables like what each participant saw and how they discussed it.This means the study has high internal validity, because we can be more confident that post-event discussion was the cause of memory distortion. Limitations: Alternative explanation: Gabbert’s results could be explained by memory conformity, rather than actual memory distortion. Some participants may not have truly changed their memory, but simply went along with their co-witness to avoid social conflict or because they lacked confidence in their own memory.This limits the internal validity of the conclusion, as it may reflect social influences rather than genuine memory errors. Low ecological validity: Lab experiment using videos of a crime, the task lacks emotional realism. In real-life crimes, witnesses may be under stress, and memory may be influenced by emotions, fear, or other real-world pressures. Therefore, the study has low ecological validity, and the results may not fully apply to real eyewitnesses in actual crimes.
132
Explain the usefulness of research on EWT
Research into EWT, particularly studies by Loftus and Palmer (on leading questions) and Gabbert et al. (on post-event discussion), has been highly useful in improving the accuracy and reliability of eyewitness accounts in real-world settings: Practical application: changes in how to conduct interviews (avoid leading questions (cognitive interview/ enhanced cognitive interview) Handle witnesses separately to prevent post-event discussion use of cognitive interview- a technique developed to improve memory recall without introcding misleading inflation Research in EWT influenced the UK government which found that misleading information has contributed to wrongful conviction. Therefore, courts have become more cautious of single EWT
133
Question:A researcher investigating the multi-store model of memory tested short-term memory by reading out loud sequences of numbers that participants then had to repeat aloud immediately after presentation. The first sequence was made up of three numbers: for example, 8, 5, 2. Each participant was tested several times, and each time the length of the sequence was increased by adding another number. 1) After the study was completed, the researcher decided to modify the study by using sequences of letters rather than numbers. Suggest one 4-letter sequence and one 5-letter sequence that the researcher could use. In the case of each sequence, give a justification for your choice. Use a different justification for each sequence.(4 marks)
4-letter sequence: K, T, V, L Justification: This sequence doesn’t form a real word, acronym, or abbreviation and has no repeated letters. This increases cognitive demand as participants can’t group or chunk the letters together, so it tests true STM capacity. 5-letter sequence: M, Q, Z, H, R Justification: This sequence also avoids making a word or recognisable abbreviation and contains no repeated or rhyming letters. Without meaning or patterns, it’s harder to remember, making it a valid test of STM limits.
134
Define dual task
Dual-task performance refers to a research method used in cognitive psychology where a person is asked to perform two tasks at the same time, to test the capacity and independence of different components of memory
135
Explain what/when was Tulving’s memory task experiment
Tulving - Investigating different LTM stores (1985)
136
Explain the method behind Tulving (1985)- Investigating different LTM stores
Using PET and fMRl to scan their brains, participants were asked to complete memory tasks.
137
Explain the results behind Tulving (1985)- Investigating different LTM stores
Results showed that both episodic and semantic memories are recalled from the same brain region- the prefrontal cortex, but differ in terms of hemisphere; semantic memories are left and episodic memories are right.
138
Explain them conclusion behind Tulving (1985)- Investigating different LTM stores
This research has been further supported and indicates that long term memories are stored and recalled in different brain regions and different hemispheres.
139
Evaluate Tulving (1985)- Investigating different LTM stores
Positives: Scientific Method – Objective and Reliable Tulving used neuroimaging techniques (e.g. PET scans) to show that episodic and semantic memories are stored in different areas of the brain. This gives the study high internal validity and objective, scientific evidence for different LTM stores. Highly Controlled and Replicable: As a lab-based study, Tulving’s research was tightly controlled, which means standardised procedures and controlled variables. This increases reliability because the study can be replicated to test for consistency across participants and settings. Supports Theory Construction and Hypothesis Testing: Tulving’s findings support the idea that LTM is not a unitary store. His work allowed researchers to build on the multi-store model, proposing that semantic and episodic memory are separate subsystems. This is useful in developing more accurate models of memory, like the LTM model and working memory model. Limitations: Tulving theory is too simple: Tulving’s theory focused mainly on the division between semantic and episodic memory.However, research since then (e.g. Cohen and Squire, 1980) suggests that these may not be completely separate systems — they could be part of a larger declarative memory system. Additionally, Tulving’s work neglects other important types of LTM, such as: Procedural memory/. Therefore: His theory may be too simplistic and doesn’t fully explain the complexity of long-term memory, which limits its theoretical completeness.