Explain what/when was Sperling’s investigation
An investigation of the sensory register
1960
Explain the method behind Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register
In a laboratory experiment, participants were shown a grid with three rows of four letters for 50 milliseconds.
They then had to immediately recall either the whole grid, or a randomly chosen row indicated by a tone (high, medium or low) played straight after the grid was shown.
Explain the results behind Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register
When participants had to recall the whole grid, they only managed to recall four or five letters on average. When a particular row was indicated, participants could recall an average of three items, no matter which row had been selected.
Explain the conclusion behind Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register
The participants did not know which row was going to be selected, so it could be concluded that they would have been able to recall three items from any row, therefore almost the whole grid was held in their sensory register. They could not report the whole grid because the trace faded before they could finish recall.
Evaluate Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register
• Because this was a laboratory experiment, it was highly scientific.
• The variables could be controlled, and it would be easy for someone to replicate the study.
• However, the artificial setting of the study means that it lacks ecological validity- people do not normally have to recall letters in response to a sound, so the result might not represent what would happen in the real world.
What does Sperling (1960) An investigation of the sensory register suggest
Theoretically participants should have been able
to remember 4 items from a row, however approximately only 3 were remembered.
This suggests that sensory memory cannot hold
information for long.
Information decays rapidly in the sensory store!
This supports the existence of a sensory store!
Explain Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) experiment
Showed participants a list of 20 words, presented one at a time and then asked them to recall.
This is called the serial positioning effect. “When asking poeple to remember a list of words which is greater than the capacity of short term memory they have a tendency to remember word from the beginning and end of the list”.
It is compromised of the primay effect. “The tendency for people to remember the first 5 or so words from the beginnning of the list.”
And the recency effect. “The tendency fo people to remember the last 5 or so words from the end of the list.”
Draw the diagram of Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) Multi-store model of memory
Explain how Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) supports the multi-store memory model
The primacy effect occurs because the first words are best rehearsed and transferred to LTM.
The recency effect occurs because these are the last words to be presented. Therefore they are fresh and in STM at the start of recall.Therefore this supports the STM Store and the importance of rehearsal!
Explain STM in relation to the Multi-store memory model
• Information here will disappear (decay) if it is not rehearsed.
• Information will also disappear if new information enters STM and pushes out the original information due to STM’s limited capacity. This is called displacement.
Explain LTM in relation to the multi-store memory model
• Information is moved from STM to LTM via rehearsal.
• Initially rehearsal just maintains the information in STM but the more something is rehearsed the lasting the memory will be.
• This is called ‘maintenance rehearsal’ which is verbal.
• Remember: LTM has an unlimited capacity.
Explain sensory register
Sensory register:
• A stimulus from the environment
• Several stores- one for each of our senses. Since it receives information for our senses it has a huge capacity, but a duration less than half a second. Therefore, information will only pass from the sensory register to the short-term memory store If we pay attention to it
• Iconic - visual information is coded visually
• Echoic-sounds or auditory information is coded acoustically.
Explain how the primacy effect study supports the multi-store memory model
Explain how the recency study supports the multi-store memory model
Explain how a study on people with Korsakoff’s syndrome supports the multi-store memory model
Explain shallice and Warrington (1970) in relation to the multi-store memory model
Studied a patient known as KF who had amnesia. They found that KF’s short term memory for digits was very small when they were reading out loud to him. But recall was much better when he could read them to himself.
KF had poor STM recall for auditory stimuli, but increasingly accurate recall for visual stimuli. This, alongside KF being able to differentiate and recall both verbal and non-verbal sounds but struggle recalling with recalling auditory stimuli suggests that there may be multiple types of STM. This suggests that that the MSM incorrectly presents STM as a single, unitary store
Explain Craik and Watkins (1973) in relation to the multi-store memory model
Amount of rehearsal is important!
• However, Craik and Watkins (1973) found that this is wrong!
• Type is what really matters
They suggest that elaborative rehearsal, instead of prolonged rehearsal, is needed to transfer information from the STM into the LTM, by making links with existing knowledge. This goes against the multi-store memory model. The idea that memory will be maintained if rehearsed.
Explain artificial material in relation to the multi-store memory model
Explain how we know there is more than one type of LTM
There is a lot of research to suggest that similarly to STM, it is not a unitary store. We have different LTM stores for facts and memories of events. This also does not represent that some types of LTM can be retrieved unconsciously (e.g. procedural) whilst others must be retrieved consciously (e.g. semantic), which is not reflected in the universal process of information being consciously transferred to the STM during the process of retrieval.
The case of Clive Wearing supports that there are different types of LTM. Following a brain infection, Wearing’s procedural memory seemed intact (e.g. being able to dress himself and even play the piano), but his episodic memory was severely damaged. When his wife left the room and returned, even after only a few minutes, he would greet her as if they had not seen each other for years. He kept a diary in which he constantly wrote that he was just regaining consciousness every few minutes. This supports that there are different stores for different types of LTM.
Brain scanning studies show that different areas of the brain are active when performing tasks involving different types of LTM. This supports that types of LTM are physically different.
What is duration of memory
How long (in time) a memory lasts before it is no longer accessible.
Key ideas of duration of memory in the STM and LTM
Short term memories:
last for a very short period of time, unless they are rehearsed or paid attention to. Therefore STM is limited in duration. You can think of STM like a notepad where we scribble down things we need to remember for a short while.
Unfortunately the note pad can’t hold very much information and the ink fades away.
Long term memories:
can last anywhere from 2 minutes to 100 years. LTM has an unlimited duration.
Explain what/ when was Peterson and Peterson’s study
Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM
1959
Explain the method behind Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM
Participants were shown nonsense trigrams (3 random consonants, e.g. CVM) and asked to recall them after either 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds.
During the pause, they were asked to count backwards in threes from a given number. This was an ‘interference task’ to prevent them from repeating the letters internally.
Explain the results behind Peterson and Peterson- the duration of STM
After 3 seconds, participants could recall about 80% of trigrams correctly.
After 18 seconds, only 10% were recalled correctly