Meta Ethics Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

Ethical Naturalism

A

Moral properties = natural properties. Meaning features/aspects of the physical world. Makes naturalism a form of moral realism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Example of Ethical Naturalism

A

Bentham’s utilitarianism form an ethical naturalism, claims that goodness is pleasure and that pleasure is a natural property we seek

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hume’s is/ought gap

A

Benthams argument for naturalism is that human nature is to find pleasure - we cannot help but link pleasure to goodness
Infers our ethical judgements is from our feelings - we move too easily from factual statements - is to ought. We cannot empirically detect the vice/wrongness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mill about naturalism

A

MILL argues that happiness is the ultimate desire, goodness - what is good for us might not be good. Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Naturalism on good/bad

A

See these as empirical facts. Ie - Natural law: Aquinas views the world as having a God-given order: good observed via purpose/telos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mill FOR naturalism

A

We are able to know what is good or desirable - things that people actually desire
Significant agreement in values throughout cross-cultural regions: reduce morality to a matter of opinion wrong
ie. comparing holocaust to food preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Naturalistic fallacy

A

If something is natural must be good ie. canines to eat meat does not make vegetarians morally wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

G.E Moore against Ethical naturalism

A

Criticism of Mill’s naturalism in open question argument - pleasure cannot be the same thing as goodness - still possible to ask if goodness is truly good - naturalism makes assumptions ie. Aquinas on telos/purpose: existentialists reject assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Foot on ought/is

A

No problem in deriving ought from is - ought functions like need ie plant.
Aristotellian moral precepts: fluorishing natural property of organisms ie. plant needing sun to fluorish
FOOT illustrated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MacIntyre on Ethical Naturalism

A

Modern societies focus on abstract law improved without foundation / apparent connection to the facts of communal human practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nozick’s thought experiment

A

Demonstrates the dangers of basing moral judgements on natural properties
By demonstrating that people prefer a less-than-perfect real life over a perfect simulated one, Nozick implies that “the good” cannot be reduced to a purely naturalistic, internal state of pleasure.
If happiness is just pleasure, then the machine should be the ultimate goal.
If we refuse it, then “the good” includes external factors like authenticity, agency, and truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intuitionist

A

Good/bad are non-natural properties: not natural, but real in some sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Analogy of the colour yellow

A

Yellow doesn’t have any distinguishable properties: just intuitively know it. Same w/ good/bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is intuitionalism cognitivist?

A

Yes, we can gain knowledge on ethical propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

G.E Moore open argument

A

Goodness is an open question, cannot be defined by itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intuitionalism vs moral disagreement

A

Evidence FOR intuitionism = cross-cultural moral agreements in a core set of moral codes: all culture have rules about killing/stealing - we share intuition of right/wrong
Understanding of the word good = explain moral disagreements

16
Q

Mackie against intuitionalism

A

Points out descriptive moral relativism - there is also mass cross-cultural moral disagreements. Doesnt prove meta ethical relativism - no non-natural: doesn’t provide absolutist argument against this

17
Q

Defence of intuitionism against Mackie

A

Inconsistency in moral reasoning a product of the social climate, strengthen that adding moral agreements abd evolutionary drives

18
Q

Freud against intuitionalism

A

Moral agreements a result of social conditioning - basic constructions to be in relation to society ie no stealing/killing
Isn’t intuition, but developed on by countless years of progression and trial and error

19
Q

Intuitionism on the fact-value challenge

A

moral values separate from empirical world - unlike empiricism, able to establish moral facts that ensure right and wrong

20
Q

Evolution against intuitionism

A

Evolutionary explanations of morility ie Darwins or psychological evaluations like Freuds idea on social conditioning better to account on morality - certain things are right/wrong

21
Q

WD Ross FOR intuitionism

A

Know intuitionally when to help others - prima facie dtuies

22
Q

Prichard FOR intuitionism

A

Morality is like common sense

23
Q

Kahneman AGAINST intuitionsim

A

Intuitions like are driven by fear - emotions are machines for jumping for conclusions

24
Cognitivism
We can have moral knowledge, ethical statements about facts that can be proved true and false - moral values derived from sense experience
25
Non-Cognitivism
When someone makes a moral statement they arent describing the world but expressing their emotions and opinions: moral statements aren't descriptive and have subjective moral properties
26
Emotivism
Ayer broadly agrees w Hume/Moore - naturalistic fallacy disconnects values from natural properties we observe - nonetheless, reject Moore's idea of non-natural property - unverifiable Ethical language is not analytical - denied w/o contradiction: ethical language is just expressions of emotions and meaningless
27
Ayer verification principle
States that a statement is only meaningful if it is either analytical or empirically verifiable
28
Premise of emotivism
p1. only desires are motivating, not belifs p2. ethical language involves motivation c1. so, ethical language expresses non-cognitive desires
29
Stevenson on emotivism
Words have descriptive and dynamic meaning - loaded down w/ work = descriptive, but also dynamic as you hope someone will help you with the workload - similarly, 'abortion is wrong': Good have both a descriptive and dynamic set of standard meaning
30
Criticism against verification principle
tautology, it in itself cannot be verified: BUT... Ayer base emotivisn on other argument ie. Hume's motivation argument
31
Hume's motivation argument
Hume’s motivation argument posits that moral judgments inherently motivate action, whereas reason alone is "impotent" and cannot produce action or desire. Because moral judgments (sentiments) drive behavior, while reason merely informs us of facts, Hume concludes that morality is not derived from reason, but from sentiments of approval or disapproval, forming a foundation for emotivism.
32
33