given behaviors
purposive and intentional; under control of the actor
given off behaviors
not purposive OR intentional, not under control of the sender
4 aspects of meaning in nonverbal behavior
intention (encoding)
what are people’s intentions when they emit this behavior?
perception/interpretation (decoding)
how do receivers of this behavior interpret it?
interactive
are there behaviors that have a reliable behavioral effect on others? (ex: invasion of space)
shared encoding-decoding
are there behaviors whose meaning senders and receivers consistently agree on?
usage
circumstances in which the behavior happens (ex: external behaviors, public vs. private)
-does the behavior draw external feedback?
4 types of information conveyed (part of usage)
1 idiosyncratic
idiosyncratic
usage and meaning is peculiar to individual
informative
shared encoding and decoding
communicative
enacted with a clear, conscious intention to convey a message
interactive
influence or modify another persons behavior
origins- three things where nonverbal behaviors come from?
coding and three types
-relationship between behavior and what it stands for 3 types: -arbitrary -iconic (metaphoric) -intrinsic
arbitrary
no intrinsic meaning in behavior, meaning happens by convention (ex: peace sign)
iconic (metaphoric)
(v for victory) preserve some aspects of the referent, do not need verbal to be understood (call me, gun)
intrinsic
the act IS a case of the thing that is signifying (aggression)
symbolic/arbitrary example
flipping off
Five categories of nonverbal behavior (Ekman and Friesen)
emblems
nonverbal behavior that function like words, can replace language. (ex: waving, hi, bye). Most cultural specific, learned by convention
illustrators
adds visual dimension to verbal part
adaptors
largely unconscious, behavior we emit to manage or regulate our arousal (when it’s too high or too low) (ex: twirling keys (object), touching hair (self), rarely aware
regulators
traffic code example, stop sign, light.