What is the role of forensic psychologists?
What training do forensic psychologists need?
○ Requirements include having an advanced degree, supervised clinical work and a licensing exam
○ Enforcement of codes of conduct
What is Haney’s taxonomy?
Psychology IN law
Psychology OF law
Psychology AND law
What is psychology IN law?
○ Explicit and conventional use of psychology by lawyers in the legal process
○ Most common role of psychologists, though role is often passive
Examples: psychological testimony on legal issues (e.g., insanity defense or competency to stand trial)
What is psychology OF law?
○ Psychologists study issues such as why people need and obey the law
○ Role of psychologist autonomous
○ Two categories of examination:
§ Origins/existence of law and the psychological function it serves
§ How laws operate as a determinant of behaviour
What is the role of an expert witness?
§ Aid in understanding a particular issue (testify regarding research, theory, or mental health)
§ The only type of witness who can offer opinions
§ Contrasts with regular witnesses who can only testify about what they have directly observed
What are the 4 sources of law?
Charter of rights and freedoms
Legislation
Common-law
Administrative tribunals
What is stare decisis?
like cases must be decided alike
What are the 4 levels of court?
Supreme Court of Canada
Provincial court of appeal
Provincial superior court
provincial courts
what is actus reus?
the act that constitutes a criminal act, “guilty act”
what is mens rea?
the mental state of the perpetrator at the time of the offence, “guilty mind”
What are summary offenses?
what are indictable offences?
What are the 2 types of defences?
FRYE V. UNITED STATES (passed polygraph test)
• Resulted in general acceptance test:
○ In order for novel scientific evidence to be admissible, it must be established that the procedures used to arrive at the testimony are generally accepted in the scientific community
○ Compare probative value against prejudicial consequences
§ Probative - proves a particular point or is useful in deciding an issue
§ Prejudicial - potential bias evidence or testimony could case
DAUBERT V. MERREL DOW (birth defect)
• Testimony is admissible if it is: 1. Provided by a qualified expert 2. Relevant 3. Reliable as determined by Daubert criteria • The criteria requires the research: ○ Be peer reviewed ○ Be testable (falsifiable through experimentation) ○ Have a known error rate ○ Adhere to professional standards
R V. MOHAN (Dr teens)
• Judges use Mohan Criteria to determine whether expert witness is necessary
○ Testimony is necessary to the case
○ Opinion must be relevant to the case
○ Expert witness has appropriate qualifications
○ Information doesn’t violate rules of execution
What are the 3 types of plea bargains?
○ Charge bargaining - involves promises concerning the nature of the charges to be laid
○ Sentence bargaining - involves promises relating to the ultimate sentence
○ Fact bargaining - involves promises concerning the facts that the Crown may bring to the attention of the trial judge
What is the competency doctrine?
○ Allows postponement of proceedings
§ Accused has right to assist counsel, confront accusers and testify on own behalf
§ Unfair to try defendant if unable to participate
§ Protects dignity and integrity of court proceedings
What is the difference between fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility?
• Fitness to Stand trial
○ Pertains to the mental state of the accused at the time of trial or at some specific point in the proceedings
○ Can be raised by defence, prosecution, or court
• Criminal Responsibility
○ Insanity defence in Canada is now referred to as Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD)
○ A defence that pertains to the accused’s mental state at the time of the offence
What does it mean to be “unfit to stand trial”?
• “unfit to stand trial” means unable on account of mental disorder to conduct a defence at any stage of the proceedings before a verdict is rendered or to instruct counsel to do so, and, in particular, unable on account of mental disorder to
A. Understand the nature or object of the proceedings
B. Understand the possible consequences of the proceedings or
C. Communicate with counsel
R V. PRITCHARD (marijuana deaf)
• Three issues identified
○ Whether the defendant is mute of malice
○ Whether the defendant can plead to the indictment
○ Whether the defendant has sufficient cognitive capacity to understand proceedings
R V. TAYLOR (blood test w/o lawyer)
What does an assessment of fitness include?
○ Interview
○ Forensic assessment instruments
○ Third-party information