MidTerms Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

What are the elements of piracy under PD 532?

A

1) Attack or seizure of a vessel or its cargo 2) In Philippine waters 3) By any person (including passengers or crew) 4) With intent to gain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Is piracy under PD 532 limited to strangers to the vessel?

A

No. Even passengers or crew members may commit piracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What qualifies piracy under PD 532?

A

When accompanied by murder, homicide, physical injuries, or rape.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is intent to gain necessary in piracy under PD 532?

A

Yes. Animus lucrandi is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Doctrine: Piracy is a crime against what?

A

It is a crime against humanity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is piracy a continuing offense?

A

Yes. It continues as long as the illegal detention or control of the vessel persists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Distinguish piracy under RPC and PD 532.

A

RPC piracy applies to high seas; PD 532 applies to Philippine waters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Elements of highway robbery under PD 532

A

1) Robbery on a Philippine highway 2) Violence or intimidation 3) Intent to gain 4) Victims are chosen indiscriminately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Key doctrine: What distinguishes highway robbery from ordinary robbery?

A

Highway robbery is directed against any person indiscriminately, not a specific intended victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is a pre-identified victim consistent with highway robbery?

A

No. If the victim is pre-selected, it is ordinary robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is conspiracy common in highway robbery cases?

A

Yes. Brigandage typically involves more than one offender.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elements of illegal possession of firearm under RA 10591

A

1) Existence of firearm 2) actual or constructive Possession by accused 3) Lack of license or authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who has burden to prove lack of license?

A

The prosecution must prove the negative fact of absence of license.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happens if the firearm is used in homicide or murder?

A

Illegal possession is absorbed; use becomes an aggravating circumstance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is mere possession sufficient for conviction?

A

Yes, if conscious and without license.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Is intent to use required for illegal possession?

A

No. Mere possession without license suffices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Doctrine: Possession must be what kind?

A

Actual or constructive possession with intent to possess.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Law penalizing obstruction of justice

A

PD 1829.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Elements of obstruction of justice

A

1) A crime has been committed 2) Accused performs acts to prevent apprehension, prosecution, or conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Examples of acts under PD 1829

A

Harboring offender; destroying evidence; preventing witnesses from testifying; misleading police.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Is knowledge of the crime required?

A

Yes. The accused must know that a crime has been committed.

22
Q

Can a principal in the crime be liable for obstruction?

A

No. One cannot obstruct justice in his own case.

23
Q

Who may be liable under RA 3019?

A

Public officers and private individuals conspiring with them.

24
Q

Elements of Section 3(e) RA 3019

A

1) Public officer 2) Act done in official capacity 3) Caused undue injury OR gave unwarranted benefits 4) Through manifest partiality, evident bad faith, or gross negligence

25
Define manifest partiality
Clear, notorious, or plain inclination to favor one side.
26
Define evident bad faith
Palpable and intentional dishonest purpose or moral obliquity.
27
Define gross inexcusable negligence
Negligence characterized by want of even slight care.
28
Is proof of undue injury always required?
No. It is sufficient to prove giving of unwarranted benefit.
29
Doctrine: RA 3019 is malum prohibitum or malum in se?
It is malum in se.mens rea is and element of the crims
30
May a private individual be convicted under RA 3019 alone?
Yes, if he conspires with a public officer.
31
What is undue injury?
Actual damage capable of pecuniary estimation.
32
Is actual damage necessary if unwarranted benefit is proven?
No. Either undue injury OR unwarranted benefit suffices.
33
Elements of plunder
1) Public officer 2) Amasses, accumulates, or acquires ill-gotten wealth 3) Through combination or series of overt acts 4) Total value at least ₱50 million
34
Define ill-gotten wealth
Any asset acquired through unlawful means such as kickbacks, misappropriation, commissions, or fraudulent schemes.
35
What is meant by combination in plunder?
At least two different predicate acts.
36
What is meant by series in plunder?
Repetition of the same predicate act.
37
Is conspiracy required in plunder?
Not necessarily. A public officer may commit plunder alone.
38
May private individuals be liable for plunder?
Yes, if they conspire with the public officer.
39
Is plunder a single or multiple crime?
It is a single indivisible crime composed of a series or combination of acts.
40
What is the minimum amount required for plunder?
₱50,000,000.
41
Penalty for plunder
Reclusion perpetua and forfeiture of ill-gotten wealth.
42
Is each overt act separately punishable?
No. They are absorbed into the single crime of plunder.
43
Doctrine: Must each predicate act be proven beyond reasonable doubt?
No. What must be proven is the pattern of criminal conduct resulting in accumulation of at least ₱50M.
44
Distinguish plunder from malversation
Plunder requires ₱50M total and series/combination; malversation does not require threshold amount.
45
Is plunder a continuing offense?
Yes. It involves accumulation over time through multiple acts.
46
Does acquittal in one predicate act bar plunder conviction?
No, as long as total ill-gotten wealth and pattern are proven.
47
What is the gravamen of plunder?
The accumulation of ill-gotten wealth in the aggregate amount of at least ₱50M.
48
Is plunder bailable?
It is non-bailable when evidence of guilt is strong.
49
Can a public officer be convicted of plunder through negligence?
No. There must be intentional amassing of wealth.
50
Is proof of exact breakdown of ₱50M required?
No. What is required is proof beyond reasonable doubt that total ill-gotten wealth reaches at least ₱50M.
51
Doctrine: Plunder is punished as what type of offense?
As a heinous crime with a single penalty regardless of number of acts.