Humes first argument
-no such thing as a miracle
-no evidence for it
-accept that its true if its more illogical to think it is false
Humes second argument
Humes third argument
Humes fourth argument
Criticism against Hume (1st)
Criticism against Hume (2nd)
hume
a miracle is a contradiction of the belief in G-d
deist vs thesit
deist- G-d created the universe but is no longer involved, miracles don’t happen as there are set laws which are untampered with
theist- G-d is involved and miracles exist
Bible
-genesis G-d bought a miraculous flood to punish the people of that generation
-later promised Abraham that his descendants will be G-ds chosen people for all time
-implied that G-d would ensure his descendants safety
resurrection of the dead:
book of kings= Elijah and Elisha bring a child back to life
in Ezekiel, the prophet experiences a vision of the ‘dry bones’ of fallen Jews coming back to life
contradiction of nature:
Moses staff was thrown into the ground and turned into a snake
Korach and his followers are swallowed by the earth
miraculous healing
general Naaman is struck with leprosy, he follows Elisha’s advice and bathes 7 times in the river Jordan and is miraculously resorted to full heath
theist
-miracles happen but they are tools by which G-d rewards the righteous and punishes the wicked
-however isn’t the suggestion of miracles a criticism against G-d?
-the need is a flaw in creation therefore if there is a flaw the world can’t have been made by a perfect G-d
criticism of Hume’s second argument
criticism of Hume’s third and fourth argument
Maurice Wiles
-rejects miracles on a moral ground
-G-d created the world with natural law
-even though He could choose to intervene He won’t because it contradicts the moral structure of the world