Misrepresentation Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

Misrepresentation =

A

When a representation ( statement that induces making of contract) is false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

False statement =

A

Not true, type is defined by how aware they were of this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fletcher v Krell

A

No obligation to make the statment but if made it must be true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

With V O’Flanagan

A

A statment can become misrep if it becomes untrue before the contract is made - must be corrected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dimmcock V Hallet

A

Half truth not accepted, silence will be misrep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tate V Williamson

A

Silence can be misrep if it breaches trust of à contract made in good faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lampert v Co-operatives Insurance Society

A

All material fact must be disclosed or their will be misrep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Spice girls LTD v Aprilla world service

A

Statment need not be written or verbal but may be implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Material fact =

A

Would make a reasonable person enter the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bisset V Wilkinson

A

Statment must be a fact, if an opinion then no misrep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Edignton v Fitzmaurice

A

Statment of future intention is not a fact, can be misrep if those weren’t intentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Made by à party to a contract

A

Won’t be misrep if statment was made by someone who wasn’t their agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Induced ither party into contract =

A

Most be a critical part of the decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Atwood v Small

A

Statment must be important + must have relied on it rather than their own judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Redgrave v Hill

A

Doesn’t matter if they could have discovered truth with reasonable steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Museprime properties v Adhill properties

A

Irrelevant what reasonable person would have done

17
Q

Innocent misrepresentation =

A

Statment maker wasn’t aware of it being untrue and genuinely believed it was

18
Q

Negligent Misrepresentation - Hedley Byrne v Heller

A

False statment made by someone with no reasonable grounds to belive it was true

19
Q

Negligent Misrepresentation - Howard Marine v Agden and Sons

A

Burden of proof falls on statment maker

20
Q

Fraudulent misrepresentation- Derry V Peak

A

Known to be untrue

21
Q

Fraudulent Misrepresentation - Greenridge Luton One v Kempton Investmants LTD

A

Overly Rosetinted POV

22
Q

Remedies - Restitution (party back to orginal state) Exclusion - Clarke V Dickson

A

Return to orginal position is impossible

23
Q

Remedies - Restitution (party back to orginal state) Exclusion - Long V Lloyd

A

Contract affirmed

24
Q

Remedies - Restitution (party back to orginal state) Exclusion - Leaf v International Galleries

A

Delay - complains long after contract made

25
Remedies - Restitution (party back to orginal state) Exclusion - Lewis v Avery
Someone else gained interests over goods
26
Remedies - Damages - Innocent - government of Zanzibar v British aerospace
Damages awarded in place of recession
27
Remedies - Damages - Negligent - Hedley Bryne V Heller
Damages are calculated under the law of tort + contributory negligence
28
Remedies - Damages - Fraudulent -Smith new court V scrimgeour vickers
Damages aim to put victim back in pre-contractual state
29
Remedies - Damages - Fraudulent - East V Maurer
Damages may be awarded for loss of profit