Misrepresentation Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

Define Misrepresentation

A
  • A false statement of fact
  • Made by one party to the contract to the other
  • That induces the other party to enter the contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What counts as a False Statement

A
  • Statement of Law
  • Not a Mere Puff
  • Not a Mere Opinion
  • Statement of Future Intention
  • Silence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some Exceptions when Silence does become Misrepresentation

A
  • Conduct
  • Concealing Defects
  • Half true Statements
  • Change in Circumstances
  • Fiduciary Relationships
  • Contracts unberrimae fidei
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain Statement of Law and Give a case

A
  • A false statement about the law can amount to misrepresentation
  • Pankania v LBC: Buyer was told a lease could be terminated at any time, which was incorrect legally. Held to be a misrep of law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain Not a mere puff

A

Sales talk or exaggerated advertising (“puff”) is not misrepresentation. However, giving a half truth or incomplete truth may be.
- Dimmock v Hallet: Seller described land as “fertile and desirable” (puff), but failed to mention all the tenants were leaving. This was a misleading half-truth = misrep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain Not a Mere Opinion and give a two Case

A

An honest opinion is not misrep.
Bisset v Wilkinson - Seller guessed land could support 2,000 sheep. Buyer sued when it didnt. Court held this was just an opinion.
However, if the person giving the opinion has expert knowledge, may amount to misrep.
Esso v Marden - Esso estimated petrol sales for station. As experts, their opinion was treated as fact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain Statements of Future Intention and give a case

A

Statements about what someone intends to do in the future are generally not misrepresentations, unless the person knowingly lies about their intention.
Edginglington v Fitzmaurice - Company said money would be used for expansion but secretlu used to pay debts. Misrepresentation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain Silence and give a Case

A

The general rule is that silence is not misrepresentation, theres no duty to offer up information unless asked.
Fletcher v Krell - Woman didnt disclose she was divorced when applying to be a governess. No misrep.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Expection to Silence: Conduct. Give a Case.

A

A party’s actions can imply a false statement.
Spice Girls v Aprilia - Band entered sponsorship deal knowing a member was leaving. By participating in promo events, they implied she was staying = misrep by conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Expection to Silence: Concealing Defects. Give a Case.

A

Taking active steps to hide a fault counts as misrepresentation.
Schneider v Heath - Seller deliberately submerged a defective boat to hide the damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Expection to Silence: Half-true Statements. Give a Case.

A

If you give some of the truth but leave out key facts that change the meaning, its misrep.
Dimmock v Hallet - Truthfully said land had tenants, but didnt say they were leaving - this was misleading.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Expection to Silence: Change in Circumstances. Give a Case.

A

If you make a statement which later becomes false before the contract is signed, you must correct it.
With v O’Flanagan - Seller gave income figure for a medical practice, but it dropped significantly before the deal. He didnt update the buyer - misrep.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Expection to Silence: Fiduciary Relationships. Give a Case.

A

Where theres a special relationship of trust (financial advisor and client), theres a duty to disclose relevant info.
Nocton v Lord Ashburton - Solicitor failed to disclose relevant information to a client. Clear fiduciary relationship. Strong authority for duty to disclose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Expection to Silence: Contracts uberrimae fidei. Give a Case.

A

Some contracts require full disclosure of all material facts - especially insurance.
Seaman v Fonnerau - Established duty to disclose material facts in good faith contracts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain Contracts uberrimae fidei in consumer insurance

A

The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 now applies:
- Consumers dont have to volunteer info
- But they must take reasonable care when answering insurer questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Contracts uberrimae fidei in buesiness insurance

A

The Insurance Act 2015 still requires disclosure of all material facts (a “fair presentation”).

16
Q

How are Consumer Contracts regulated in Misrepresentation

A
  • Regulated by the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008
  • Regulation 5 – prohibits misleading actions (false info, deceptive adverts)
  • Regulation 6 – prohibits misleading omissions (leaving out or hiding key info)
17
Q

What are the different types of misrepresentation?

A
  • Innocent Misrepresentation
  • Negligent Misrepresentation
  • Fraudalent Misrepresentation
18
Q

Explain Fraudulent Misrepresentation

A
  • A knowingly false statement, made without belief in its truth or recklessly (not caring whether its true or false).
19
Q

What case shows not fraudalent as they believed they had a right

A

Derry v Peek - Directors claimed they has the right to use steam trams, when permission was still pending. Not fraudalent because they believed it would be granted.

20
Q

What case shows deliberate concealment can amount to fraudalent misrepresentation

A

Ticket2Final OU v Wigan Athletic - Wigan misled the claimant about financial stability to induce the investment. Fraudalent Misrep.

21
Q

What is the Standard of Proof for Fraudalent Misrepresenation

A
  • Claimant must prove fraud on the balance of probabilities, but courts scrutinise (closely analyse) more closely than usual.
22
Q

What is the remedies for Fraudalent Misrep

A
  • Rescission (Contract Cancelled)
  • Damages in tort of deceit: Includes all losses flowing from the misrep
23
Q

Explain Negligent Misrepresentation

A

A false statement made honestly, but without taking reasonable care, within a relationship giving rise to a duty of care

24
What case shows that a bank made careless statements
Hedley Byrne v Heller - A bank's reference caused financial loss. Althought disclaimer prevented liabilty. House of Lords established a party can be liable for carelessly made statements in a special relationship.
25
What are the requirements needed to establish Negligent Misrep and what case confirms this?
NRAM v Steel - The representor reasonably foresaw the other would rely on the statement - It was reasonable for the claimant to rely on it in the circumstances.
26
What is a Remedy for Negligent Misrep
- Damages in tort for reasonably foreseeable losses - Rescission
27
Explain Negligent Misrep - Statutory s.2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967
- False statement made without reasonable grounds for belief, and no need for a special relationship - C proves there was a misrepresentation. The burdent shifts to D to prove that they had reasonable grounds to believe it was true and genuinely believed it was until the contract was formed
28
What case shows that relying on less reasonable documents can amount to Negligent Misrep under statute
Howard Marine v Ogden - D gave ship capacity figures from Lloyds Register which was wrong but the correct capacity was written in the ships own documents. Not reasonable to rely on Lloyds Register. Liable.
29
What are the remedies for Statutory Negligent Misrepresentation
- Rescission - Damages: all direct losses recoverable
30
Explain Innocent Misrepresentation
A false statement made genuiely and reasonably, with belief in its truth Statute: Misrepresentation Act 1967, s.2(2)
31
What case shows that he wouldnt of purchased a car if he knew the truth.
Salt v Stratstone Ltd - The seller described the car as "brand new" when it was two years old, had been in an accident and already been registered. Innocent Misrep as D honestly believed the car was brand new.
32
What is the Remedy for Innocent Misrep
- Rescission - Damages only if rescission is barred or unjust