If a contract is affected by an ‘operative’ mistake, the contract is
void
Void
the contract has no legal effect from the outset
Common mistake
requires the same mistake to have been made by both the parties, usually concerning the existence or identity of the subject matter of the contract
When will common mistake render the contract void?
common mistake as to the existence of the subject matter
When will common mistake NOT render the contract void?
common mistake as to a fact/quality fundamental to the agreement (eg value of an artwork) does not void the contract; will only be void in the most severe instances of mistake
in a scenario where one of the parties is mistaken because he has been careless or reckless (Tamplin v James), rather than because of ambiguity/misrepresentation, who will be at fault?
the party at fault will be bound by the agreement
What is mutual mistake?
mutual mistake occurs when both parties make a fundamental mistake in respect of a contract term, leading to a lack of genuine mutual consent
test for mutual mistake
test of reasonableness: would a reasonable person have taken the agreement to mean what the parties thought it meant?
if the parties are mutually mistaken but are at cross-purposes, the contract may be held
void for mutual mistake
How is mutual mistake assessed?
the courts look at the words and conduct of the parties
If the seller is referring to a red car, while the buyer believes they are negotiating for a blue car, is the contract between the buyer and seller valid?
No, the contract is void due to mutual mistake
unilateral mistake
where only one party is mistaken and the other party knows, or is deemed to know, of the mistake
unilateral mistake renders a contract
void
to rely on unilateral mistake, the mistaken party must provide evidence to satisfy what 3 following conditions?
general rule under L’Estrange v Graucob
a person is bound by the terms of any instrument which they sign or seal even though they did not read it or did not understand its contents
Where a person signs a document or executes a deed under a mistaken belief as to the nature of the document, they may raise the defence of
non est factum (‘it is not my deed’)
A plea of non est factum may be available where the mistake was due to either:
a) the blindness, illiteracy, or senility of the person signing; or
b) a trick or fraudulent misrepresentation as to the nature of the document, provided that person took all reasonable precautions before signing.
If the contract is void for mistake, it is about
identity
If the contract is voidable for misrepresentation, it is about
attributes
When would the court agree to rectify an error in a contract?
if there is clear evidence of prior common intention and a mistake to suggest that the contract did not reflect their common intention