MMT
manual muscle testing - method of assessing strength(not torque) that makes use of muscle or muscle groups ability to move against gravity or manual resistance - rating assigned after test - can utilize to initially test PROM and AROM
Break test
with resistance applied at end range - gradually increase resistance until movement caused by therapist
resistance through the range
sometimes called “make test”(not common) Disadvantages: - reliability is not good - therapist needs to be strong enough - takes a lot of time
MMT grading
5 = normal = 100% 4 = good = 80% 3 = fair = 50% 2 = poor = 20% 1 = trace = 5% 0 = zero = 0% - includes + and - system
factors to determine/rate a muscle grade
1) gravity 2) manual resistance 3) palpation(presence or absence of contraction)
MMT subjectivity
PT’s strength is variable - PT’s experience
screening tests
useful for more generalized involvement - screen upper and lower body in small amount of time - then narrow to specific joints - might be difficult to pick up impairments when using large muscle groups
considerations when performing MMT
1) limited ROM 2) Fatigue 3) Pain 4) Substitution
Limited ROM consideration
Fatigue consideration
pain consideration
substitution consideration
MMT precautions and limitations associated with pt’s with neuromuscular conditions
MMT precautions and limitations associated with pt’s with cardiovascular conditions
contraindications to performing MMT
acute inflammation or pain in the area - swelling or heat - will increase pain
1 RM
max amount of force in 1 repetition - may perform with free weights or cable tensiometers
advantages of 1 RM over MMT
disadvantages of 1 RM to MMT
HHD
hand held dynamometer - microfet = most common
issues to be aware of with HHD’s
reliability with HHD
1) tester = tester strength is an issue 2) device = verify that device is accurate and calibrated 3) test procedures = same position and technique must be used 4) patient = must make sure it is the max value or close
advantages of HHD to MMT
disadvantages of HHD to MMT