Model 7 - Notes Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

How can a claim be tested?

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

– validity

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

– reliability

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

– accuracy of the procedure, including random and systematic error

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

● Sample selection

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

● Sample sizes

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

● Advertising with evidence-based claims

– health claims on food packaging

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

● Advertising with evidence-based claims

– claims about the efficacy of a product

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

● Placebos

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

● Double-blind trials

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

● Control groups

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

● Societal and economic

– predicting variations in climate

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

● Societal and economic

– suggesting remedies for health conditions

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

● Societal and economic

– manipulating statistical data

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

● Correlation can be misinterpreted as causation.

 the Hawthorne effect

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

● Correlation can be misinterpreted as causation.

 1991 study that linked hormone replacement therapy to coronary heart disease

17
Q

● Correlation can be misinterpreted as causation.

 the Mozart Effect on child development

18
Q

● scientific debate and how it is portrayed in the mainstream media

19
Q

● ‘hypothesis’

20
Q

● ‘belief’

21
Q

● ‘law’

22
Q

● compare the difference in reporting between a peer-reviewed journal article and a scientific article published in popular media

23
Q

● conflicts of interest can result in scientific evidence being suppressed, misinterpreted or misrepresented and discuss measures to counteract such conflicts:
– tobacco industry and lung cancer

24
Q

● conflicts of interest can result in scientific evidence being suppressed, misinterpreted or misrepresented and discuss measures to counteract such conflicts:
– fossil fuel industry and climate change

25
● conflicts of interest can result in scientific evidence being suppressed, misinterpreted or misrepresented and discuss measures to counteract such conflicts: – commercial industries researching products for market – asbestos mining and lung cancer
-
26
● conflicts of interest can result in scientific evidence being suppressed, misinterpreted or misrepresented and discuss measures to counteract such conflicts: – asbestos mining and lung cancer
-
27
● describe the halo effect and, using examples, explain how the influence of positive perceptions can result in the rejection of valid alternative perspectives, including but not limited to: – celebrities endorsing products or viewpoints – popular brand companies making misleading advertising claims
-
28
● pseudo-scientific | – astrology
-
29
● pseudo-scientific | – numerology
-
30
● pseudo-scientific | – iridology
-
31
● analyse the scientific debate surrounding ‘publication’ and discuss the implications of scientists’ need to ‘publish or perish’
-
32
● evaluate the increasing volume of scientific papers being published and assess the feasibility of science to effectively manage, review, replicate and validate investigations, for example: – Pons and Fleischmann's cold fusion announcement in 1989
-
33
● evaluate the increasing volume of scientific papers being published and assess the feasibility of science to effectively manage, review, replicate and validate investigations, for example: – Alex Smolyanitsky’s falsified scientific paper using the pseudonyms Maggie Simpson and Edna Krabapple, accepted for publication in 2014
-
34
● evaluate the increasing volume of scientific papers being published and assess the feasibility of science to effectively manage, review, replicate and validate investigations, for example: – Tom Spears’ nonsense journal submission accepted for publication in 2013
-
35
● analyse the benefits of peer review in relation to the advancement of science
-
36
● discuss the impact of fake science journals on the public perception of science
-