why is prehistory different
how is pre history connected to invisibility of women
recent criticisms of archaeological interpretations?
how have feminists responded to these criticisms?
In light of these criticisms, feminist and queer anthropologists have called for gendered and queer approaches to prehistory and archaeology.
when does prehistory refer to? biased intereptations?
concerns about prehistory analysis based on modern view?
many of these analyses have led to androcentric and/or heteronormative interpretations of the past.
* there is a concern that by projecting modern-day views of male and female gender roles (e.g., man as the breadwinner and woman as the homemaker) onto the human prehistoric past, many of our current views of males and females may seem eternal and unchanging (i.e., biologically based and innate).
how can applying a gendered approach affect pre history models?
man the hunter premise? based on what 3 ideas?
criticism of man the hunter premise