Fast track resolution process s 55
55. Fast track corporate insolvency resolution process.—
(2) An application for fast track corporate insolvency resolution process may be made in respect of
the following corporate debtors, namely:—
(a) a corporate debtor with assets and income below a level as may be notified by the Central
Government; or
(b) a corporate debtor with such class of creditors or such amount of debt as may be notified by
the Central Government; or
(c) such other category of corporate persons as may be notified by the Central Government
A Small Company as defined under Section 2(85) of the Companies
Act, 2013., Start-up Company other than a Partnership Firm.
An Unlisted Company with total assets less than one crore rupees (as
reported in the books of the preceding financial year).
**WHO IS SMALL CO- **
A company that is not a public company
Its paid-up share capital is equal to or below ₹4 crore
Or such a higher amount specified not exceeding more than Rs.10
crores
A turnover equal to or below Rs.40 crore
Or such a higher amount specified not exceeding more than Rs.100
crore
Definition of Small Company does not apply to the
following companies:
WHO IS START UP?
It must be incorporated as a private limited company under the Companies Act,
2013, a partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, or a** limited
liability partnership under the Limited Liability Partnership Act,** 2008.
It must be up toseven years old from the date of its incorporation or registration.
For startups in the biotechnology sector, this period is extended to ten years.
Its turnover for any of the financial years since its incorporation or registration
must not have exceeded ₹25 crores.
It must be** working towards the innovation, development, or improvement** of
products, processes, or services, or have a scalable business model with a high
potential for generating employment or wealth.
It must not have been formed by the splitting up or reconstruction of an existing
business.
s56. time period for fastrack
(2) The resolution professional shall file an application to the Adjudicating Authority to extend the
period of the fast trackCIRP beyond 90 days if instructed to
do so by a resolution passed at a meeting of the committee of creditors and supported by a vote of 75% f the voting share.
(3) upon reciept of application AA can extend it but not exceeding forty-five days:
Provided that any extension of the fast track corporate insolvency resolution process under this
section shall not be granted more than once.
What are the requirements and process initiate Fast Track Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (Section 57)?
Section 57 allows a creditor or the corporate debtor to file for fast track CIRP before the NCLT. The application must include:
all the detailed procedural steps of a standard CIRP,
as outlined in Chapter II, must also be followed in an FTRP, but within
the compressed timeline.
These steps include:
Timeline Summary
Appointment of IRP = Day 0 (T)
Public Announcement = Within 3 Days (T+3)
Verification of Claims = Within 7 Days (T+7)
Formation of CoC = Within 21 Days (T+21)
Finalization of Insolvency Resolution Plan = Withing 90 Days (T+90)
[Extension 90+45 (maximum) if 75% voting for extension]
Homebuyers as Financial Creditors under IBC (Post-2020 Ordinance)
Key Change:
Before the 2020 Ordinance, homebuyers were not clearly recognized under IBC — so they couldn’t file insolvency cases against builders or participate in the Committee of Creditors.
Recognition:
Homebuyers are now treated as financial creditors because their payments to developers are considered “debts having the commercial effect of borrowing.”
Why?
Homebuyers disburse money upfront (e.g., booking + construction-linked payments). Developers use this money like interest-free borrowing to fund construction, and buyers expect a future asset (flat) in return — similar to lending and repayment.
Legal Basis:
Homebuyers = “Allottees” under Section 2(d), RERA → provides statutory support for treating them as financial creditors under IBC.
Effect:
Homebuyers can:
* Initiate insolvency against defaulting developers
* Participate + vote in the CoC and influence resolution process
Homebuyers & IBC — Col. Vinod Awasthy v. AMR Infrastructure Ltd. (2017)
Case Outcome:
NCLT held that a homebuyer claiming assured returns is not an operational creditor — the debt did not arise from goods/services. Thus, Section 9 IBC (operational creditor route) was not available.
Key Principle:
Homebuyer payments ≠ operational debt.
(Pre-amendment position — homebuyers weren’t recognized as financial creditors yet.)
Recourse for Homebuyers:
* RERA
* Consumer Protection Act
* IBC (for possession/allotment — not for recovery)
Application Threshold (IBC – Real Estate):
Minimum 100 allottees or 10% of total allottees (whichever is lower) must file jointly.
Upheld by Supreme Court in Manish Kumar v. Union of India.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India (Homebuyers & IBC Threshold Challenge)
Issue: Challenge to IBC amendment requiring 100 homebuyers or 10% of allottees (whichever lower) to jointly file CIRP.
Petitioners’ Arguments:
Respondents’ Position:
Supreme Court Held:
✅ Threshold constitutional & valid
✅ Prevents misuse; streamlines insolvency
❌ Does not dilute homebuyer rights
Homebuyers as a Class of Creditors under IBC
Why Classified as a Group:
Large number of homebuyers → impractical for each to sit on CoC.
Representation:
Voting:
Jaypee Infratech Insolvency (IBC Landmark)
Jaypee Infratech Insolvency (IBC Landmark)
Context:
Jaypee Infratech Ltd. (SPV of Jaiprakash Associates) planned ~32,000 housing units (Jaypee Wish Town). Due to funding issues, F1 circuit losses & approvals delays, only ~12,000 delivered despite majority buyer payments. JIL defaulted on bank dues (debt ~₹9,800+ Cr).
Key Events:
Importance:
🏛️ Recognised homebuyers as financial creditors
🛡️ Ensured representation in CoC
📌 Landmark in consumer rights under IBC
Nikhil Mehta & Sons HUF v. AMR Infrastructures Ltd. (IBC)
📌 Nikhil Mehta & Sons HUF v. AMR Infrastructures Ltd. (IBC)
Issue:
Whether homebuyers receiving “assured/committed returns” are mere purchasers or financial creditors under IBC.
Facts:
NCLT Finding:
NCLAT Reversal:
Principle Established:
Assured return real-estate schemes = financial debt; investors = financial creditors under IBC.
Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India (2019)
Context:
Challenge to the IBC (Second Amendment) Act, 2018, which classified homebuyers as financial creditors. Over 150 developers contested the amendment.
Builders’ Arguments:
Supreme Court Findings:
NCLT’s Gatekeeping Role (Key Principle):
Essence:
Homebuyers = Financial Creditors under IBC
IBC > RERA in case of conflict
NCLT must prevent misuse / speculative filings
section 32A clean slate?
📌 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020
Key Amendments (Effective 28.12.2019 via Ordinance):
1️⃣ Threshold for Real-Estate Creditors (Homebuyers)
Purpose:
Avoid misuse of IBC, prevent stoppage of real-estate projects due to individual/isolated petitions.
2️⃣ Introduction of Section 32A — “Clean Slate” for Corporate Debtor
Concept: Clean Slate / Ablution of Past Offences
BUT — Safeguard:
Essence:
Section 33 IBC: Initiation of Liquidation
When Liquidation Must Be Ordered by NCLT:
NCLT passes liquidation order if:
1️⃣ No resolution plan received within CIRP timeline under Sec. 12 / fast-track Sec. 56
OR
2️⃣ Resolution plan is rejected under Sec. 31 for non-compliance
Order Includes:
Liquidation by CoC Decision (Sec. 33(2))
(Explanation: CoC can resolve to liquidate even before Information Memorandum is prepared)
Liquidation for Plan Violation (Sec. 33(3) & (4))
Legal Consequences of Liquidation Order
✅ Essence:
Liquidation ordered when no viable plan, plan rejected/violated, or CoC chooses liquidation (66%).
Ends employment unless business continues; litigation mostly barred.
Section 34 IBC: Appointment of Liquidator & Fee
📌 Flashcard — Section 34 IBC: Appointment of Liquidator & Fee
Who Becomes Liquidator?
Effect of Appointment
When NCLT Must Replace RP (Sec. 34(4))
RP is replaced if:
1️⃣ Resolution plan rejected for not meeting Sec. 30(2)
2️⃣ IBBI recommends replacement (with recorded reasons)
3️⃣ RP fails to submit written consent under Sec. 34(1)
Appointment of New Liquidator (if RP replaced)
Liquidator’s Fee (Sec. 34(8)-(9))
Section 35 – Powers & Duties of Liquidator
Section 35 – Powers & Duties of Liquidator (Simplified Notes)
Once liquidation is ordered, the liquidator takes charge and performs the following functions:
✅ Key Powers & Duties
🔄 Consultation with Stakeholders
Essence of the Section
Liquidator fully controls the corporate debtor and undertakes all necessary steps to:
Regulation 31A – Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee (SCC)
Regulation 31A – Stakeholders’ Consultation Committee (SCC)
(Simplified Notes)
✅ Constitution of SCC
👥 Composition
🎯 Role / Purpose
🔀 Transition from CIRP
Brief Overview of Duties of the Liquidator
Take Control (Custody of Assets).
Verify Debts (Claims).
Realize Value (Evaluate and Sell Assets).
Investigate Misconduct (Avoidance Transactions).
Distribute Proceeds (Section 53 Waterfall).
Report to the Adjudicating Authority.
Section 36 – Liquidation Estate (IBC)
What it means:
Liquidator forms the Liquidation Estate = pool of assets belonging to Corporate Debtor (CD) that will be sold to pay creditors.
Held in fiduciary capacity for benefit of creditors.
✅ What is INCLUDED in Liquidation Estate
❌ What is NOT INCLUDED
🎯 Essence
> Liquidation estate = all assets owned by CD –
excluding third-party, trust, employee statutory funds & subsidiary assets
Sections 37 & 38 – Liquidator’s Info Powers & Consolidation of Claims
📌 Sections 37 & 38 – Liquidator’s Info Powers & Consolidation of Claims
Section 37 – Liquidator’s Power to Access Information
Liquidator can access info from:
Rights & Timelines
Section 38 – Consolidation of Claims
Liquidator duties
Who files how
Withdrawal/change
🎯 Essence
> Liquidator can access all major data systems; creditors can request info; claims must be filed fast (30 days) and liquidator must respond quickly (7 days).
39-42 liquidation
Section 39 Verification of Claims
Grants the Liquidator the authority to scrutinize, investigate, and
confirm the legitimacy and accuracy of every claim submitted by
creditors
(1) “The liquidator shall verify the claims submitted under section
38…”
The time limit for the Liquidator’s verification is not fixed in the Code
itself but is determined by IBBI
(2) The liquidator may require any creditor or the corporate debtor or
any other person to produce any other document or evidence which
he thinks necessary for the purpose of verifying the whole or any part
of the claim.
Section 40 Admission or Rejection of Claims
(1) The liquidator may, after verification of claims under section 39,
either admit or reject the claim, in whole or in part, as the case may
be
Provided that where the liquidator rejects a claim, he shall record in
writing the reasons for such rejection.
(2) The liquidator shall communicate his decision of admission or
rejection of claims to the creditor and corporate debtor within 7 days
of such admission or rejection of claims.
Section 41 Determination of valuation of claims.
The liquidator shall determine the value of claims admitted under
section 40 in such manner as may be specified by the Board.
Liquidator’s mandatory duty to assign a quantifiable, final monetary
figure to every accepted debt.
Section 42 Appeal against the decision of
liquidator.
A creditor may appeal to the Adjudicating Authority against the
decision of the liquidator [accepting or] rejecting the claims within 14
days of the receipt of such decision.
FLASHCARD — IBC: Sections 41, 42 & 52
🔹 Section 41 — Determination of Valuation of Claims
🔹 Section 42 — Appeal Against Liquidator’s Decision
🔹 Section 52 — Rights of Secured Creditors in Liquidation
Governs how secured creditors enforce or relinquish security during liquidation.
Secured creditor has two options:
Option 1 — Relinquish Security to Liquidation Estate
Option 2 — Realise Security Interest Independently
Key Requirements (Sub-sections 2–6)
Sub-sections 7–9
Surplus Proceeds
Costs Deduction
Deficit / Unpaid Amount
Section 53 – Distribution of Assets (Liquidation Waterfall):
FLASHCARD — Section 53 IBC: Distribution of Assets (Liquidation Waterfall)
🔹 Section 53(1): Order of Priority for Distribution of Liquidation Proceeds
Liquidation proceeds must be distributed strictly in the following order:
🔹 Section 53(2): Invalid Contractual Priority
🔹 Section 53(3): Liquidator’s Fees
🔹 Explanation
FLASHCARD — Key Principles of Section 53 (IBC Waterfall)
🔹 Pari Passu Treatment (Equal Ranking Rule)
When two categories share the same priority level (e.g., Workmen & Secured Creditors who relinquish security), they must be paid proportionately if funds are insufficient.
Distribution Ratio Formula:
[
\text{Distribution %} = \frac{\text{Available Funds}}{\text{Total Claims}}
]
Example:
[
\text{Distribution} = \frac{50}{150} = \frac{1}{3} = 33.33%
]
Payouts:
🔹 Supremacy of the Waterfall Mechanism
Section 53 begins with a non-obstante clause.
→ The IBC waterfall overrides all conflicting priority rules in other laws (e.g., tax statutes, state laws).
🔹 Disregarding Private Priority Contracts
If two creditors have equal statutory rank (e.g., unsecured creditors), any private agreement giving one preferential treatment must be ignored.
→ Ensures fairness & uniform treatment within each class.
🔹 Liquidator Fee Deduction
Liquidator’s fee is proportionately deducted from each class’s distribution.
→ Every class that benefits from liquidation contributes to the process cost.
FLASHCARD — Liquidation Cost (Reg. 2(ea), IBBI Liquidation Regulations, 2016)
🔹 What Are “Liquidation Costs”?
Defined under Regulation 2(ea) — these are the expenses that must be paid first in the Section 53 waterfall.
🔸 Components of Liquidation Cost
🔸 Not Included (Explicit Exclusion)
❌ Costs incurred solely for a Section 230 compromise/arrangement (e.g., legal fees for scheme).
These are not part of liquidation costs.
FLASHCARD — Liquidation Regulations (IBBI Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016)
Reg. 32 & 33 — How the Liquidator May Sell Assets
Reg. 32 & 33 — How the Liquidator May Sell Assets
🔹 Regulation 32 — Permitted Modes of Sale
The Liquidator may sell:
⚠️ Proviso:
If an asset is subject to a security interest, it cannot be sold under (a)–(d) unless the secured creditor has relinquished the security interest to the liquidation estate (as per Section 52).
🔹 Regulation 33 — Mode of Sale
1. Auction is the Default Rule
The Liquidator must ordinarily sell assets through auction, as per Schedule I.
2. Private Sale — Allowed Only in Limited Situations
Private sale is permitted only after consulting the Consultation Committee (Reg. 31A) and following Schedule I, when:
❌ Private sale to the following is prohibited without prior AA permission:
🔹 3. Collusion Safeguard
If the Liquidator believes there is collusion between:
→ The Liquidator must stop the sale, file a report to the AA, and seek appropriate orders.