Limitations of clinical trials
it must be remembered that RCTs and their meta-analyses are of variable
quality and validity.
Methodological considerations in bipolar trials
Social construct of psychiatric diagnoses reference
There is growing consensus that psychiatric diagnoses are akin to social constructs (Insel, 2014; Zachar and Kendler, 2007).
the optimal classification of disorders must await a quantum leap in our understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of abnormal behaviour.
RANZCP mood guidelines
Brief psychoeducation for mood disorders origin and development
The origins and development of mood disorders (however described) is definitively not known,
but it is certainly multi-factorial and the clinical expression is likely determined through a
combination of genetic predisposition, psychological vulnerabilities and life stressors. Interplay
of factors within these domains is thought to eventuate in brain/mind dysfunction. This
dysfunction is sometimes observable in neural changes, and is experienced subjectively as
distress that can manifest as overt behavioural change. Together these abnormalities result
in clinical signs and symptoms, which are grouped into syndromes and termed mood
disorders.
What is PMDD and why does it now exist
Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) is a new category included in DSM-5 to describe children who have persistent
irritability. Children with these symptom patterns are often found to go onto develop MDD, which is why this has been included within
depressive disorders. Previously, such children may have been diagnosed with paediatric bipolar disorder, which is conceptualised
as a more episodic illness and therefore a diagnosis of bipolar disorder is no longer appropriate in these cases. Part of the reason for
developing a diagnosis of DMDD is to stem the over-diagnosis of paediatric BD. However, this category remains contentious because of
its high comorbidity with other childhood disorders, and the potential risk of further over pathologising healthy children. It is best seen as
a category that enables further research on the natural history and best management of such presentations.
BD1 overview Episodes Depression: duration, severity Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity Possible psychosis
BD I Mania +/– hypomania \+/– depression
2Weeks
Marked
Impairment
Mania 7days most of the day nearly every day or hospitalisation
Marked
impairment
(Mania only)
Yes
BD II overview Episodes Depression: duration, severity Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity Possible psychosis
Hypomania
+Depression
2Weeks
Marked
Impairment
Hypomania 4 consecutive days, present most of the day nearly every day.
No marked
impairment
in hypomania, impairment in
depression
Cyclothymia Episodes Depression: duration, severity Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity Possible psychosis
Subthresholdc
hypomania +
subthreshold
depression
2 years with
no more than
two months
symptomfree
Clinically
significant
impairment
2years with
no more than
two months
symptom-free
Clinically
significant
impairment
No psychosis
Depression Episodes Depression: duration, severity Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity Possible psychosis
Depression 2Weeks Marked Impairment N/A N/A Yes
PDD Episodes Depression: duration, severity Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity Possible psychosis
Depression 2Weeks Clinically significant impairment
N/A
N/A
No
DMDD Episodes Depression: duration, severity Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity Possible psychosis
Chronic
irritability
and temper
outbursts
> 12mths
with no more
than 3mths
symptomfree
≥3 Temper
outbursts
per week.
Present in
≥2 settings
N/A
N/A
No
Episodes
Depression: duration, severity
Mania/Hypomania: duration, severity
Possible psychosis
Depression
Final week before menses to a few days after.
Causes distress or interference with functioning
N/A
N/A
No
Mood disorders specifiers
Illness pattern:
single, recurrent, rapid cycling, seasonal
Severity:
mild, moderate, severe
Remission status:
partial, full
Onset:
early, late, peripartum
Clinical features: anxious distress (mild, mod, mod-severe, severe), mixed features, melancholic, atypical, catatonic, psychotic (mood congruent, mood incongruent)
MDD epidemiology, illness characteristics, treatment responsiveness
Bipolar 1 epidemiology, illness characteristics, treatment responsiveness
Bipolar II epidemiology, illness characteristics, treatment responsiveness
Features that may distinguish bipolar and unipolar depression
FH, illness onset, onset/offset, comorbidity, duration of episodes, number of prior, mood symptoms, psychomotor sx, sleep disturbances, appetite changes, other sx
Bipolar: More likely FH, alcohol/substance use Early onset 20-25y Abrupt onset/offset ADHD comorbidity <6 months duration Multiple prior depressive episodes Lability of mood/manic episodes Psychomotor retardation Hypersomnia/increased daytime napping Hyperphagia Other ‘atypical’ depressive symptoms such as hypersomnia, hyperphagia, ‘leaden paralysis’ Somatic complaints Psychotic features and/or pathological guilt
Unipolar: FH bipolar, alcohol and substance less likely Late onset More gradual onset ADHD less common co-morbidity >6 months episodes Fewer prior episodes Depressed mood/low energy Psychomotor retardation less likely Initial insomnia/reduced sleep Appetite/weight loss Somatic complaints
Differential diagnoses of mood disorders
Overview BPSL treatments
2. Psychological Brief CBT F CBT IPT Mindfullness ACT Scehma therapy
3. Social Family psychoeducation Famil/friends Formal support groups Community groups Caregivers Employment Housing
4. Lifestyle Exercise Diet Smoking cessation Alcohol cessation Ceasing drugs Managing substance misuse Sleep
Why formulation is important in relation to diagnosis
Formulation
builds on diagnosis, which has reliability but lacks the validity of formulation because the
latter contextualises the problems of the individual and provides a richer understanding as
to why he or she is unwell now. Formulation is also necessary because both treatments and diagnoses have been derived from studies of groups whereas management of mood
disorders is an individual (personalised) endeavour; therefore it is important to understand
the person in the context of their unique circumstances
Recognition of reslience and strengths
Strengthening resilience in mood disorders
resilience to mood disorders can be strengthened biologically e.g.,
using lithium as a neuroprotective agent (Soeiro-de-Souza et al., 2012), psychologically
e.g., teaching cognitive reappraisal skills (Troy et al., 2010), socially e.g., improving social
support (Pietrzak et al., 2009), and through lifestyle change e.g., building exercise habits
(Hare et al., 2014)
Definition of a clinical response
A clinical response is defined as a significant reduction in signs/symptoms
and is normally quantified as a 50% reduction in the total score on a standardised
rating scale, such as the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Three stages of illness
‘The person with the disorder’ reference
Unlike acute illnesses, where the clinician’s expert tools
are the primary lever for change, chronic illness management centres on the person with
the disorder.
Consequently, while “current classification systems and the treatment science
that depends on them emphasise objective features of the case, clinicians must be equally attentive to the patient’s subjective experience of the disorder and the management they
are receiving” (Berk et al., 2004).