natrual law Flashcards

more critical engagement and general deeper (31 cards)

1
Q

key aspects

A
  • telos
  • beatific vision
  • four tiers of law
  • synderesis
  • teleological
  • primary precepts
  • secondary precepts
  • real and apparent goods
  • double effect
  • catholic manualists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

telos

A
  • natural law originates from aristotle
  • aristotle - distinctive feature of human beings is their ability to reason (to work towards their telos)
  • aquinas takes up aristotle’s idea that the telos of human life is to achieve eudaimonia
  • telos for humanity as a whole has an ultimate focus. complete happiness can only be seen in the beatific vision
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

four tiers of law

A
  • eternal - universal absolutes, made by god
  • divine - commandments given in god’s revelation
  • natural - discovered through human reason
  • human - laws humans make that cannot contradict divine law.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

synderesis

A
  • humans naturally inclined to seek good and avoid evil
  • all other precepts of natural law are based on this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 primary precepts

A

split into 5
1. worship god
2. ordered society
3. reproduction
4. learning and education
5. death (prevent it)
BUT aquinas wasnt giving a definitive list, this listing was done by later catholic manualists.
and Aquinas also said ‘and so forth’ to assert that his understanding wasn’t set in stone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

secondary precepts

A
  • derived from primary precepts, apply reason to find them out, and give us direction.
  • abortion
  • masturbation
  • euthanasia
  • contraception
  • polygamy (not against natural law as the man should be able to give reproduction to each wife BUT against divine law = Ephisians 5:21 (submit to husbands)
  • catholic church takes law literally but Aquinas intended it as a “principle”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

real and apparent goods

A
  • we can be confused about the difference.
    eg adultery is a short term pleasure v long term betrayal
  • vincible and invincible ignorance asw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

double effect

A

provide a moral framework for evaluating actions that have both a good and a bad effect, ensuring the action is permissible if it meets conditions
1) the action itself is morally good or neutral
2) the agent intends only the good effect, not the bad
3) the good effect is not produced by means of the bad effect
4) the good effect disproportionately outweighs in importance the bad effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

problems with double effect 4

s, c, jj, mc

A
  1. suicide is forbidden. case: a soldier throws himself on grenade, to save his comrades. but double effect would require him not to intend to sacrifice his life as intending own death is bad
  2. consequentialist ethics generally argues that any act should be judged on its results. eg tortuting sally to discover the whereabouts of a nuclear bomb. BUT ALSO at what point is torture permissible, to save how many?
  3. Judith Jarvis Thomson argues in her 1985 Ethics article that the principle of double effect doesn’t justify bombing a military target when civilians will predictably die, because the harm to innocent people outweighs the excuse of only intending to hit the target. She believes focusing on intent ignores the moral responsibility for known harm, making the principle weak for tough ethical choices like those in war.
  4. Alison McIntyre (Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2001): double effect’s emphasis on the agent’s intention is inherently subjective and difficult to verify, as agents can rationalize harmful actions by claiming they only intended the good effect, leading to potential misuse where intent is ambiguous.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

casuistry and manualist

A

applying laws with reason= criticism of those who are too concerned with rules and not enough with justice.

the catholic church has given great emphasis to rules and less orthopraxy = MANUALIST

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

matthew 6:2 - intentions

A

So when you give to the needy, do not sound a trumpet before you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

aristotle quote

A

“nature makes nothing without a purpose”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Louis Pojman

A

developed principle of double effect

notes that Aquinas’ position is absolutist. “humanity has an essentially rational nature, and reason can discover the right action in every situation”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cases

A
  • killing in self defence allowable
  • soldier throws himself on grenade ?
  • torturing sally for nuclear whereabouts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

strengths of natural law x4

A

+ absolutist, provide clarity and firm moral principles
+ the secondary precepts are intended to be reasoned within the context of a society = flexibility
+ primary precepts are general consensus on desirable goods in human life.
+ values life and rights. Grotius says that human rights are evident when looking at nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

weaknesses of natural law x3 gen

na, lae, outd

A
  • naturalistic fallacy, guilty of observing nature then making the leap to say this is what should happen
    = bring in Hume is/ought gap
  • focus on lae and rules are overly legalistic
    = but counter that is manualists, Aq said “principles” and “and so forth”
  • natural law is outdates. society has moved onto modern attitudes to homosexuality, contraception etc
16
Q

weakness of telos x2

A
  • wrong to assume there is a purpose to all of us, it would be more obvious surely as reason alone does not always work in dilemmas
  • existentialists critique that there may not be a telos at all. (ex = human existence rather than essence - humans are free and dont have a fixed nature)
17
Q

more arguments to give and counter x3

bbw, r,nr

A

+ offers best of both worlds where firm primary precepts but flexible when applying secondary precepts.
BUT - there is tension between the idea that natural law is “universal in its precepts” and “application of the natural law varies greatly” (CATECHISM 1956-7)

+Reliance on reason makes it fairly rational.
BUT - some think eg calvin that it reduces the role of scripture. also augustine thinks we have lost rational facilities in the fall

+ natural law defends natural rights
BUT Bentham says natural rights are “nonsense on stilts”

18
Q

books aquinas, aristotle, catholics

A

aquinas - summa theologica
aristotle - Physics II 3
catechism of the catholic church 1956-7

19
Q

Rachels criticism

A

just because sex means reproduction, doesn’t mean this is its only purpose

20
Q

John Finnis x2

A

it upholds natural rights

also proves it is adaptable as although he rejects god, he puts forth a version without god

21
Q

Polkinghorne

A

science can answer the what but not the why = cannot rule anything out

22
Q

jeremiah 29:13

A

“the plans and the purposes that god has for human beings” = TELOS

23
Q

francis bacon

A

only the material and the efficient causes are scientific, formal and final are not

24
sean carol
purpose is not built into the "architecture" of the universe
25
synderesis dawkins
- synderesis weak to dawkins and freud. also weak to rahner and augustine
26
secondary precepts - pope pious criticism
- unclear conclusions and ambiguity - use example of Pope Paul VI's encyclical which argued that obedience to natural law meant contraception shouldn't be used. BUT could be argued that birth control means the child would be cared for and wouldnt lead to over-population
27
calvin on natural law (and barth
- calvin said that scripture is the word of god so that is all you should follow. and barth - "the finite has no capacity for the infinite" links to the fall, shouldnt have human or natural
28
hobbes and karl barth
barth - human nature is fallen Hobbes - "men would have the whole earth if they could" = NO SYNDERESIS
29
sartre critique
no telos as existence precedes essence = we exist 1st then choose purpose
30
fletcher critique
wanted more relativism and more focus on agape rather than legalism