AO1: investigative psychology
AO1: geograpahic profiling
AO3: investigative psychology: strength- evidence from meta analysis
however, data base doesn’t show all crimes
P: evidence for investigative psychology from meta analysis
E: used small space analysis, found that several behaviours identified as common in different crimes
E: this helps establish whether two or more offences were committed by the same person
L: shows that investigative psychology is useful
HOWEVER, data base only shows crimes that have links between them. So new criminals or criminals the have not been found will not be in the data base
AO3: geographical profiling: strength- evidence from Canter
however, low pop validity
P: evidence from Canter
E: they collected info from 120 murder cases involving serial killers in the US
E: small space analysis reveals spatial consistency in the behaviour of the killers. Creates circle around killers home base/operation base
L: shows evidence for geographical profiling
HOWEVER, they only looked at serial killer and ones in the US, this means it is culturally bias and the finding can’t be generalised to target population.
AO3: strength- more scientific than top down
P: more scientific than top down
E: it is more grounded in evidence and psychological theory, less driven by speculation.
E: with aid of AI, investigators are able to manipulate geographical data quickly to produce insights that assist the investigation
AO3: limitation- profile may be wrong
P: profile may be wrong
E: rachel nickels case, the real murderer was ruled out at an early stage due to being several inches taller than the profile.
E: lead to main suspect being harmed as he got in a relationship with an undercover police woman