who developed top down profiling?
Douglas in 1986, then edited it in 2006
what is offender Profiling?
top down profiling process?
steps of TDA
data collected including the descriptions of the crime scene, background info of the victim, details of the crime
3 & 4. criminal profile
3 & 4.crime assessment
defining crime as a psychologist
crime: unlawful act that can be punished by the state causes harm to individuals, groups, or society
- must be aware of factors: culture plays a key part in what is deemed criminal, acts may be harmful but not criminal and vice versa
strengths of top-down approach
RESEARCH SUPPORT
- Copson: interviewed 184 us officers, 82% said useful, 90% would use again, offers diff perspective even if it doesn’t lead to the offender
- technique has many benefits, useful in investigations
REAL-LIFE APPLICATION
- meketa: applying TDA to non-violent crimes leads to an 85% rise in cases solved by adding 2 new categories (interpersonal and opportunistic)
- wider application to a variety of crimes, increases external validity
limitations of top-down approach
CAN MISLEAD INVESTIGATIONS
-Robert napper initially ruled out of Rachel Nickell’s murder for being inches taller than the profile
- delays/reduces the likelihood of offenders being caught
CATEGORIES TOO SIMPLISTIC
- canter et al: analysed 100 murders found evidence of distinct organised but not disorganised
- categorisation not the best approach, continuum more appropriate than distinct categories