What is offender profiling?
What is the American approach?
top down approach
- Originated in 1970s by FBI
- Behavioural science unit used interviews with 36 sexually motivated murderer including Ted Bundy and Charles Manson
- Concluded data could be categorised as organised and disorganised crimes
What does the American Approach consist of?
Each category has certain characteristics
- If data from a future crime scene matched those characteristics, we can predict other characteristics that might be likely
- used to find the offender
What does Top Down mean?
You collect data about the crime and then decide which category it fits into
What are the characteristics of organised offenders?
What are disorganised offenders?
What are the 4 key terms involved in constructing an FBI profile?
Data assimilation, crime scene classification, crime reconstruction and profile generation
What is data assimilation?
Review the evidence (crime scene photos etc)
What is crime scene classification?
Organised/disorganised
What is crime reconstruction?
Sequence of events and behaviour of victim
What is profile generation?
Hypothesis related to the likely offender, demographics, physical characteristics and behaviour
What are strengths of the top down approach?
Why is Canter et Al’s analysis a strength?
> Smallest-space analysis was used
(identifies correlations across different
samples of behaviour)
Assessed the co-occurence of aspects of serial killings
Included whether there was torture,
restraints etc
Revealed features of serial killings matching FBI typology for organised
offenders
Why is adaptation a strength?
Meketa top down profiling recently applied to
burglary
- 85% rise in solved cases in 3 US States
- 2 new categories have been added
- interpersonal (usually
knows victim and steals item) opportunistic
(inexperienced young offender)
What are limitations of top down approach?
Why is evidence against organised/disorganised a limitation?
Lots of combinations occur at different
murder scenes
- Godwin: it’s hard to classify killers as
one or the other
- Killers have contrasting characteristics
- Organised killers sometimes act
unorganized
and vice versa
- tell us little
about how that offender acts in everyday
life
Why is the use of murder interviews a limitation?
Canter et al: argued that the sample was poor
- It wasn’t a random or large sample and didn’t include
different types of offenders
- Each interview was not standardised
- Not completely sound or scientific