Approach Ban (Non-LVO’s) - Location?
1,000’ AGL
Approach Ban (Non-LVO’s) - general criteria?
TDZ RVR continually less than specified minima for landing.
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - location?
1,000’ AGL
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - general criteria?
Controlling RVR continually less than RVR Zone Requirements
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - TDZ RVR requirements?
Always required unless:
- Conducting CAT III FO landing with FO or FP rollout and;
- MID and END RVR’s available
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - TDZ RVR requirements?
Always required unless:
- Conducting CAT III FO landing with FO or FP rollout and;
- MID and END RVR’s available
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - MID RVR requirements?
Required if END RVR not providing valid reports (not including CAT I SA)
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - END RVR requirements?
Required if MID RVR not providing valid reports (not including CAT I SA)
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - END RVR not required?
- CAT I SA
- CAT III with a rollout system
- Any other LVO IAP if MID RVR is not providing valid reports
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - TDZ RVR value?
As per approach chart
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - MID RVR values?
- CAT III + FO rollout = 75m
- Other instrument approach = 125m
- CAT III, no FO rollout = 175m
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - END RVR value?
75m
Approach Ban (LVO’s) - TDZ RVR not required?
3 requirements:
- CAT III with FO landing
- FO or FP rollout
- MID and END RVR
Missed Approach - Primary reasons?
- During final segment, a/c flown outside of tolerances for approach type
- GNSS approach, sustained deviation from centreline
- Below MSA, navaid become unreliable or inoperative
MOS 15.11
- RNP APCH or PA, a/c arrived at the minimum altitude; or has passed the minimum altitude but has not touched down, or
- RNP APCH or NPA, a/c has arrived at the missed approach point; or is being operated below minimum altitude; and any of the following apply:
» the aircraft is not continuously in a position from which a descent to a landing on the intended runway
– at a normal rate of descent
– using normal manoeuvres
– that allows touchdown to occur within the TDZ of the runway for the intended landing, and
» for other than low-visibility operations – flight visibility is less than the landing minima, or none of the following visual references for the intended runway or FATO are distinctly visible and identifiable to the pilot: • elements of the approach lighting system • the threshold • the threshold markings • the threshold lights • the runway identification lights • the FATO itself • the visual approach slope indicator • the touchdown zone or touchdown zone markings • the touchdown zone lights • the FATO or runway lights.
» for low-visibility operations, the following visual references for the intended runway are not continuously visible and identifiable to the pilot: – for a CAT III approach using a fail operational (FO) landing system where use of a DH is prescribed – at least 1 centreline light – for a CAT III approach using a fail-passive (FP) landing system – at least 3 consecutive longitudinally-aligned lights – for a CAT III approach using an FO hybrid landing system – at least 3 consecutive longitudinally-aligned lights
MOS 15.11
Missed Approach (LVO’s) - visibility requirements CAT III + FO and DH
at least 1 centreline light
MOS 15.11
Missed Approach (LVO’s) - visibility requirements CAT III + FP
at least 3 consecutive longitudinally-aligned lights
MOS 15.11
Missed Approach (LVO’s) - visibility requirements CAT III + FO hybrid
at least 3 consecutive longitudinally-aligned lights
MOS 15.11
Landing Minima - TDZ not available?
800m
MOS 15.10
Landing Minima - approach lighting >420m not available?
800m
MOS 15.10
Landing Minima - FD and AP not available?
1200m
MOS 15.10
Landing Minima - warning system for EADI and EHSI not available?
1200m
MOS 15.10
Landing Minima - HIRL not available?
1200m
MOS 15.10
Landing Minima - approach lighting >210m not available?
1200m
MOS 15.10
