purposeful practice among people
what is the gold standard of practice?
Deliberate practice is the gold standard of practice that everyone should aspire to
common characteristics of fields with widely accepted training methods:
Ericsson et al. violin study method
studied the performance of great, very good, and good musicians to see what differentiated them
Ericsson et al. violin study findings
Ericsson et al. violin study takeaways
Ericsson et al. ballet dancers study
found a similarly strong relationship between practice time and accomplishments in ballet dancers
2 ways deliberate practice is different from purposeful practice
principles of deliberate practice
can you use deliberate practice in a field that is not well-established?
yes
example of deliberate practice in a field that is not well-developped
Feng Wang used images of objects and maps of physical locations to encode digits in his long-term memory
problem with subjective judgments
they are inherently vulnerable to all sorts of biases
are “experts” always experts?
In many fields, people who are seen as experts are not experts
Hodgson’s wine experts and expertise study
Hodgson found that wine experts will rate the same wine differently; their ratings aren’t consistent
Dawes psychologists and expertise study
found that licensed psychologists and psychiatrists were no better at performing psychotherapy than people who had received minimal treatment
financial experts and expertise study
Many studies have shown that financial experts are no better than novices or random chance of picking stocks effectively
general practitioners and expertise study
General practitioners with several decades of experience perform worse on several objective measures of performance than newly-trained doctors, likely because younger doctors attended medical school more recently and remember their training better
how can you identify an expert performer in a field?
what should you do once you’ve identified an expert in a field?
importance of a good coach or teacher
Gladwell’s 10,000-hour rule
it takes 10,000 hours to become an expert at anything
problems with the 10,000-hour rule
the core message of the 10,000-hour rule
in pretty much any endeavour, people have a tremendous capacity to improve their performance as long as they train the right way