Describe purpose of The Sherman Act
- insurers could no longer form groups to control rates and coverage
Describe purpose of The Robinson-Patman Act
What was the defense used by SEUA?
Paul v. Virginia ruled that insurance was not interstate commerce and therefore it was not subject to federal antitrust laws
What was the decision on SEUA by the U.S. Supreme Court?
Decision overturned ruling by deciding insurance was interstate commerce, and federal legislation now applied to insurance
Describe the activities of the NAIC in the wake of the SEUA decision
NAIC sought to appeal the decision. When the appeal was denied, NAIC sought to continue state regulation resulting in passage of McCarran-Ferguson Act.
Outcome and Impact of Paul v. Virginia
Outcome: ruling that insurance was not interstate commerce and it should be regulated by the states and not the federal government.
Impact: regulated by states, bureau ratemaking allowed
Outcome and Impact of US v SEUA
Outcome: ruling that insurance was interstate commerce and therefore it was subject to federal regulation
Impact: bureau ratemaking not allowed, federal antitrust laws (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, Federal Trade Commission Act) apply
Outcome and Impact of McCarran-Ferguson Act
Outcome: returned insurance regulation to the states and exempted insurance from federal antitrust law provided that relevant activities were regulated by the states and did not involve boycott, coercion, or intimidation
Impact: bureau ratemaking was allowed as long as it was regulated by the states. Most states passed prior approval regulation
Identify 4 activities of the SEUA that led to criminal indictments
Describe 2 main questions considered by the Supreme Court in analyzing the SEUA case
Purpose of excess & surplus lines market
to provide coverage for unusual risks with high policy limits, or those that cannot find coverage in the admitted market in the state
3 ways the excess & surplus lines market is regulated
3 exceptions for McCarran-Ferguson Act
Describe purpose of Clayton Anti-Trust Act
5 arguments in favor of Congress’ regulation of insurance in the SEUA decision
Argument for and against compacts
good: in the public’s best interest if it prevents insolvencies
bad: compacts deter open and free competition which can lead to excessive profits
In 1948, the NAIC approved two model rate regulation bills. What were the two main purposes of these bills?
Describe the NAIC model rate regulation bills
In 1947, the NAIC adopted the Act Relating to Unfair Methods of Competition with the purpose to preempt application of the FTC Act to insurance industry. List 7 activities deemed to be unfair and deceptive
After McCarren, describe 3 insurance regulatory actions to help with the concerns of insurer insolvencies
After McCarran, briefly describe three ways regulators have addressed unavailable or unaffordable insurance coverages
Availability:
Affordability
Describe the actions taken by the National Insurance Convention (NIC) when formed in 1871
Describe the difficulty to insurers when they began writing auto insurance in addition to property
List 3 market failures and imperfections that Regulation is particularly concerned with