Hard Power
Hard power is coercive power, involving the more physical elements of military and economic power (forms of command power).
Hard power uses methods to compel other nation states into obedience to its will.
Joseph Nye on Hard Power
“The ability to use the carrots and sticks of economic and military might to make others follow your will”
What is a recent and relevant example of military power coercing action?
Annexation of Crimea –> The international community could not respond as Russia is a nuclear power
How can economic power coerce action?
Recent/ Relevant examples?
Through sanctions or the threat of sanctions, this is significant as states economies are so interlinked. Aid, America can threaten to withdraw aid.
e.g. Sanctions against Russia post Crimea
Why do realists favour hard power?
This is because realists view nation states as egotistical. In the resulting anarchic world system, the most effective way of achieving your objectives is thus through hard power because that is the only effective way of deterring the aggressive impulses of other states and so resolving the ‘security dilemma’ in your favour.
Questioning the relevance of hard power:
Military
–> strength declining in significance and impact
e.g. Despite the USA’s military supremacy, it was unable to secure a victory in Vietnam, and struggled in Afghanistan
Questioning the relevance of hard power:
Public opinions
e.g. The USA’s reliance on hard power has arguably discredited the nation and led to disillusionment with its foreign policy
Overview of the declining significance of hard power
–> Nonetheless, it may be declining in significance and legitimacy
Why is the USA widely regarded as the powerful state in the world?
• The USA is widely regarded as the most powerful state in the world, due to its
Factors that determine a state’s power:
Factors that determine a state’s power:
Alliances
→ Project power - numerous military sites around the world
→ NATO - collective security
→ Diplomatic strength
Factors that determine a state’s power:
Economic power
→ Often measured by GDP, but also other factors
→ Can use their economic power in the form of sanctions - carry incredible weight
e.g. USA
→ Largest economy in the world
Factors that determine a state’s power:
Cultural influences
Cultural Influence
→ A state’s global outreach
e.g. USA
→ Use media to promote western values
Factors that determine a state’s power:
Structural Power
Structural Power
→ The ability to influence other states through IGOs
USA:
Soft Power
• The ability to influence other actors by persuading them to follow or agree to norms and aspirations that produce desired behaviour.
“Globalisation has limited the impact of soft power”
- explain why this is wrong
Globalisation, interdependence and technological innovation have increased the significance of soft power.
Joseph Nye on soft power
“Soft Power is everything from Hollywood to Harvard”
“When one country gets other countries to want what it wants”
Great Powers
• States which have global interests and global influence.
–> Having some influence over the major intergovernmental institutions.
e.g. UK has a permanent place on the UNSC
• States will have a formidable military and economic might and will often be nuclear powers.
Super Powers
• Powers which have global interests and are able to dominate global affairs rather than merely influencing them.
–> America having a plurality of the voting power of the Bretton Woods institutions
Why America is arguably a superpower
• $596 billion spent on its military
–> 1/3 of the worlds military spending
• China has the largest standing army in the world, BUT:
Balance of power
Bipolarity:
During the Cold War:
2 centres of power USA and USSR
Both were Superpowers Significantly greater hard power than any other state
Equally matched
Competing for dominance A nuclear arms race
Neo- Realist view on bipolarity
Neo Realists such as Kenneth Waltz believe that cold war bipolarity actually had some positive features because:
As states behave rationally, conflict could be avoided as in a bipolar era as they both have equal power it doesn’t serve the interest of one to enter into conflict with another as it would result in mutually assured destruction. The chance for miscalculation with bipolarity is much lower as you only have to worry about 1 other state, you know who your enemies are.
What is the liberal view of bipolarity?
On the other hand, liberals fear the instability of bipolarity as it fosters distrust and suspicion.
The rest of the world is held hostage in a “balance of terror”.
–> Liberals believe that the peace in bipolarity is very artificial and not meaningful.
Liberals fear how the power of IGOs become redundant as they value IGOs as key forums for peace and cooperation.
The reliance on hard power is seen as illegitimate, they reject the power politics of realism.
Actually, the chance of miscalculation is high, far higher than neo-realists realise