When Form 8275 cannot avoid accuracy-related penalty
The accuracy-related penalty attributable to the following types of misconduct cannot be avoided by disclosure on Form 8275:
Tax return preparer
Tax return requirements (Primary)
Preparer with primary responsibility for accuracy of return MUST sign the return, enter PTIN on return, and give a copy of the return to the taxpayer no later than when presented for signature.
Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN) requirement
All paid tax return preparers (including attorneys, CPAs, and enrolled agents) must have a PTIN in order to prepare a federal tax return.
Standards for tax return positions
Tax return positions taken by a preparer must be reasonable.
Preparer failures that result in $60 penalty (5)
A penalty of $60 for each occurrence up to a maximum of $30,000 a year for any failure relating to a return or claim for refund filed in 2024, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect:
Penalties for fraud
Appealing preparer penalties
A preparer has 30 days to pay the penalty upon receipt of a demand for payment. The preparer can pay 15% of the penalty and file a claim for refund. If denied (or six months have passed), the preparer has 30 more days to begin a court proceeding to determine liability.
Preparer failures that result in $600 penalty
$600 per failure, no maximum penalty, for any failure relating to a return or claim for refund filed in 2024—reasonable cause exception does not apply:
Understatement of liability §6694
A practitioner must not sign a tax return or claim for refund that the practitioner knows or reasonably should know contains an unreasonable position. No penalty if there is a reasonable cause and the preparer acted in good faith, otherwise the following penalties apply:
Unauthorized disclosure or use of tax return information
Reasonable basis
Substantial authority
More likely than not
The more likely than not standard is the standard that is met when there is a greater than 50% likelihood of the position being upheld.
Frivolous position
A frivolous position has no basis for validity in existing law or has been deemed frivolous by the U.S. Tax Court or another federal court.
Which standard of authority is the most stringent? Also, order of authority
The substantial authority standard is less stringent than the more likely than not standard but more stringent than the reasonable basis standard.
Most stringent to least stringent:
- more likely than not
- substantial authority
- reasonable basis
Tax evasion
Evasion involves some affirmative act to evade or defeat a tax, or payment of tax. Examples of affirmative acts are deceit, subterfuge, camouflage, concealment, attempts to color or obscure events, or make things seem other than they are. Common evasion schemes include:
Tax avoidance
Avoidance of tax is not a criminal offense. Taxpayers have the right to reduce, avoid, or minimize their taxes by legitimate means. One who avoids tax does not conceal or misrepresent but shapes and preplans events to reduce or eliminate tax liability within the parameters of the law.
Standard of authority for tax shelter position
Disclosure
Negligence and Fraud
Negligence is a failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the provisions of the tax code or a failure to exercise the ordinary and reasonable care that a reasonable person would exercise when completing a tax return.
Fraud, unlike negligence, is a willful attempt to evade or defeat a lawful tax. Affirmative acts of fraud are actions taken by the taxpayer, return preparer and/or promoter to deceive or defraud.
When Form 8275 cannot avoid accuracy-related penalty (6)
The accuracy-related penalty attributable to the following types of misconduct cannot be avoided by disclosure on Form 8275:
Period of Limitations
E-File process