Price Optimization Flashcards

(18 cards)

1
Q

Price Optimization vs Traditional Ratemaking Techniques (3 differences)

A

○ Price optimization is a process that uses
§ Big data (data mining of insurance & non-insurance personal info where permitted by law
§ Advanced statistical modeling
○ Price optimization makes granular adjustments to indicated rates
§ Specific risk classifications, or even individual insureds)
○ Traditional ratemaking techniques were judgmental and applied only on a broad level
§ e.g. territory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 Principles in the CAS “Statement of Principles Regarding Property and Casualty Insurance Ratemaking”

A
  1. A rate is an estimate of the expected value of future costs
  2. A rate provides for all costs associated with the transfer of risk
  3. A rate provides for all the costs associated with an individual risk transfer
  4. A rate is reasonable and not excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory if it is an actuarially sound estimate of the expected value of all future costs associated with an individual risk transfer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Price Optimization

A

○ The process of maximizing or minimizing a business metric
○ Uses sophisticated tools and models to quantify business considerations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cost-based rate

A

The traditional actuarially derived rate based on loss costs, LAE, and other expenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Price elasticity of demand

A

○ The change in quantity demanded versus the price
§ High elasticity –> consumers will shop around even if prices only go up a little (savvy consumers)
§ Low elasticity –> price doesn’t have much effect on demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ratebook optimization

A

Adjust factors in a cost-based rating structure using a demand model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Individual Price Optimization

A

Build a pricing structure based on both cost and demand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hybrid Optimization

A

Insert a new rate factor based on demand (into an existing cost-based structure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Constrained Optimization

A

○ Setting minimum and maximum limits on a model’s output
○ Note that unconstrained optimization does not impose these limits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3 Main differences between traditional ratemaking and price optimization

A
  1. Difference 1
    i. Traditional: applied at class level
    ii. Price optimized: can be applied to individual policies
  2. Difference 2
    i. Traditional: uses cost-basis pricing
    ii. Price optimized: incorporates non-cost-based considerations like propensity to shop around
  3. Difference 3
    i. Traditional: deviations from indicated rates are subjective
    ii. Price optimized: deviations from indicated rates are based on quantitative models
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Other differences between traditional ratemaking and price optimization

A

○ TRADITIONAL RATEMAKING will assign the SAME price to identical risks, but PRICE OPTIMIZATION may assign DIFFERENT prices
○ TRADITIONAL RATEMAKING is generally accepted by regulators whereas PRICE OPTIMIZATION may not be accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Benefits of price optimization

A

○ Provides more accurate pricing
○ If optimization is applied on a ratebook level, it is not unfairly discriminatory
○ Note that individual optimization MAY be unfairly discriminatory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Drawbacks of price optimization

A

○ Regulators don’t have the data to independently verify rates based on price optimization
○ The models (often GLMs) can produce large individual rate swings (can be controlled by constraints)
○ No evidence of improved stability from using price optimization
○ Concern that ratemaking ASOPs may be violated (if rates are unfairly discriminatory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Possible regulatory responses to price optimization plans

A
  • Possible regulatory responses to price optimization plans
    ○ Determine PERMISSIBILITY with respect to state laws
    ○ Define regulatory CONSTRAINTS (min/max rate swings, methods apply only to rate classes of at least a certain size)
    ○ Transparency: require FULL EXPLANATION of
    § DAM (Data/Methods/Assumptions)
    § Rate differences between customers with identical risk profiles (if any)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Disclosures a regulator may require when price optimization is used in a rate filing

A

○ Rate adjustments that are not cost-based may include judgmental selections)
○ WHETHER price optimization was used
○ WHICH rating factors are affected by price optimization and their quantitative impact
○ WHETHER customers with the same risk profile have different rates
○ Data sources and models that affected the rate charged in any way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Recommendations of the Task Force on Price Optimization regarding pricing methodology

A

○ Rates should be cost-based
○ Rates should comply with state law
○ Customers with identical risk profiles should be charged the same rate (aside from temporary differences)

17
Q

Rating considerations that the Task Force believes are unfairly discriminatory

A

○ Price elasticity of demand
○ Propensity to shop for insurance
○ Retention adjustment at an individual level
○ A policyholder’s propensity to ask questions or file complaints

18
Q

Recommendations of the Task Force on Pricing Optimization regarding state regulatory practices

A

○ ISSUE bulletin addressing use of non-cost-based methods
○ ENHANCE disclosure requirements for rate fillings
○ ENSURE compliance with state laws and actuarial principles by analyzing insurer’s rating models