what is prior restraint
when the gov stops you from saying something
key takeaway from near
Newspaper wrote a paper that gov in MN was corrupt and running a bootlegging operation
MN statute allows for an injunction
was the statute a permissible prior restraint?
no; can only issue it in exceptional cases ; Only can have prior restraint for compelling government interest, like national security
what is the standard of review for a prior restraint
SS; Restriction must be narrowly tailored and serve a compelling government interest
what is the restriction on a prior restraint
the restraint on speech cannot be content based and overly inclusive (see simon & Shuster)
simon & Shuster key takeway
Son of sam law
After the serial killer was arrested, people began to sell stuff and books about the crime
Son of sam law prohibited those who commit crimes from getting compensated
Issue? → its a prior restraint that can only stand if it passes SS
while there was a compelling intrest re stopping crime, it was not narrowly tailored because it would encompass alot of different types of media like a book written by Malcom X
key takeaway from Bank julius Baer
Wikileaks created a website to leak untraceable material, leading Julius Baer Bank and Trust Company to sue in federal court. Baer sought a temporary restraining order to stop Wikileaks from disseminating private banking records, which the court granted, along with a permanent injunction disabling the Wikileaks domain.
A court must consider the likely efficacy of an injunction in serving its intended purpose to decide whether it is proper to issue the injunction
key takeaway from Grosjean
Imposed a tax on newspapers that had a circulation of 60k
Gov put it into place knowing it would punish newspapers he didn’t like
Government cannot place a selective tax on just newspapers that it does not like – can have a general tax, but cannot be selective
keytakeaway from Tinker
black armband in school protest
School cannot prohibit student speech unless it materially/SSLY disrupts educational mission or invades rights of other students
key takeaway from Fraser
(lewd speech in the school)
School can restrict student speech if its lewd/offensive
key takeaway from Hazelwood
student written arcticle that had some of the stories taken out
Schools can regulate school sponsored and curricula speech is there is a legit pedagogical concern
School was allowed to remove student articles from the school newspaper because there was a legit edu concern
key takeawy from morse
Bong hits for jesus
School can censor and prohibit speech reasonably regarded as encouraging illegal drug use
key takeaway from Mahoney
the snap story w the cheerleader
regulation of student speech off campus
Presumption against regulation of off campus speech
Off campus speech can be regulated if there is a nexus between the off campus speech and on campus activity
The school could not regulate the speech at issue in this case – the vulgar comments on snapchat post did not impact the school… even though comments were about school activities, it did not impact the school directly
key takwawy from Darino
One case where student wore Trump shirt about boarder and one case where students wore American flag shirts on Cinco de Mayo
can the school restrict?
Trump shirt – political statement… school had sent him home and he ended up winning – no disruption
Flag shirts – shirts had potential to and did cause disruption, so court upheld the school prohibiting them from wearing the shirt
what are time place and manner restrictions
Restrictions on when where and how you can say things
what are public forums
space where you can pretty much say what you want and speak on any topic
when are time place manner restrictions in public forums appropriate (3 elements)
Are content neural
Narrowly tailored to serve an important gov interest and
Leave open an ample alternative means of communication
what are nonpublic forum time place manner restrictions evaluated on
reasonableness
what is a limit on time place manner restrictions
gov cant restrict based on continent but you can restrict via delivery
what is the unique rule about time place manner restrictions when it comes to national parks
Even though park is government space, having protests can impede use/enjoyment of the park, so gov can limit protest to a particular area of the park
are time place manner restriction on newsracks allowed
Regulations regarding placement or design of news racks on city streets allowed
key takeaway from McCullen
Protests outside abortion center; painted 35 ft line in street showing boundary for protesters
Constitutional?
court said the 35 ft boundary not narrowly tailored
what is the rule about restricting protests in malls (ie non public forums/private)
A private shopping mall may constitutionally exclude picketing on its premises even if that picketing relates to the actual activities of its tenant stores
is social meida a public forum/
No; they are privately owned. Doesn’t matter what the function is