Private Nuisance Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

Define the tort of Private Nuisance

A

an unlawful, indirect interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must claimants have in a land

A

They must have a legal interest in the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case for legal interest

A

Hunter v Canary Wharf - Claimants who did not own or were not tenants could not claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Identify Defendant definition

A

Any person whose activities cause unlawful interference with another’s use or enjoyment of the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Defendant adopted the nuisance case

A

Sedleigh v O’Callaghan : D knew of installed pipe but did nothing about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Defendant authorizing nuisance

A

Tetley v Chittey : D knew lease for go - karting would cause nuisance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Defendant (Natural Act)

A

Leakey v National Trust : D knew land could slip which it did, damaging C’s cottage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interference definition

A

Causing physical damage or loss of enjoyment in the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interference Noise Case

A

Sturges v Bridgman : Vibrations from industrial machinery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Interference Smell Case

A

Bliss v Hall : Fumes from neighbouring land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interference Continuous

A

Miller V Jackson : Cricket balls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Interference Shops

A

Laws v Florinplace: adult shop in a residential area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain Unlawful

A

Court will ask itself whether it is reasonable for the claimant to have to suffer particular interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Unlawful - Locality Case

A

Sturges v Bridgman : caused substantial and unreasonable interference with a neighbours use of their property, even if activity existed first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Unlawful - Duration Case

A

Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton: D’s firework display lasted 20 minutes and debris caused physical damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unlawful - Degree of Interference Case

A

Murdoch v Glacier Metal: No nuisance as there was a considerable amount of noise from a nearby road

Must materially interfere with ordinary existence to be unlawful

17
Q

Unlawful - Sensitivity of Claimant Case

A

Bridlington Relay v Yorkshire Electricity: No nuisance as power cables would not have interfered with an ordinary use of land

18
Q

Unlawful - Social Utility Case

A

Denis v Ministry of Defence: Nuisance with award of damages as flights were needed to allow country to defend itself

19
Q

Unlawful - Malice Case

A

Christie v Davey: D annoyed of piano so banged on wall. Unlawful as it was deliberate

20
Q

Types of Defences

A
  • Statutory Authority
  • Prescription
21
Q

Types of Remedies

A
  • Injunction
  • Damages
  • Abatement
22
Q

Statutory Authority

A

Public body is allowed to cause a nuisance if it is acting in accordance with legislation

23
Q

Statutory Authority Case

A

Allen v Gulf Oil Refining: Oil Refinery was built under powers contained in an Act of Parliament

24
Q

Prescription

A

If D has committed a nuisance without objection from C for a period of twenty years, no liability arises

25
Prescription Case
Sturges v Bridgman: D's business only became a nuisance when clt moved next door, so period of time was not long enough to qualify
26
Injunction
Court order either prohibiting or controlling an activity
27
Injunction Case
Kenaway v Thompson: Injunction granted to limit the use of the lake, close to C's house, for the racing of motor boats
28
Damages Case
Shelfer v City of London Electrical Lightin co set out that damages should replace an injunction when: - Injury to Clts rights was small - clt can be compensated by a small amount of money
29
Abatement
Clt takes reasonable steps to deal with any nuisance themselves
30
Abatement Case
Lemmon v Webb: Clt chopped down overhanging branches to avoid a nuisance