Definition of Nuisance
An unlawful indirect interference with a person’s use or enjoyment of land
1st Element
Identify Claimant
What must a Claimant have
Claimant must have a proprietary interest in the land
Claimant Case
Hunter v Canary Wharf - Claimants who did not own or were not tenants could not claim
What is a Defendant
Any person whose activities cause unlawful interference with another’s use or enjoyment of land
Types of Defendant
Adopted Nuisance Case
Sedleigh v O’Callaghan - D knew of the installed pipe but did nothing about it
Authorising Nuisance Case
Tetley v Chittey - D knew lease for go-karting would cause nuisance
Natural Act Case
Leakey v National Trust - D knew land could slip which it did, damaging C’s cottage
2nd Element
Indirect Interference
What can indirect interference be
Can be physical damage to land or loss of enjoyment
Types of indirect interference
Example of Noise Interference
Sturges v Bridgman - Vibrations from industrial machinery
Example of Smell Interference
Bliss v Hall - Fumes from neighbouring land
Example of Cricket Balls Interference
Miller v Jackson - continuous interference from cricket balls
Example of shops Interference
Laws v Florinplace - adult shops in a residential area
3rd Element
Unlawful
Explain Unlawful/Unreasonable
Court will ask whether it is reasonable for the claimant to have to suffer particular interference
Examples of Unlawful/Unreasonable use of Land
Example of Locality
Sturges v Bridgman - Doctor caused substantial and unreasonable interference with a neighbour’s use of their property, even if activity existed first
Locality Quote
“What would be a nuisance in Belgrave square would not be so in Bermondsey”
Example of Duration
Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton - D’s firework display only lasted twenty minutes, debris set a river barge alight causing physical damage
Example of Degree Interference
Murdoch v Glacier Metal - No nuisance as there was a considerable amount of noise from a nearby road
Explain sensitivity of claimant
Bridlington Relay v Yorkshire Electric -Claimant will not succeed if using his property for an extra sensitive purpose