What engagements are covered by the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct?
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct - Principles
What are threats (7) and safeguards (3) to independence?
_Threats _to independence:
(a) Self-review threat—Reviewing evidence that results from the member’s own work (e.g., preparing source documents for an audit client).
(b) Advocacy threat—Actions promoting the client’s interests or position (e.g., promoting a client’s securities).
(c) Adverse interest threat—Actions or interests between the member and the client that are in opposition (e.g., litigation between the client and the member).
(d) Familiarity threat—Members having a close or longstanding relationship with client or knowing individuals or entities who performed nonattest services for the client, (e.g., a member of the attest engagement team whose spouse is in a key position at the client).
(e) Undue influence threat—Attempts by a client’s management (or others) to coerce the member or exercise excessive influence over the member (e.g., threat to replace the member over a disagreement regarding an accounting principle).
(f) Financial self-interest threat—Potential benefit to a member from a financial interest in, or some financial relationship with, an attest client (e.g., having a direct financial interest in the client).
(g) Management participation threat—Assuming the role of management or performing management functions
for the attest client (e.g., serving as an officer of the client).
Threats > Safeguards ⇒ No Independence
Independence
attestation engagement - ERA’s
What are the requirements for Non-attest engagements?
When are contingent fees NOT allowed?
When are contingent fees allowed?
When fees are structured relative to judicial proceedings
Department of Labor (DOL)
Due Care
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct - ET Section 56 - Article V–Due Care.
the principle of due care requires the member to observe the profession’s technical and ethical standards, strive continually to improve competence and the quality of services, and discharge responsibility to the best of the member’s ability.
(1) Competence is derived from both education and experience.
(2) Each member is responsible for assessing his or her own competence and for evaluating whether education, experience,
and judgment are adequate for the responsibility taken.
Interpretation 101-1. - Independence is impaired if
Interpretation 101-1. Independence is impaired if
(1) During the period of the professional engagement a covered member
(a) had or was committed to acquire any direct or material indirect financial interest in the client
(b) was a trustee of any trust or executor or administrator of any estate if such trust or estate had or was committed to acquire any direct or material indirect financial interest in the client
(c) had a joint closely held investment that was material to the covered member.
(d) except as specifically permitted in interpretation 101-5, had any loan to or from the client, any officer or director of the client, or any individual owning 10% or more of the client’s outstanding equity securities or other ownership interests.
(2) During the period of the professional engagement, a partner or professional employee of the firm, his or her immediate family, or any group of such persons acting together owned more than 5% of a client’s outstanding equity securities or other ownership interests.
(3) During the period covered by the financial statements or during the period of the professional engagement, a partner or professional employee of the firm was simultaneously associated with the client as a
(a) Director, officer, or employee, or in any capacity equivalent to that of a member of management;
(b) Promoter, underwriter, or voting trustee; or
(c) Trustee for any pension or profit-sharing trust of the client.
Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)
Employee benefit plans must be audited in accordance with the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as enforced by the Department of Labor (DOL).
For purposes of auditing these plans, the DOL has issued guidelines to determine whether the accountant is independent.
Which standards apply to consulting engagements?
Consulting engagements are covered by Statements on Standards for Consulting Services (SSCS)
General Standard Rule 201 :
• Professional Competence
• Due Professional Care
• Planning & Supervision
• Obtain Sufficient Data
• Must Serve Client Interest – with integrity & objectivity
• Must have written or oral agreement
• Must communicate with client
List some common consulting engagements.
When is a GAAP departure appropriate?
Departure from GAAP is appropriate only when GAAP would cause Financial Statements to be misleading
Departure must be explained & disclosed
Example of possible circumstance justifying departure are **New form of business and New legislation **
Confidentiality
Rule 301
What is the effect of not returning all client-provided documents upon request?
This is an discreditable act.
What are the rules with respect to CPA firm names?
CPA firm names must not be misleading.
If partner dies- remaining partner has two years to change name if partnership dissolved.
If partner dies and more than one partner still remains (i.e. 1 dies and you still have 2 or more partners...you don’t need to change the name) -
All Partners/Shareholders must be members of the AICPA in order to hold themselves out as members of the AICPA. Non-CPAs can be owners- but 2/3 of Ownership must be CPAs.
Non-CPA owner must not be involved with the accounting- and is still bound by AICPA code of conduct- must maintain CPE requirements and have Bachelor’s degree.
What is the consequence of disclosing CPA exam material post-1996?
It is an Act Discreditable.
What are the consequences for a CPA who commits an Act Discreditable?
Who must approve non-audit work performed by a firm for a client?
Which organization is in charge of determining if federal funds are being misappropriated?
GAO - Government Accountability Office
What rules must auditors follow for governmental audits?
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 prohibits the performance of certain services for audit clients by auditors of public companies
(7)
Act lists several specific service categories that issuer’s public accounting firm cannot legally do, even if approved by audit committee, such as
Note that Act does not restrict auditor from performing these services to nonaudit clients or to private companie
Act intended to restrict specified categories performed for public audit clients
Act permits auditor as a registered public accounting firm to perform nonaudit services not specifically prohibited (e.g., tax services) when approved by issuer’s audit committee
Payment prior year fees and independence
Independence is impaired when prior year fees for professional services, whether billed or unbilled, remain unpaid for more than one year prior to the date of the report
Year 1 audit fees must be paid before the Year 2 report is issued