Pros and cons of functional and projectized structure
Functional:
Advantages
No structural change
Flexibility
In-depth expertise
Easy post-project transition
Disadvantages
Lack of focus
Poor integration
Slow
Lack of ownership
Projectized:
Advantages
Simple
Fast
Cohesive
Cross-Functional Integration
Disadvantages
Expensive
Internal Strife
Limited Technological Expertise
Difficult Post-Project Transition
Project Scope Checklist
1.1 Project objectives (SMART)
1.2 Deliverables
1.3 Milestones
1.4 Technical requirements
1.5 Limits and exclusions
1.6 Reviews with customer
List the two broad approaches (main groups of methods) for estimating times and costs. For each approach, list and explain briefly one specific method
Types of Estimates
1. Top-down (macro) estimates: analogy, group
consensus, or mathematical relationships
Are usually derived from someone who uses
experience and/or information to determine the
project duration and total cost.
Can serve as a check on cost elements in the WBS
by rolling up the work packages and associated cost
accounts to major deliverables at the work package
level.
Estimating
The process of forecasting or approximating the time and
cost of completing project deliverables.
–The task of balancing expectations of stakeholders and
need for control while the project is implemented.
Organizational Breakdown Structure (OBS)
–Depicts how the firm is organized to discharge its
work responsibility for a project.
Project Scope
–A definition of the end result or mission of the project—a
product or service for the client/customer—in specific,
tangible, and measurable terms.
–The range of the area that the project deals with
–What is included in the project AND what is not included
Purpose of the Scope Statement
–To clearly define the deliverable(s) for the end user.
–To focus the project on successful completion
of its goals.
–To be used by the project owner and participants
as a planning tool and for measuring project success.
SMART
Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time related