In a lease of whole who is responsible for what?
In a lease in part who is responsible for what?
Qualified repairing obligation?
· A commercial tenant will almost always be responsible for the repair of their demise, ie the extent of the premises let to them. The first step is to look at the definition of “Premises”, “Demised Premises”, “Property” or similar in the lease.
· Lease of whole - the landlord’s title such as an office block, the definition of “Premises” will refer simply to the title and postal address of the office block. The tenant is responsible for the interior, exterior and structural repair.
· Lease of part - the definition of “Premises” will specify, for example, the fifth floor of the office block. But it will also go into much more detail of the demise, such as including the floor and ceiling coverings, but not the structure nor exterior of the building. The tenant is only responsible for interior repair.
· Lease of whole - the repairing responsibility is solely the tenant’s.
· Lease of part - other demises are the responsibility of their respective tenants. Areas of the building or estate used commonly by all tenants (“common parts”), such as hallways, lifts and staircases, communal car parking, etc, are the responsibility of the landlord.
· Although the landlord will bear responsibility for repairing the common parts, the landlord will recover the cost of doing so collectively from the tenants by way of service charge payments. An FRI lease typically contains extensive clauses setting out the services and how they are charged.
· Full repairing obligation
· Qualified repairing obligation
· Unless the lease states otherwise, the tenant may generally choose whether to repair or replace an item of disrepair.
· Note that if the premises are damaged beyond repair; for example, if subsidence has caused the premises to be so damaged that they need to be rebuilt, this is renewal, not repair and the tenant is not responsible for doing this under a simple repairing obligation. A tenant may be asked to covenant to renew the premises, but this is onerous and should be avoided.
· If the lease refers to keeping the premises in good repair and condition, this is more onerous to the tenant (for example, condensation comes within condition, but not repair).
· If the property is newly constructed, it may have inherent or structural defects that only come to light over time. These may cause issues that the tenant would be obliged to repair under its repairing obligation.
· This is unfair, as the tenant is not responsible for them, and the landlord should have warranties from the contractors (the builder, structural engineer, architect, etc) that the landlord can rely on.
· A tenant taking a lease of a newly constructed property should ensure that inherent and structural defects are therefore excluded from the tenant’s repairing obligation and service charge contributions.
· A commercial landlord will almost always be responsible for the insurance of the building (even where it is a lease of whole). In keeping with the principles of an FRI lease, the cost of insuring will be recovered from the tenant under the lease.
· In a lease of whole, the landlord will insure the whole, and the sole tenant will refund the landlord the whole of the insurance premium.
· In a lease of part, the landlord will insure the whole, and each tenant will refund the landlord a proportionate part of the insurance premium.
· The money that the tenant or tenants pay to the landlord will usually be referred to as “insurance rent”. The reason for this is covered in the element on termination of leases.
· A typical definition of insured risks in a lease might look like the following:
· fire, explosion, lightning, earthquake, tempest, storm, flood, bursting and overflowing of water tanks, apparatus or pipes, damage to underground water, oil or gas pipes or electricity wires or cables, impact by aircraft and aerial devices and articles dropped from them, impact by vehicles, subsidence, ground slip, heave, riot, civil commotion, strikes, labour or political disturbances, malicious damage
What are insured risks?
· These are the risks that will be covered by the insurance policy taken out by the landlord. The definition may allow for the landlord to add other risks to the list from time to time.
· They will also be excluded from the tenant’s repairing obligation, except in certain instances (eg, if the tenant’s negligence means that the insurance is not paid out).
is typically expressed as an obligation to keep the premises in repair but extends to putting the premises into repair if they are not.
What could a covenant against alterations be?
What are alterations?
What happens if a lease is silent on alterations?
means that they are not permitted. Landlord can always consent but it doesn’t need to give it or act reasonably.
* If the tenant wants to make an alteration covered by an absolute covenant, they can ask the landlord, but the landlord has no obligation even to consider such a request.
means that they are only permitted with landlord’s consent. The landlord does not have to give consent.
is similar to a qualified covenant, but in this case, the landlord must act reasonably in deciding to withhold consent or adding conditions when giving consent.
When is a qualified covenent against alterations upgraded to fully qualified?
licence for alterations?
Covenant against change of use?
What happens if the landlord consents to change of use?
section 19(3) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 does mean that if the landlord decides to give consent to a change of use, the landlord may not charge a lump sum or increase the rent for giving consent unless the change of use also requires structural alterations (in which case the landlord may charge a lump sum or increase the rent for giving consent).