what is property?
it can be:
1. object or thing capable of being owned by a person; or
2. proprietary rights (rights of ownership) to that object or thing
e.g. land and a car are objects that are capable of being owned -> the proprietary rights to the land and car will be vested in a particular person or persons, e.g. accordingly, it can be said that the land and car are property, and that the property (i.e. rights of ownership) in the land and the car is vested in
real and personal property
real property:
- land, and all things embedded in the land or attached to it such as minerals, trees and buildings
- all interests in land are real except for leases
personal property:
- all property that is not real property
- includes tangible things (chattels) and property of an intangible nature
- e.g. intellectual property rights, debts and shares
personal property
can be divided into two categories:
- chose in action
- chose in possession
chose is a french word for thing
personal property
chose in action
e.g:
- right to sue
- shares in a company
- intellectual property
personal property
chose in possession
e.g:
- ownership of a house
- ownership of a car
- ownership of jewellery, artworks, stamp collections or other collectible items etc
rights of a person in possession
possession is good against the whole world except the owner
ownership v possession
a person in possession of an object has legal rights even where that person is not the owner
possession confers a right to retain control of an object against any other person except the person with ownership rights
e.g. a chimney sweep’s boy found a jewel and offerered it to a jeweller for sale. the jeweller refused to pay an acceptable price or return it
- held: the jeweller was liable to the boy for the value of the jewel
- ‘the’ finder of a jewel, though he does not by such finding acquire an absolute property or ownership, yes he has such a property as will enable him to keep it against all but the rightful owner
bailment: when the party of ownership still has ownership over the property but is sharing possession over a certain period of time
3.220
armory v delamirie 1722
the finding cases
the principles applied vary according to whether the articles are found:
- in the land;
- attached to land; or
- on land
the finding cases
articles found in or attached to land
as between the owner or possessor of the land and the finder of the article, the owner or possessor of land has the better title
e.g. the plaintiff leased land to the defendents for 99 years -> while excavating foundations for a gasholder, the defendants found a prehistoric boat 6 feet below the surface
- the lessor claimed the boat
- it was held that the lessor was entitled to the boat; he had lawful possession good against the world
3.230
elwes v brigg gas co 1886
the finding cases
articles found on land
the owner or possessor of the land has a better title only if c/he exercised such manifest control over the land as to indicate an intention to control the land and anything that might be found on it
e.g. an an aircraft passenger found a gold bracelet on the floor of the executive louge at heathrow airport -> he handed the bracelet to an employee of the airways board (liscense of the premises) -> the owner of the bracelet was never found -> the finder sued the board for the value of the bracelet
- held: there was no evidence that the board had manifested an intention to exercise control over all things that might be upon or in the premises
- e.g. by searching for lost items on a regular basis
- therefore, the finder had better right to possession
3.240
parker v british airways board 1982
the finding cases
articles found in the course of employment
general principle: articles belong to the employer, where the employment is not the cause of the finding but merely incidental to it, it has been held that the employee is entitled to the goods
e.g. a queensland policeman was performing special duty at the drive-in when he found a small ingot of gold
- held: in finding the ingot, he was in the same position as any casual passer-by
- the performance of his duties was not the real or effective cause of the finding
- accordingly, he was entitled to the ingot against the world - except the true owner who could not be found
3.250
byrne v hoare 1965
real property
land generally included not only the surface of the land but also things attached to it, substances below the surface, and the airspace above
definition of land
limits of land: height and depth
ownership extends upwards to the heavens and downwards to the centre of the earth (but there are some exceptions) -> the crown (state) owns minerals in soil
fixtures
general principles: refers to anything which has become so attached to the land as to form in law, part of the land
- e.g. buildings and fences -> however difficult questions arise whether a chattel has become a fixture
- a chattel is a non-fixture
3.450 & 4.40
australian provincial assuarance co ltd v coronco per jordan cj
national australia bank v blacker per conti j
pan australian credits (sa) pty ltd
wellsmore v ratford
nation daries wa ltd v commissioner of state revenue
interests in land
estates in land
co-ownership of land
- joint tenacies
- tenants in common
what is “good title”
old systems and torrens title
legal and equitable interests in land
4.50
interests in land
estates in land
estates in land are classified as either:
- freehold estates; or
- leasehold estates
estates in land
freehold estates and leasehold estates
interests in land
freehold estates are of uncertain duration: there are two main types of freehold estates:
- the estates in fee simple (absolute form of ownership on holder and indefinitely to whoever they select to assign the land to subsequently); and
- the life estate (gratned to person for duration of his/her life or for the life of some other identified person)
leasehold estates are of certain duration
4.60
interests in land
types of ownership of land
co-owners of land own the land either as:
- joint tenants, or
- tenants in common
types of ownership of land
joint tenancy
interests in land
doctrine of survivorship
- “right of survivorship”
- when one party dies, the other automatically gets their interest
title to real property
there are two systems of title to real property in australia:
- old system title
- torrens title
types of ownership of land
tenancy in common
interests in land
no doctrine of survivorship
- when a tenant in ommon dies, s/he can leave their sahre to someone else
- a tenant in common can ell their share to outsider
title to real property
real property - old system title
ownership is proved by tracing ownership back to an unhallengeable beginning
chain of title, making a ‘good root of title’
- tracing of title required each time owners wanted to deal with their property
- documents - “deeds of converyance” - traace the “chain of title” to the land by reference to the various owners of the land
- to establish the title of the present owner, a potential purchaser of the land must trace the owner’s title back over a period of years
- difficult, time consuming and complex procedure
- now applied to only very few parcels of land in australia that are not registered under the torrens system
title to real property
real property - torrens title
torrens title is a system of registered title
- it is based upon a document of certification - the certificate of title - issues by the state in duplicate
torrens title
registration gives title (ownership) of the land to the ‘registered proprietor’ (owner)
- title held under a registered interst is indefeasible
- those holding other types of interest over the land can also register their interests on title (e.g. mortgages, leases)
- legal interest
effect of registration
- removes uncertainties of title
- provides proof of title of the registered proprietor so no other person can claim to be the ‘owner’
- gives priority upon registration (indefeasibility prinicple)
exceptions to indefeasibility of title
- statutory fraud
- unconscionable conduct
- constructive trust - where registered owner holds the land subject to rights of beneficiaries
frazer v walker (new zealand case)
caveats
a written warning or an entry amde in the register to stop certain land dealings without notice being given to the person who lodged it
- it is like an injunction and shows that someone else has a recognised interest in the land and protects equitable interests
- e.g. a person who claims an equitable interest in the land (such as a purchaser) may lodge a caveat forbidding the registration of any new dealings (such as a purchaser trying to stop the vendor from selling the property to someone else)